Reframing the Spoiler Debate in Peace Processes

  • Marie-Joëlle Zahar

Abstract

Why do some peace agreements end civil conflict while others break down? Empirical evidence underscores the importance of sustainability: the Rwandan genocide succeeded the 1992 Arusha peace agreement; likewise, some of the worst violence in Angola, Sri Lanka, and Cambodia (among others) followed the breakdown of peace accords.

Keywords

Peace Process North Atlantic Treaty Organization Ethnic Conflict Peace Agreement Peace Negotiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    S.J. Stedman, ‘Spoiler problems in peace processes’, International Security, 22, 2 (Fall 1997), p. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 13.
    P. Kecskemeti, ‘Political Rationality in Ending War’, in W.T.R. Fox (ed.), How Wars End ( Philadelphia PA: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1970 ), pp. 105–115.Google Scholar
  3. 16.
    J. Fearon, ‘Commitment Problems and the Spread of Ethnic Conflict’, in D. Lake & D. Rothchild (eds), The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation ( Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998 ), pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
  4. 17.
    M.J. Zahar, ‘Political Violence in Peace Processes: Voice, Exit and Loyalty in the Post-Accord Period’, in J. Darby (ed.), Violence and Reconstruction ( Southbend IL: Notre Dame University Press, 2006 ).Google Scholar
  5. 18.
    S. Stedman, ‘Peace Processes and the Challenges of Violence’, in J. Darby & R. Mac Ginty (eds), Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003), pp. 103–113 at p. 107.Google Scholar
  6. 40.
    S.J. Stedman, ‘Policy Implications’, in S.J. Stedman, D. Rothchild, & E.M. Cousens (eds), Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements ( Boulder CO: Reinner, 2002 ), p. 664.Google Scholar
  7. 43.
    M.J. Zahar, ‘The Dichotomy of International Mediation and Leader Intransigence: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina’, in I. O’Flynn & D. Russell (eds), New Challenges for Power-Sharing: Institutional and Social Reform in Divided Societies ( London: Pluto Press, 2005 ).Google Scholar
  8. 44.
    B. Barry, ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty’, in B. Barry (ed.), Democracy and Power: Essays in Political Theory, I ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991 ), pp. 187–221.Google Scholar
  9. 45.
    See K. Cannings, ‘The voice of the loyal manager: Distinguishing attachment from commitment’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 5, 3 (1992) p. 262.Google Scholar
  10. 47.
    M.J. Zahar, ‘Understanding the Violence of Insiders: Loyalty, Custodians of Peace, and the Sustainability of Conflict Settlement’, in E. Newman & O. Richmond (eds), Spoilers and Peace Processes: Conflict Settlement and Devious Objectives ( Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2006 ).Google Scholar
  11. 48.
    A. Lijphart, ‘Consociational democracy’, World Politics 21 (1969), pp. 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Lijphart, Democracy in Plural Societies ( New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1977 ).Google Scholar
  13. A. Lijphart and A. Lijphart, ‘The Power-Sharing Approach’, in J.V. Montville (ed.), Conflict and Peacemaking in Multiethnic Societies ( New York: Lexington Books, 1991 ), pp. 491–509.Google Scholar
  14. 49.
    J.P. Lederach, Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies ( Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997 ).Google Scholar
  15. 51.
    P. Kecskemeti, ‘Political Rationality in Ending War’, in W.T.R. Fox (ed.), How Wars End ( Philadelphia PA: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1970 ), pp. 105–115.Google Scholar
  16. 52.
    T. Lyons, ‘The Role of Postsettlement Elections’, in S.J. Stedman, D. Rothchild, & E.M. Cousens (eds), Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements ( Boulder CO: Reinner, 2002 ), p. 222.Google Scholar
  17. 53.
    S.J. Stedman, ‘Negotiation and Mediation in Internal Conflict’, in M. Brown (ed.), The International Dimensions of Internal Conflict ( Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996 ), p. 370.Google Scholar
  18. 54.
    T. Ohlson & S.J. Stedman, The New is Not Yet Born: Conflict Resolution in Southern Africa ( Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 1994 ), p. 193.Google Scholar
  19. 55.
    D. Rothchild & P. Roeder (eds), Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars ( Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2005 ).Google Scholar
  20. 58.
    J. Darby & R. Mac Ginty, ‘What Peace, What Process’, in J. Darby & R. Mac Ginty (eds), Contemporary Peacemaking (Palgrave Macmillan, 2003 ), p. 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marie-Joëlle Zahar 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Joëlle Zahar

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations