Advertisement

Political Culture, Alternative Politics and Democracy in Greater China

  • David Zweig
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

What forces and circumstances lead people in Asian societies to turn from formal democratic institutions to alternative institutions or extra-institutional political action?1 According to Rocamora, when elections are controlled by central or local oligarchies, citizens in East Asia form civic organizations or non-governmental organizations (NGOs), join social movements, or turn to social protest (Rocamora 2000). This chapter addresses this issue in three Chinese societies that are part of Greater China: Taiwan, Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland. In this way, we can account for the impact of Confucian culture on political behaviour, and highlight the role of democratic values and political structures on the decision to rely on formal versus alternative politics. Also, rather than accepting that democratic institutions failed in these societies, I chose to treat the assertion that people had to turn to alternative democracy as a hypothesis to be tested empirically.

Keywords

Political Party Political Culture Chinese Communist Party Political Structure Democratic Institution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, T.P. and L. Xiaobo (2000), ‘Taxation without Representation: Peasants, the Central and the Local States in Reform China’, The China Quarterly, 163: 742–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, T.P. (1998), ‘Instability in Rural China?’ in David Shambaugh, ed., Is China Unstable? Assessing the Factors, Washington, DC: The Sigur Centre for Asian Studies: 93–110.Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, C. (2000), ‘From “City of Light” to “City of Protest”’, International Herald Tribune, 29 June: 7.Google Scholar
  4. Degolyer, M.E. and J.L. Scott (1997), ‘The Myth of Political Apathy in Hong Kong’, Max J. Skidmore, ed., Hong Kong and China: Pursuing a New Destiny, Singapore: Toppan Company: 68–78.Google Scholar
  5. Hing, L.S. (1998), ‘Political Parties Elite-Mass Gap and Political Instability in Hong Kong’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 20(1): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hu, F. (1993), ‘The Electoral Mechanism and Political Change in Taiwan’, in Steve Tsang, ed., In the Shadow of China: Political Development in Taiwan since1949, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press: 134–168.Google Scholar
  7. Jakobsen, L. (1999), ‘Blazing New Trails: Villagers’ Committee Elections in P.R. China’, UPI Working Papers: Helsinki: 19: 13–16.Google Scholar
  8. Jennings, K. (2000), ‘Surveying China’, paper presented at the conference at George Washington University, Washington, DC, June 9–10, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Kau, M.Y. (1996), ‘The Political Structure in Taiwan’s Political Economy’, Asian Survey, 36(3): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lau, S. and K. Hsin-chi (2000), ‘Partial Democratization, “Foundation Moment”, and Political Parties in Hong Kong’, The China Quarterly, 163: 705–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lau, S. (2000), ‘Hong Kong’s Partial Democracy under Stress’, paper presented at the 10th Anniversary Conference on Into the 21st Century: Challenges for Hong Kong and the Asia-Pacific Region, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 13–15 April 2000.Google Scholar
  12. Li, L. and K. O’Brien, ‘The Struggle over Village Elections’, in Merle Goldman & Roderick MacFarquhar, eds., The Paradox of China’s post-Mao Reforms, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 129–44.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, M. (2000), ‘The Party’s Over’, Far Eastern Economic Review, June 8: 26, 28.Google Scholar
  14. National Police Administration (1998), Shehui zhibiao tongji (Social Indicators), Taipei: Ministry of Interior.Google Scholar
  15. Parish, W.L. and C.C. Chang (1996), ‘Political Values in Taiwan: Sources of Change and Constancy’, in Hung-mao Tien, ed., Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe: 27–41.Google Scholar
  16. Pennock, J.R. (1979), Democratic Political Theory Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pye, L.W. (1985), Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rocamora, J. (2000), ‘Formal Democracy and Its Alternatives in the Philippines: Parties, Elections and Social Movements’, paper prepared for conference on ‘Democracy and Civil Society in Asia: The Emerging Opportunities and Challenges’, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, 19–21 August.Google Scholar
  19. Shi, T. (2000), ‘Political Culture: A Prerequisite for Democracy?’ American Asian Review, 18(2): 53–83.Google Scholar
  20. Shiao, C. (1999), ‘Civil Society and Democratization’, in Steve Tsang and Hungmao Tien, eds., Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China, New York: St. Martin’s press: 101–15.Google Scholar
  21. Tang, S. and C. Tang (1997), ‘Democratization and Environmental Politics in Taiwan’, Asian Survey, 37(3): 284–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Woodman, S. (1999), ‘Less Dressed up as More? Promoting Non-Profit Organisations by Regulating Away Freedom of Association’, China Perspectives, 22: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zakariah, F. (1997), ’ The Rise of Illiberal Democracy’, Foreign Affairs, 76(6): 22–43.Google Scholar
  24. Zweig, D. (2000), ‘The “Externalities of Development”: Can New Political Institutions Manage Rural Conflict?’ in Elizabeth J. Perry and Mark Selden, eds., Contemporary Chinese Society: Social Conflict and Popular Protest, London: Routledge: 120–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Zweig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations