Mad Dogs and Englishmen pp 40-68 | Cite as
Rabies at Bay: ‘The Dog Days’, 1831–1863
Abstract
Between 1830 and 1860 rabies was overshadowed by wider problems in pubic health and public order. Public health became dominated by zymotic diseases, especially epidemic diseases such as cholera, typhoid fever, scarlet fever, and typhus, which contemporaries understood to be mostly generated by filth and malign conditions, and to be spread by aerial miasmas.1 Hydrophobia was classed as a zymotic disease, though like syphilis spread by contact contagion. The fight against epidemics was led by so-called sanitarians who emphasised aerial transmission of disease poisons and focused on the physical environment, principally the water supply, sewage, and nuisance removal; in their view few important diseases seemed to be spread by direct contagion.2 Public order became political order, first in the reform crisis of 1830–1832, then in the introduction of the New Poor Law, and then the Chartist campaigns, which seemed to some contemporaries to threaten revolution.
Keywords
Typhoid Fever Scarlet Fever Select Committee Animal Cruelty Spontaneous OriginPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.On zymotic diseases see M. Worboys, Spreading Germs: Disease Theories and Medical Practice in Britain, 1865–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 34–42.Google Scholar
- 2.C. Hamlin, Public Health and Social Justice in the Age of Chadwick: Britain, 1800–54, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
- 15.C. Otter, ‘Cleansing and Clarifying: Technology and Perception in Nineteenth Century London’, Journal of British Studies, 2004, 43: 40–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Smithfield and its livestock market was already a place of notoriety for cruelty to animals. See D. Donald, ‘Beastly Sights’: The Treatment of Animals as a Moral Theme in Representations of London c. 1820–50’, Art History, 1999, 22: 514–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.B. Harrison, ‘Animals and the State in Nineteenth Century England’, English Historical Review, 1973, 88: 786–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.W. Schivelbusch, The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century, Berkley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
- 39.Bill to Amend Acts for More Effectual Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Parl. Papers, 1854, (106), ii, 145–49. See M. Radford, Animal Welfare Law in Britain: Regulation and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 63–65 and 82.Google Scholar
- 51.Discussions of the Brontës and dogs to date have ignored rabies.: I. Kreilkamp, ‘Petted Things: Wuthering Heights and the Animal’, Yale Journal of Criticism, 2005, 18: 87–110; M. B. Adams, ‘Emily Brontë and Dogs: Transformation Within the Human-Dog Bond’, Society and Animals, 2000, 8: 167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Emily Brontë, Wuthering Heights, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2003;Google Scholar
- Charlotte Brontë, Shirley, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar
- 74.Paradoxically, in the 1848–1849 cholera outbreak in Bradford dogs were suspected to be carriers of the disease. They were ordered to be confined and strays were killed. M. Sigsworth, Cholera in the West and East Ridings of Yorkshire, 1848–1892, Unpublished DPhil Thesis, Sheffield City Polytechnic, 1991.Google Scholar
- 77.T. L. Kemp, ‘Rabies and Hydrophobia’, Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, 1855, 58: 1–19.Google Scholar
- 79.J. Netten Radcliffe, ‘Materials towards the formation of a better knowledge of hydrophobia’, Lancet, 1855, i: 153–4 and 258–60; 1856, i: 683–5; 1856, ii: 217 and 271–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 83.E. Phillips, ‘Dick, William (1793–1866)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/ article/56035, accessed 12 Jan 2007].Google Scholar
- 86.W. C. L. Martin, The History of the Dog: Its Origin, Physical and Moral Characteristics, and its Principal Varieties, London: Charles Knight & Co., 1845;Google Scholar
- H. D. Richardson, The Dog; Its Origin, Natural History and Varieties. With Directions for Its General Management, London: Wm. S. Orr & Co., 1851;Google Scholar
- E. Mayhew, Dogs: Their Management. Being a New Plan of Treating the Animal, Based upon a Consideration of His Natural Temperament, London: George Routledge and Co., 1854.Google Scholar
- 87.F. Galton, ‘Heredity Talent and Character’, Macmillan’s Magazine, 1865, 12: 157–66 and 318–27.Google Scholar
- 97.Stonehenge [John Henry Walsh], The Dog, in Health and Disease, London: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1859.Google Scholar
- 100.G. H. Lewes, ‘Mad Dogs’, Blackwood’s Magazine, 1861, 90: 222–40.Google Scholar
- 101.Rosemary Ashton, ‘Lewes, George Henry (1817–1878)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/16562, accessed 16 Nov 2006].Google Scholar
- 102.D. Noble, ‘George Henry Lewes, George Eliot and the Physiological Society’, Journal of Physiology, 1976, 263(1): 45–54.Google Scholar
- 103.Quoted in J. B. West, ‘Spontaneous Combustion, Dickens, Lewes, and Lavoisier’, Physiology, 1994, 9: 276.Google Scholar
- 105.G. Cottesloe, Lost, Stolen or Strayed. The Story of the Battersea Dogs’ Home, London: Arthur Barker, 1971.Google Scholar
- 106.H. F. ‘The Home for Lost and Starving Dogs’, The Field, 1860, 16: 434.Google Scholar