Merging Identities, Reinventing Boundaries: The Survival Strategy of Catholic Development Aid in the Netherlands

  • Frans Kamsteeg
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a detailed study of a merging process of three Dutch Catholic organizations providing development aid. It is a story of how the deconstruction of boundaries between organizations provokes the reinvention of boundaries between different groups of people within the new organization. This story is put in the context of a society in which ideological boundaries between population groups gradually become less visible, but nevertheless continue to be a pervasive organizing principle. I therefore put Cordaid - the name of the new merger organization - in the context of the peculiarities of this Dutch “pillar-ization” model of civil society. Private development aid was shaped by various ideologies that also shaped any other sector outside the market and government sector. Ideology, most often religious ideology, was the dominant source of corporate identity. The discussion in this chapter presents the Cordaid merger as a management effort to keep up with the triumph of the market ideology, popular in the last quarter of the twentieth century, while simultaneously keeping up with the tradition of pillarization.

Keywords

Social Identity Organization Member Organizational Identity Social Identity Theory Merging Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, Stuart and David A. Whetten. 1985. Organizational identity. In Research in Organizational Behavio., edited by L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, 363–95. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Vernon L, David A. Wilder, and Michael L. Atkinson. 1983. Multiple group membership and social identity. In Studies in Social Identit., edited by Theodore R. Sarbin and Karl E. Scheibe, 92–115. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, Mats. 1990. Organization: From substance to image? Organization Studie. 11 (3): 373–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth, Frederik, ed. 1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Bergen, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  5. Barth, Frederik. 2000. Boundaries and connections. In Signifying identities: Anthropological perspectives on boundaries and contested value., edited by Anthony P. Cohen, 17–36. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, Anthony P. 1985. The symbolic construction of community. London: Tavistock Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, Anthony P., ed. 2000. Signifying identities: Anthropological perspectives on boundaries and contested values. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cordaid. 2001. Annual Report Cordaid 2000. Den Haag: Cordaid.Google Scholar
  9. Eriksen, T. H. 1993. Ethnicity and nationalism: Anthropological perspectives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Etzioni, Amitai. 1975 [1961]. A comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power, involvement, and their correlates. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, Erving. 1971 [1959]. The presentation of the self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  12. Gioia, Dennis A. 1998. From individual to organizational identity. In Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversation., edited by David A. Whetten and Paul C. Godfrey, 17–32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hope, Peter L., Lucas C. P. M. Meijs, and Marianne H. Vorthoren. 2000. Hybrid governance: The impact of the non-profit sector in the Netherlands. Rijswijk: Sociaal-Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, Richard. 1996. Social identity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamsteeg, Frans H. 1998. Prophetic Pentecostalism in Chile: A case study on religion and development policy. London: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kamsteeg, Frans H. 1999. Ideology, trust and cooperation: A Dutch-Chilean case of development policy. In Trust and cooperation: Symbolic exchange and moral economies in an age of cultural differentiatio., edited by Peer Smets, Harry Wels, and Joost van Loon, 119–37. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  17. Kunda, Gideon. 1992. Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Martin, Joanne. 1992. Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pratt, Michael G. 1998. To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversation., edited by David A. Whetten and Paul C. Godfrey, 171–208. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stuurgroep. 1991. Betekenis van het medefinancieringsprogramma: Een verkennin. (Impact of the cofinancing program: An exploration). Oegstgeest, the Netherlands: GOM.Google Scholar
  22. Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1985. The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In Psychology of intergroup relation., edited by S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Frans Kamsteeg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frans Kamsteeg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations