Politics

  • Andrew Hadfield
Part of the Palgrave Advances book series (PAD)

Abstract

In 1648, fifty years after Spenser’s death, a section of The Faerie Queene was published separately in a small quarto of eleven printed pages. The work consisted of twenty-five verses from Spenser’s magnum opus, (V.ii.29–54), detailing Artegall’s defeat of the Giant with the Scales, obviously recognised then as now, as one of the key political passages in the work (Patterson 1992; O’Connell 1990b). The extract was given the grand title, The faerie leveller, or, King Charles his leveller descried and deciphered in Queene Elizabeths dayes by her poet laureat Edmond Spenser, in his unparaleld poeme entituled, The faerie qveene, a lively representation of our times. The last phrase is the key to reading the text, an insight developed in the prefatory material which argues that ‘the Prince of English Poets Edmund Spenser’ wrote verses which ‘then propheticall are now become historicall in our dayes’ (3). Spenser’s story of the knight of Justice arguing with the Giant who tries to impose universal equality by weighing everything in his scales, before throwing him off a cliff, is interpreted as a royalist fable. Artegall is King Charles; Talus is ‘The Kings forces’; ‘The Giant Leveller’ is ‘Col. Oliver Cromwell’ (4).

Keywords

Virgin Queen Historicist Critic Book Versus Lively Representation English Poet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  1. Aptekar, J. 1969. Icons of Justice: Iconography and Thematic Imagery in theFaerie Queene; Book V, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cain, T. H. 1978. Praise in The Faerie Queene’, Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  3. Canny, N. 2000. ‘The Social and Political Thought of Spenser in His Maturity’, in Jennifer Klein Morrison and Matthew Greenfield, eds, Edmund Spenser: Essays on Culture and Allegory, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 107–22.Google Scholar
  4. Fowler, E. 1995. ‘The Failure of Moral Philosophy in the Work of Edmund Spenser’, Representations 51: 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hackett, H. 1995. Virgin Mother, Maiden Queen: Elizabeth I and the Cult of the Virgin Mary, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Hadfield, A. 1998. ‘Was Spenser a Republican?’, English 47: 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McCabe, R. A. 1987. ‘The Masks of Duessa: Spenser, Mary Queen of Scots, and James VI’, ELR 17: 224–42.Google Scholar
  8. McLane, P. E. 1961. Spenser’sShepheardes Calender’: A Study in Elizabethan Allegory, Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Montrose, L. 2002. ‘Spenser and the Elizabethan Political Imaginary’, ELH 69: 907–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Norbrook, D. 2002. Poetry and Politics in the English Renaissance, rev. edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. O’Connell, M. 1977. Mirror and Veil: The Historical Dimension of Spenser’s Faerie Queene, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  12. Suttie, P. 1998. ‘Edmund Spenser’s Political Pragmatism’, Studies in Philology 95: 56–76.Google Scholar
  13. Wilson-Okamura, D. S. 2002. ‘Spenser and the Two Queens’, ELR 32: 62–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew Hadfield 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Hadfield

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations