Mergers and Acquisitions pp 1-4 | Cite as
Mergers and Acquisitions: A Global View
Abstract
Many theories have been offered to explain why mergers and acquisitions (M&As) occur. Efficiency theories suggest that mergers occur to exploit economies of scale or synergies. Market power theories argue that consoli-dation creates oligopoly benefits. Agency theories suggest that mergers and acquisitions may solve agency problems by acting as a mechanism to remove ineffective managers or, alternatively, that mergers and acqui-sitions may be a manifestation of agency problems with managers making unwise acquisitions as a result of hubris or empire-building motives. Benefits from diver-sification or tax considerations have also been suggested as a motive for M&A activity. Although no single cohesive theory of mergers and acquisi-tion has been developed, most of these theories have received at least some empirical support.
Keywords
Abnormal Return Initial Public Offering Private Equity Cumulative Abnormal Return Merger ActivityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Andrade, Gregor, Mitchell, Mark and Stafford, Erik (2001) “New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harford, Jarrad (2005) “What Drives Merger Waves?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holmstrom, Bengt and Kaplan, Steven N. (2001) “Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the United States: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 121–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell, Mark L. and Mulherin, J. Harold (1996) “The Impact of Industry Shocks on Takeover and Restructuring Activity”, Journal of Financial Economics, 41, 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar