Aspects of Anti-Crop BW Activity in France, Germany and Japan

  • Simon M. Whitby
Part of the Global Issues Series book series (GLOISS)

Abstract

Debate concerning both defensive and offensive aspects of BW research and developments in the US was fuelled by perceptions of enemy activity in relation to BW. A series of press articles by British journalist Wickham Steed emerged as early as 1934 claiming that Germany was planning BW attacks on the Paris and London Undergrounds, but these and other stories relating the dangers posed by a variety of hypothetical covert BW scenarios against targets in Europe and the US, were afforded little credence by Washington.1

Keywords

Phytophthora Infestans Plant Parasite Biological Warfare Colorado Beetle London Underground 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    S. Harris, Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare, 1932–45, and the American Cover-Up, Routledge, New York, 1994, p. 150.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.J. Bernstein, ‘The Birth of the U.S. Biological-Warfare Program’, Scientific American, Vol. 256, June 1987, p.97. Although such preparations were indeed made, according to Franz et al., the inoculation of 100,000 troops did not take place.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. See, J.L. Middlebrook and D.R. Franz, ‘Botulinum Toxins’, in D.R. Franz, E.T. Takafuji and F.R. Sidell, (eds), Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare, Office of the Surgeon General, US Army, Falls Church, Virginia, 1997, p 644. This matter is discussed in some considerable detailGoogle Scholar
  4. by Donald Avery, ‘Canadian Biological and Toxin Warfare Research, Development and Planning, 1925–45’, in E. Geissler and J.E. van Courtland Moon (eds), Biological and Toxin Weapons: Research, Development and Use from the Middle Ages to 1945, SIPRI Chemical and Biological Warfare Study, No. 18, 1999, pp.190–1.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    According to SIPRI, ‘The UK maintained a substantial stockpile of chemical weapons until around 1957’ The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare: CB Weapons Today, Vol. II, SIPRI, Humanities Press, New York, 1973, p.190.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Hugh-Jones, Wicham Steed and German Biological Warfare Research, Intelligence and National Security, Vol. 7, No. 4 (1992), pp.379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 20.
    Sheldon Harris, ‘Japanese Biological Warfare Research on Humans: A Case Study of Microbiology and Ethics’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1996, p.33.Google Scholar
  8. 24.
    Peter Williams and David Wallace, Unit 731: the Japanese Army’s Secret of Secrets, St Edmundsbury Press Limited, 1989, p.75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Simon M. Whitby 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon M. Whitby
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Peace StudiesUniversity of BradfordUK

Personalised recommendations