Control Mechanisms and Patterns of Reorganization in MNCs

  • Florian Becker-Ritterspach
  • Knut Lange
  • Karin Lohr
Chapter

Abstract

Current management and organizational research seems to agree in one respect: that management faces new challenges resulting mainly from globalization, whether it is real or perceived. Clearly, national corporations as much as MNCs feel the need to respond to new market conditions by reorganizing their businesses on a permanent basis. These changes concern structural configurations as much as flows of all kinds of resources including products, people and capital. However, in our empirical research we looked more closely at such reorganizations and found that even MNCs operating in the same industry were by no means responding to the challenges of globalization in a uniform or convergent way. Despite some similar trends, the types of reorganization, as well as the way the reorganization process developed, diverged from one company to the other. Searching for answers, we found that different dominant control mechanisms were key factors in explaining the divergent patterns of reorganization. Although our research topic is only indirectly linked to the general convergence—divergence debate in the context of globalization (see Ohmae, 1990; Maurice and Sorge, 2000; Morgan et al., 2001), we may nevertheless contribute to it. As will be outlined in our chapter, our findings on the connection between control mechanisms and patterns of reorganization indicate that there is as much convergence as divergence.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Control Mechanism Output Control Multinational Firm Local Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, N., Deiß, M., Döhl, V. and Sauer, D. (1986) ‘Ein “Neuer Rationalisierungstyp” — neue Anforderungen an die Industriesoziologie’, Soziale Welt, 37, pp. 191–207.Google Scholar
  2. Baliga, B. R. and Jaeger, A. M. (1984) ‘Multinational Corporations: Control Systems and Delegation Issues’, Journal of International Business Studies, 15 (Fall), pp. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. (1987) ‘Managing across Borders: New Strategic Requirements’, Sloan Management Review, 28, pp. 7–17.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becerra, M. (1998) Control of National Subsidiaries: A Critical Assessment and Future Research Directions, paper presented in 2001 at the Founding Conference of the European Academy of Management in Barcelona.Google Scholar
  6. Becker-Ritterspach, F., Lange, K. and Lohr, K. (2001a) Do European Corporate Coordination and Control Systems Converge? Paper presented at the Founding Conference of the European Academy of Management in Barcelona.Google Scholar
  7. Becker-Ritterspach, F., Lange, K. and Lohr, K. (2001b) The Micro-Coevolution of an Organisational Model in a Multinational Corporation: Bringing Actors into the Coevolutionary Framework, paper presented at the EGOS conference in Lyon.Google Scholar
  8. Blau, P. M. and Scott, W. R. (1963) Formal Organizations, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, G. and Dunning, J. H. (1999) Structural Change and Cooperation in the Global Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Boyer, R. (1992) ‘Neue Richtungen von Managementpraktiken und Arbeitsorganisation’, in Demirovic, A. (ed.) Hegemonie und Staat. Kapitalistische Regulation als Projekt und Prozeß Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 55–103.Google Scholar
  11. Cerny, P. (1997) ‘International Finance and the Erosion of Capitalist Diversity’, in Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (eds) Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, London: Sage, pp. 173–81.Google Scholar
  12. Chandler, A. D. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Child, J. (1973) ‘Strategies of Control and Organization Behaviour’, ASQ, 18, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, R. (1998) Schlank zur Spitze. Mit Konfrontationsstrategien ins 21. Jahrhundert, München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  15. Deutschmann, C., Faust, M., Jauch, P. and Notz, P. (1995) ‘Veränderungen der Rolle des Managements im Prozeß reflexiver Rationalisierung’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 24 (6), pp. 436–50.Google Scholar
  16. Dore, R. (2000) Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism. Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunning, J. H. (1994) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K. (1989) ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review, 14/4, pp. 532–50.Google Scholar
  19. Flick, U. (1996) Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften, Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  20. Geppert, M., Williams, K. and Matten, D. (forthcoming) ‘The Social Construction of Change Management in MNCs: An Anglo-German Comparison’, Journal of Management Studies.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993) Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifestofor Business Revolution, New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  23. Harzing, A. K. (1999) Managing the Multinationals. An International Study of Control Mechanisms, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  24. Hedlund, G. (1993) ‘Assumption of Hierarchy and Heterarchy, with Applications to the Management of the Multinational Corporation’, in Ghoshal, S. and Westney, D. E. (eds) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hennart, J.-F. (1993) ‘Control in Multinational Firms: The Role of Price and Hierarchy’ in Ghoshal, S. and Westney, D. E. (eds) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (1997) ‘Weltmarkt und Wandel der Unternehmensstrategien. Grenzen der Globalisierung’, in Hradil, S. (ed.) Differenz und Integration. Die Zukunft moderner Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des28. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Dresden 1996, Kongressbd. 1, Frankfurt a.M./New York, Campus, pp. 726–39.Google Scholar
  27. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (1998) ‘Shareholder Value: Unternehmensstrategien und neue Strukturen des Kapitalmarktes’, in Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. and Wolf, H. (eds) Arbeit, Gesellschaft, Kritik. Orientierungen wider den Zeitgeist, Berlin: Edition Sigma, pp. 195–222.Google Scholar
  28. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (1999) ‘Shareholder Value. Zum Wandel von Unternehmenstrukturen und Kapitalmarktbedingungen’, WSI-Mitteilungen, 5.Google Scholar
  29. Iwer, F. (2000) ‘Projektabschlußbericht. Innovationstrends in der Aufzugsindustrie und Folgen für die Beschäftigungssituation, Branchenstudie im Auftrag des Hauptvorstandes der IG Metall im Rahmen des Kooperationsprojekts RKEDGB, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  30. Jürgens, U., Rupp, J., Vitols, K. and Jäschke-Werthmann, K. (2000) Corporate Governance und Shareholder Value in Deutschland. Nach dem Fall von Mannesmann — Paper revisited, WZB Discussion Chapter, FS II 00–202.Google Scholar
  31. Kern, H. and Schumann, M. (1984) Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion: Bestandsaufnahme, Trendbestimmung, München: Beck.Google Scholar
  32. Kieser, A. (1998) ‘Uber die allmähliche Verfertigung der Organisation beim Reden. Organisieren als Kommunizieren’, Industrielle Beziehungen, 1, 1–40.Google Scholar
  33. Lane, C. (2000) ‘Understanding the Globalization Strategies of German and British Multinational Companies: Is a “Societal Effect” Approach Still Useful?’, in Maurice, M. and Sorge, A. (eds) Embedding Organizations: Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-Economic Context, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lane, C. (2001) ‘The Emergence of German Transnational Companies: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Study of The Globalization Process’, in Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. (eds) The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 69–96.Google Scholar
  35. Macharzina, K. (1996) ‘Globalisierung als Unternehmensaufgabe. Strategien und Organisation, Kriterien für Standortentscheidungen’, in Steger, U. (ed.) Globalisierung der Wirtschaft. Konsequenzen für Arbeit, Technik und Umwelt, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1972) ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, ASQ, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958) Organizations, New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Marschan, R., Welch, D. and Welch, L. (1999): ‘In the Shadow: The Impact of Language on Structure, Power and Communication in the Multinational’, International Business Review, 8, 421–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maurice, M. and Sorge, A. (eds) (2000) Embedding Organizations: Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-Economic Context, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  40. Miles, M. and Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Mintzberg, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power In and Around Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, G. (2001) ‘The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides’, in Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. (eds) The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford: University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  44. Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. (eds) (2001) The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Nippa, M. and Picot, A. (eds) (1995) Prozessmanagement und Reengineering. Die Praxis im deutschsprachigen Raum, Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  46. Ohmae, K. (1990) The Borderless World, New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  47. Ortmann, G., Sydow, J. and Windeler, A. (1997) ‘Organisation als reflexive Strukturation’, in Ortmann, G., Sydow, J. and Türk, K. (eds) Theorien der Organisation. Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, pp. 315–54.Google Scholar
  48. Ouchi, W. G. (1980) ‘Markets, bureaucracies and clans’, ASQ, 25, pp. 120–42.Google Scholar
  49. Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Rappaport, A. (1986) Creating Shareholder Value — The New Standard for Business Performance, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Ruigrok, W. and van Tulder, R. (1995) The Logic of International Restructuring, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Sauer, D. and Döhl, V. (1997) ‘Die Auflösung des Unternehmens? — Entwicklungstendenzen der Unternehmensreorganisation’, in IfS, Jahrbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Technikberichterstattung. Schwerpunkt: Reorganisation, München/ Berlin, pp. 19–75.Google Scholar
  53. Sorge, A. (1993) ‘Arbeit, Organisation und Arbeitsbeziehungen in Ostdeutschland’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, Heft 4, pp. 549–67.Google Scholar
  54. Tainio, R., Huolman, M. and Pulkkinen, M. (2001) ‘The Internationalization of Capital Markets: How International Institutional Investors are restructuring Finnish Companies’, in Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. (eds) The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford: University Press, pp. 153–71.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, J. D. (1967) Organisations in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  56. Thompson, G. and Frances, J. (eds) (1993) Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination by Social Life, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Trist, E. (1981) The Evolution of Socio-technical Systems. A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program, Toronto: Ontario Quality of Working Life Center, Occasional paper no. 2.Google Scholar
  58. Weber, M. (1922/1972) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
  59. Yin, R. K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mike Geppert, Dirk Matten and Karen Williams 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Becker-Ritterspach
  • Knut Lange
  • Karin Lohr

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations