The Keynesian Tradition pp 65-98 | Cite as
Harrod’s Discontent with Harrodian Growth Theory
Chapter
Abstract
The ‘Harrod-Domar growth model’ is traditionally seen as the starting point of modern growth theory. Its core is found in two similar equations. The first (describing the growth rate of the economic system in terms of the proportion of income saved and the capital/output ratio) was expounded by Roy Harrod in ‘An Essay in Dynamic Theory’ (1939); the second (expressing the growth rate in terms of the society’s productive capacity and of the propensity to save) was formulated by Evsey Domar in “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment” (1946) and “Expansion and Employment” (1947).
Keywords
Trade Cycle Economic Journal Growth Theory Full Employment Dynamic Economic
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Carter, C.F., Letter to Harrod, 22 August 1969, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107.Google Scholar
- Haberler, G., Systematic Analysis of the Theories of the Business Cycle, League of Nations: Economic Intelligence Service, August 1934, TD, in League of Nations Archives, Geneva, file 10B/12653/12653, Jacket No 1.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F., Letter to R.C.O. Matthews, 7 January 1964, Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), unclassified folder.Google Scholar
- Letter to R.C.O. Matthews, 8 January 1964, Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), unclassified folder.Google Scholar
- Letter to A.A. Arzumanyan, 15 December 1964, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV/B/C.Google Scholar
- Letter to S. Menshikov, 2 March 1965, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV/B/C.Google Scholar
- Letter to the British Council, September 1965, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file VII/F–5.Google Scholar
- Letter to J.V. Robinson, 1 February 1966, carbon copy in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107.Google Scholar
- Letter to G.L.S. Shackle, 11 January 1966, Shackle Papers (Cambridge University Library), file 9/1/383.Google Scholar
- Letter to G.L.S. Shackle, 24 March 1966, Shackle Papers (Cambridge University Library), file 9/1/393.Google Scholar
- ‘Growth theory. Lecture delivered at the State University of Moscow, on April 22, 1966, by R.F. Harrod’, initialled typescript, 23 pages, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file V/326.Google Scholar
- Letter to C.F. Carter, undated (but probably 7 November 1969), carbon copy in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file V-124.Google Scholar
- Untitled Notes (on J.V. Robinson’s “Harrod after twenty years”), 1969, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file V-124.Google Scholar
- Letter to J.V. Robinson, 20 December 1969, marked ‘copy’, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file V-124.Google Scholar
- Letter to J.V. Robinson, 27 April 1970, carbon copy in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file V-124.Google Scholar
- Letter to J.V. Robinson, undated [April or May 1970], carbon copy in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107.Google Scholar
- Lecture notes in the Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce): Pennsylvania University, 1969: index in file V-128/6, notes in files V-127/1 (1/3) and V-128/2 (1/12, 2–3/12); Pennsylvania 1970, file V-132/6; Rutgers, 1969 (perhaps also delivered at Iowa), file V-132/7; Claremont (probably 1970), Maryland, Waterloo in file V-132/5; Princeton (perhaps 1969), file V-132/11; Keio University, Japan, file V-132/8. All these folders are unfoliated. Matthews, R.C.O.Google Scholar
- Letter to Harrod, 2 January 1964, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-732–741. Robinson, J.V.Google Scholar
- Letter to Harrod, 8 December [1965], in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107.Google Scholar
- Letter to Harrod, 20 December 1965, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107.Google Scholar
- Letter to Harrod, 10 January 1966, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107.Google Scholar
- ‘Harrod after twenty years’, 1969 (draft of Robinson, 1970), in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107 and file V-124 (copy).Google Scholar
- Letter to Harrod, 2 September 1969, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107.Google Scholar
- Letter to Harrod, 29 April 1970, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1089–1107. Shackle, G.L.S.Google Scholar
- Letter to Harrod, 11 January 1966, in Harrod Papers (Chiba University of Commerce), file IV-1148–1151.Google Scholar
Published writings
- Alexander, S.S. (1950) ‘Mr. Harrod’s dynamic model’, Economic Journal, vol. LX, December, pp. 724–39.Google Scholar
- Baumol, W.J. (1948) ‘Notes on some dynamic models’, Economic Journal, vol. LVIII, (December): 506–21.Google Scholar
- Besomi, D. (1996) ‘An additional note on the Harrod-Keynes correspondence’, History of Political Economy, vol. 28, no. 2: 281–94.Google Scholar
- Besomi, D. (1996a) Editorial apparatus to R.F. Harrod, ‘ “An Essay in Dynamic Theory”: 1938 draft’, History of Political Economy 28:2, pp. 245–251.Google Scholar
- Besomi, D. (1998) ‘Failing to win consent. Harrod’s dynamics in the eyes of his readers’, in G. Rampa, L. Stella and A. Thirlwall (eds), Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth: Essays on Harrodian Themes, London: Macmillan, pp. 38–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Besomi, D. (1998a) ‘Harrod and the time-lag theories of the cycle’, in G. Rampa, L. Stella and A. Thirlwall (eds), Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth: Essays on Harrodian Themes, London: Macmillan, pp. 107–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Besomi, D. (1999) The Making of Harrod’s Dynamics, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Besomi, D. (1999a) ‘Harrod’s instability principle and trade cycles’, in P. O’Hara (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Economy, vol. 1, London: Routledge, pp. 425–7.Google Scholar
- Besomi, D. (2001) ‘Harrod’s dynamics and the theory of growth: the story of a mistaken attribution’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 25, no. 1 (January): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Besomi, D. (2003) ‘The papers of Roy Harrod’, History of Economics Review, 37 (Winter): 19–40.Google Scholar
- Besomi, D. (2005) ‘A goodwilling outsider. The correspondence between Keynes and Harrod’, in M.C. Marcuzzo and A. Rosselli (eds), Economists in Cambridge. A Study Through Their Correspondence, 1907–1946, London: Routledge, pp. 92–118.Google Scholar
- Domar, E.D. (1946) ‘Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment’, Econometrica, 14 (April): 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Domar, E.D. (1947) ‘Expansion and employment’, American Economic Review, 37 (March): 34–55.Google Scholar
- Hahn, F., and R.C.O. Matthews (1964) ‘The theory of economic growth: a survey’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXIV (December): 779–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1934a) ‘Doctrines of imperfect competition’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 48 (May): 442–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1934b) ‘The expansion of credit in an advancing community’, Economica, NS 1 (August): 287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1934c) ‘Rejoinder to Mr. Robertson’, Economica, NS 1 (November): 476–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1936) The Trade Cycle. An Essay, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1937) ‘Mr. Keynes and traditional theory’, Econometrica, vol 5. (January): 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1938) ‘Scope and method of economics’, Economic Journal, XLVIII (September): 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1939) ‘An essay in dynamic theory’, Economic Journal, XLIX (March): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1948) Towards a Dynamic Economics, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1951) The Life of John Maynard Keynes, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1951a) ‘Notes on trade cycle theory’, Economic Journal, vol. XLI (June): 261–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1953) ‘Comment [to Pilvin]’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. LXVII, no. 4 (November): 553–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1955) ‘Les relations entre l’investissement et la population’, Revue Économique, vol. 6, no. 3 (May): 356–67.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1959) ‘Domar and dynamic economics’, Economic Journal, vol. LXIX (September): 451–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1963) ‘Themes in dynamic theory’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXIII (September): 401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1964) ‘Are monetary and fiscal policies enough?’, Economic Journal, LXXIV (December): 903–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1965) [Review of] ‘Essays in economic policy. By N. Kaldor’, Economic Journal LXXV (December): 794–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1967) ‘Increasing returns’, in R.E. Kuenne, Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact. Essays in Honor of Edward H. Chamberlin, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1968) ‘What is a model?’, in J.N. Wolfe (ed.), Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, Edinburgh University Press, pp. 173–91.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1970) ‘Harrod after twenty-one years: a comment’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXX (September): 737–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1971) ‘[Review of] Kalecki, Michal. Introduction to the Theory of Growth in a Socialist Economy’, Kyklos, 24: 149–52.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1972) ‘Imperfect competition, aggregate demand and inflation’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXXII (March): 392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (1973) Economic Dynamics, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrod, R.F. (2003) The Collected Interwar Papers and Correspondence of Roy Harrod, ed. D. Besomi, 3 volumes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Harrod, R.F., and J.V. Robinson (2006) ‘Correspondence on growth theory, 1965–70’, ed. D. Besomi, History of Economics Review, 44 (Summer): 16–30.Google Scholar
- Jolink, A. (1995) ‘ “Anecdotal myths”: Tinbergen’s influence on Harrod’s growth theory’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2:2 (Autumn): 443–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lodewijks, J. (1990) ‘Sidney Weintraub, the English Dons, and an unpublished obituary of Harrod’, The History of Economic Thought Society of Australia Bulletin, 13 (Winter): 8–17.Google Scholar
- McCord Wright, D. (1949) ‘Mr. Harrod and growth economics’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. XXXI, no. 4 (November): 322–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moggridge, D.E. (1973) Editorial apparatus to The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIV, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Morishima, M. (1969) Theory of Economic Growth, Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robinson, J.V. (1970) ‘Harrod after twenty-one years’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXX (September): 731–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robinson, J.V. (1970a) ‘ “Harrod after twenty-one years”: a reply’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXX (September): 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robinson, J.V. (1971) Economic Heresies. Some Old-Fashioned Questions in Economic Theory, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shackle, G.L.S. (1965) A Scheme of Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Shackle, G.L.S. (1967) The Years of High Theory. Invention and Tradition in Economic Thought 1926–1936, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tinbergen, J. (1937) ‘(Review of) Harrod, R.F., The Trade Cycle. An Essay’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 45.3: 89*–91*.Google Scholar
- Young, W. (1989) Harrod and his Trade Cycle Group. The Origins and Development of the Growth Research Programme, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Daniele Besomi 2008