Globalization and Regionalization in Central Europe: Positive and Negative Responses to the Global Challenge

  • Attila Ágh
Part of the Globalization and Governance book series (GLOGOV)

Abstract

Globalization has become a magic word in the last decades, first of all after the collapse of the bipolar world order. It has been understood in many ways and in many fields as if the so called ‘Global Challenge’ had acted as an omnipotent and omnipresent force - inevitably and with the same consequences everywhere (see, Waterman 1996 and Power 1997). When we discuss, however, the transformation of East Central Europe (ECE - Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Croatia) in an inter-regional comparison, we can identify both its ambiguous, dual (positive and negative) effects and indirect consequences or side-effects. It must also be emphasized that globalization has increased the parallel and counterbalancing processes of regionalization. Thus, an inter-regional comparison clearly suggests that all regions have met the global challenge in their own specific way, that is with a particular mixture of positive and negative responses, and with some characteristic side effects.1

Keywords

Global Challenge Balkan Country East Central Reverse Wave Snowball Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ágh, A. (1995) ‘The Paradoxes of Transition: The External and Internal Overload of the Transition Process’, in Cox T., and A. Furlong (eds), Hungary: The Politics of Transition, London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  2. Ágh, A. (1997) ‘Small Central European States Facing an Active Future: A Case of Linkage Politics’, Budapest Papers on Democratic Transition, No. 200.Google Scholar
  3. Ágh, A. (1998) The Politics of Central Europe, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ágh, A. and G. Ilonszki (eds) (1996) Parliaments and Organised Interests in Central Europe: The Second Steps, Budapest: Hungarian Centre for Democracy Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Bideleux, R. (1996) ‘Bringing the East back in’, in Bideleux R., and R. Taylor (eds), European Integration and Disintegration: East and West, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brie, M. (1996) ‘Russland: Das Entstehen einer delegierten Demokratie’, in W. Merkel, E. Sandschneider and D. Segret (eds), Systemwechsel 2, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  7. Crawford, B. and A. Lijphart (eds) (1997) Liberalization and Leninist Legacies: Comparative Perspectives on Democratic Transition, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford and Lijphart, (1997).Google Scholar
  9. Croan, M. (organized and introduced) (1992) ‘Is Latin America the Future of Eastern Europe? A Symposium’, Problems of Communism, May–June 1992 (with the participation of Thomas Skidmore, David Ost, Lawrence Graham and Eric Hershberg).Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Diamond, L. and M. Plattner (eds) (1993) The Global Resurgence of Democracy, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Featherstone, M. (ed.) (1991) Global Culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Gaubatz, K. T. (1996) ‘Kant, Democracy, and History’, Journal of Democracy, 7 (4), October 1996.Google Scholar
  14. Gerlich, P. (1995) ‘Political dissatisfaction in the new Europe’, in P. Gerlich and K. Glass (eds), Der schwierige Selbstfindungsprozess, Wien and Torun: Österreichische Gesellschaft für Mitteleuropäische Studien.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1993) Vergangenheit als Zukunft, Frankfurt: Piper.Google Scholar
  16. Hann, C. (1995), ‘Subverting Strong States: The Dialectics of Social Engineering in Hungary and Turkey’, Daedalus, 124 (2), Spring 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Huntington, S. (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  18. Huntington, S. (1996a) The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  19. Huntington, S. (1996b) ‘Democracy for the Long Haul’, Journal of Democracy, 7 (2).Google Scholar
  20. LeDuc, L., R. Niemi and P. Noris (eds) (1996) Comparing Democracies, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, P. (1995) ‘Democratization in Eastern Europe’, in Pridham (1995).Google Scholar
  22. Luif, P. (1995) On the Road to Brussels: The Political Dimension of Austria’s, Find-land’s and Sweden’s Accession to the European Union, Vienna: Braumüller.Google Scholar
  23. Mansilla, H. C. F. (1995) ‘Partielle Modernisierung und politische Kultur des Authoritarismus in der Peripherie’, International Politics and Society, (FES), No. 1, January 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Merkel, W. (1995) ‘Deepening or Widening? The Limits of European Integration’, in M. Szabó (ed.), The Challenge of Europeanization in the Region: East Central Europe, Budapest: Hungarian Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  25. Messner, D. and J. Meyer-Stamer (1992). Meyer-Stamer (1992) ‘Latinamerikanische Schwellenländer: Vorbild für Osteuropa?’, FES Vierteljahre Berichte, September 1992.Google Scholar
  26. Millard, F. (1996) ‘Poland’s “return to Europe”, 1989–94’, in Bideleux R. and R. Taylor (eds), European Integration and Disintegration: East and West, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. O’Donnell, G. (1993) On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries’, World Development, 21 (8).Google Scholar
  28. O’Donnell, G. (1994) ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5 (1), January 1994.Google Scholar
  29. Offe, C. (1991) ‘Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe’, Social Research, 58 (4).Google Scholar
  30. Power, G. (1997) ‘Globalization and its Discontents’, Development, Globalization: Opening up spaces for civiv engagement, 40 (2), June 1997.Google Scholar
  31. Pridham, G. (ed.) (1995) Transitions to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives from Southern Europe, Latin America and Eastern Europe, Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  32. Przeworski, A. (1991) Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmidt, V. (1995) ‘The New World Order, Incorporated: The Rise of Business and the Decline of the Nation-State’, Daedalus, 124 (2), Spring 1995.Google Scholar
  34. Schmitter, P. and T. Karl (1992) ‘The Types of Democracy Emerging in Southern and Eastern Europe and South and Central America’, in Volten P. (ed.), Bound to Change: Consolidating Democracy in East Central Europe, New York and Prague: Institute for EastWest Studies, distributed by the Westview Press.Google Scholar
  35. Soroos, M. (1986) Beyond Sovereignty: The Challenge of Global Policy, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  36. Urquhart, B. and E. Childers (1996) A World in Need of Leadership: Tomorrow’s United Nations, Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Vuylsteke, R. (1995), ‘Third Wave Democracies: Building Democratic Staying Power’, Free China Review, 45 (11), November 1995.Google Scholar
  38. Waterman, P. (1996) ‘Beyond Globalism and Developmentalism: Other Voices in World Politics’, Development and Change, 27 (1).Google Scholar
  39. Weyland, K. (1995) ‘Latin America’s Four Political Models’, Journal of Democracy, 6 (4), October 1995.Google Scholar
  40. Woo-Cumings, M. (1994) ‘The ‘New Authoritarianism” in East Asia’, Current History, December 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Press Ltd 2000 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Attila Ágh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations