Advertisement

China’s Ability To Take a Military Option and Its Calculations

  • June Teufel Dreyer
Part of the St Antony’s Series book series

Abstract

For two decades, the PRC vowed that it would invade Taiwan if any one of three circumstances occurred:
  • if Taiwan were to seek the support of foreign powers other than the United States;

  • if there were to be social disorder on Taiwan; or

  • if Taiwan were to declare independence.

Keywords

Former Soviet Union Aircraft Carrier Eastern Economic Review Cruise Missile Central Military Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For Lee Teng-hui’s account of this process, see Lee Teng-hui, Zhizheng gao baishilu (The True Record of [My] Administration), Taipei, INK publishers, 1999, particularly chapters one and two.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    John Culver and Michael Pillsbury, ‘Defense Policy and Posture II’, in Hank Binnendijk and Ronald N. Montaperto, eds, Strategic Trends in China (Washington, DC, 1998, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University), 72.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    See, for example, Peng Weixue, ‘A Penetrating Look At ‘Gradual Taiwan Independence’, Liaowang (Beijing), 18 Mar. 2002, FBIS CPP20020322000060.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Mark A. Stokes, China’s Strategic Modernization: Implications for the United States’, US army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle PA, 1999, 93.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    For the strategy debate engendered by the Kosovo confrontation, see June Teufel Dreyer. ‘The PLA and Kosovo: A Strategy Debate’, Issues and Studies, vol. 36, no. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2000), 100–119.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    An Weiping, ‘Thoughts on Developing Armaments By Leaps And Bounds’, Jiefangjun bao, 6 Apr. 1999, FBIS 19990400023.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Qiao Liang and Wang Xianghui, Chaoxian zhan (War Beyond Boundaries) (Beijing, 1999: PLA Literature and Arts Press), passim.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    MGN Dai Qingmin, ‘Introduction to Integrated Network-Electronic Warfare’, Jiefangjun bao, 26 Feb. 2002, 6, FBIS CPP20020226000078. General Dai is Director of the PLA General Staff’s Communications Department.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    LTG Lin Ch’in-ching (Abe C. Lin), ‘Chaoxian zhan de diyi xian’ (The First Line of War Beyond Boundaries), Guofang zhengce pinglun (Taiwan Defence Affairs), vol. 1, no. 4 (Summer 2001), 126.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Eric Lichtblau, ‘CIA Warns Of Chinese Plans For Syber-Attacks On US Defense: Analysts Fear Government and Private Efforts To Sabotage Federal Internet Sites’, Los Angeles Times, 25 Apr. 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), The Military Balance 2001–2002 (London, 2001: Oxford University Press), 190.Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    IISS, p. 190; Richard Fisher, ‘PRC’s Missiles Are Scary, But So Is Its Air Force’, Taiwan Outlook, vol. 2, no. 3 (May 2002), 6.Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    The SS/N-22 Moskit, also known as the Sunburn, missile travels at two and a half times the speed of sound, skimming the water in a very low flight pattern. It is moreover capable of what American naval sources term extremely agile end-manoeuvres to evade defences. The navy’s Phalanx system can detect the Moskit, but has less than three seconds to calculate a fire solution, which is not enough time to stop the 750-pound warhead. See Charles Smith, ‘Navy To Get Russian ‘Sunburn’ Advanced Missile. Nuclear Warhead Version Already in China’s Hands’, ChinaGate, 25 Apr. 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    Leigh Jenkins, ‘Soviet-Built “Casino” Aircraft Carrier Moored Under High Security in Dalian’, Hong Kong, South China Morning Post, 12 May 2002, 3.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    Jin Shaoyang, ‘Mainland Has Ability in Seizing Beaches and Attacking Taiwan Independence’, Wen Wei Po (Hong Kong), 17 May 2002, in FBIS 20020517000011.Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    Wu Xudong and Zhang Xuanjie, ‘About Twenty Percent of Officers Serving in China’s Strategic Missile Units Come From Colleges and Universities Across the Country’, Beijing, Xinhua, 29 Apr. 2002.Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    Thomas Ricks, ‘Taiwan Seen As Vulnerable To Attack’, Washington Post, 31 Mar. 2000Google Scholar
  18. see also Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough, ‘Inside the Ring: Taiwan Report Held’, Washington Times, 31 Mar. 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 34.
    Herman Pan and Sofia Wu, ‘US Arms Sales To Taiwan Down 62.4 Per cent in FY 1999’, Central News Agency, (Taipei) Washington, DC, 17 Apr. 2000.Google Scholar
  20. 35.
    Larry Wortzel, ‘Bush Wrestles With Arms Sales’, Taipei Times, 25 Apr. 2001.Google Scholar
  21. 37.
    Brian Hsu, ‘Lafayette Machine Guns Getting Rusty’, Taipei Times, 25 Mar. 2001.Google Scholar
  22. 38.
    International Institute for Strategic Studies, ‘Taiwan’s Military: Assessing Strengths and Weaknesses’, Strategic Comments, vol. 6, no. 4 (May 2000), 6; Maureen Pao, ‘What George W. Doesn’t Know’, Far Eastern Economic Review, 12 April 2001, 20–21.Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    Brian Hsu, ‘Military To Start Its Final Downsizing Program in 2006’, Taipei Times, 17 May 2002.Google Scholar
  24. 41.
    Sofia Wu, ‘Hankuang No. 17’ Exercise To Start in Early April’, CNA (Taipei), 7 Mar. 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 43.
    Chien Chung, ‘Gongjun gaojishu fan-Tai zhanzheng de junbei: ruhe yi zhan bixiang’ (The Communist Military’s High-tech War Preparations Against Taiwan: How To Compel Surrender), Guofang zhengce pinglun (Taiwan Defence Affairs), Oct. 2001, 161–2.Google Scholar
  26. 45.
    Carl Ford, ‘Pentagon Report Makes Case For Sale of Aegis To Taiwan’, undated but approximately 29 January 2001. www.taiwanstudies.org/tsi/publications/taiwanoutlook Google Scholar
  27. 46.
    John Pomfret and Steven Mufson, ‘China Lobbies To Block An Arms Sale To Taiwan’, Washington Post, 3 Mar. 2001, A14.Google Scholar
  28. 48.
    For example, by Sofia Wu, ‘MND Mum On Report of U.S. Plan To Freeze Large Arms Sales To Taiwan’, Central News Agency (Taipei) 21 May 2002.Google Scholar
  29. 54.
    Sofia Wu, ‘Defense Minister Stresses Need To Buy Kidd-Class Destroyers’, CNA (Taipei), 15 May 2002Google Scholar
  30. Brian Hsu, ‘Taiwan Needs Kidds, MND’s Tang Says’, Taipei Times, 16 May 2002.Google Scholar
  31. 55.
    Brian Hsu, ‘Navy Confident It Will Acquire Aegis Destroyers From US’, Taipei Times, 22 May 2002; Dr Steve Tsang, personal communication to the author, 21 May 2002.Google Scholar
  32. 56.
    Brian Hsu, ‘Military Receives Funds For Integrated Communications Systems’, Taipei Times, 9 May 2002.Google Scholar
  33. 57.
    Klaus Lederer, ‘Babcock Verkauft Antiele An HDW-Werft’ (Babcock Sells Shares In HDW Shipyard) , Handelsblatt, 11 Mar. 2002. The sale was irregular in that Babcock’s shareholders were not asked to approve the sale, as they should have been, arousing suspicions of high-level governmental intervention.Google Scholar
  34. 58.
    Brian Hsu, ‘US Agrees To Sell Twenty Anti-Radiation Missiles For F-16s’, Taipei Times, 20 May 2002. HARMs were used effectively against Iraq’s air defence radar during the Gulf War and are expected to be used against the PRC’s S-300 air defence network in time of conflict. They cost a reported $300,000 each. Since no training missiles were included, the air force is reluctant to launch live-fire tests.Google Scholar
  35. 60.
    In the first half of 2002, Jiefangjun bao ran a multi-part series calling for officers to respect the rights of soldiers. See, for example, Xun Hengdong, ‘Properly Handle the Relationships Between Officers and Men In Military Administrative Law’, Jiefangjun bao, 17 Feb. 2002, 3, in FBIS 20020221000071.Google Scholar
  36. 61.
    Xi Shigang, Zhuang Lijun, and Tu Xueneng, ‘Report On Development of Scientific and Technological Senior Personnel By Arms Department of PLA General Staff Headquarters’, Jiefangjun bao 29 Apr. 2002, 2, in FBIS 20020429000134.Google Scholar
  37. 62.
    Du Shuren, ‘Resist Vulgar Ties, Purify Barracks — Survey and Reflection On Phenomenon of ‘Servicemen With Special Ties’, Jiefangjun bao, 21 Feb. 2002, in FBIS 20020221000118.Google Scholar
  38. 63.
    For example, Yu Chuanxin, ‘A Few Issues Concerning Logistic Support For the Cross-Strait Amphibious Landing Operation’, Military Economic Studies, Jan. 2001.Google Scholar
  39. 64.
    Kuo Ping, ‘A Perspective Of Taiwan’s Military Defensive Lines’, Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong), 11 Dec. 2000, in FBIS 20001211000046.Google Scholar
  40. 65.
    Xu Bodong, ‘Peace Will Prevail Only When the Two Sides of the Strait Are Reunified: Interview With MGN Huang Bin, Noted Strategist On Mainland’, Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong), 13 May 2002, in FBIS CPP20020513000048.Google Scholar
  41. 66.
    Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough, ‘Inside the Ring: China Prep’, Washington Times, 19 Jan. 2001.Google Scholar
  42. 68.
    Wang Jiasuo, ‘Aircraft Carriers: Suggest You Keep Out Of The Taiwan Strait’, Junshi wenzhai (Military Digest), Beijing, 1 Apr. 2002, 58–59, FBIS CPP20020326000218.Google Scholar
  43. 69.
    Richard Fisher, ‘To Take Taiwan, First Kill A Carrier’, China Brief, (Washington, DC: Jamestown Foundation) vol. 2, no. 14, 8 July 2002, 11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • June Teufel Dreyer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations