Towards the Peacebuilding Consensus

William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, Oxford Paperbacks, 1975.Google Scholar

For more on these ‘generations’ of approaches to ending conflict see Oliver P. Richmond, Maintaining Order, Making Peace, London: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar

Michael Mandelbaum, The Ideas that Conquered the World, New York: Public Affairs, 2002, p. 6.Google Scholar

See Walter Isard, Understanding conflict and the science ofpeace, Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992, esp. chapters 2, 4 and 5.Google Scholar

See E.A. Azar, ‘Protracted International Conflicts: Ten Propositions’, in J. Burton and E.A. Azar, International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Wheatsheaf Books, 1986, p. 29: Ted Robert Gurr, Why Men Rebel, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

John Macmillan, ‘Whose Democracy, Which Peace?’ Paper presented at ECPR, Marburg, September 2003, p. 1 and p. 19.Google Scholar

Ted Robert Gurr, op. cit.: Dollard, Doob, Miller, Mowrer and Sears, Frustration and Aggression, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1939. See also W. Runciman, Relative Deprivation and Social Injustice, Penguin, 1972, esp. Chapters 2 and 3: L. Berkowitz, Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences and Control, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.Google Scholar

H. Miall, Oliver Ramsbotham and Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conflict Resolution, Cambridge: Polity, 1999, p. 77.Google Scholar

For a recent review of mediation see Christopher Mitchell, ‘Mediation and the Ending of Conflicts’, in John Darby and Roger MacGinty, Contemporary Peacemaking, London: Palgrave, 2002, pp. 77–86.Google Scholar

On neutrality and partiality see Thomas Princen, Intermediaries in International Conflict, Princeton UP, 1992: On ripe moments and the hurting stalemate, I. William Zartman, The Practical Negotiator, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

I. William Zartman, ‘The Timing of Peace Initiatives,’ in John Darby and Roger MacGinty, op. cit., p. 19.Google Scholar

Andrew Linklater and John Macmillan, Boundaries in Question, London: Pinters, 1995, p. 5.Google Scholar

Norrie MacQueen, United Nations Peacekeeping in Africa Since 1960, London: Longman, 2002, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 12.Google Scholar

Erwin A. Schmidl, Peace Operations Between Peace and War, London: Frank Cass, 2000, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 9.Google Scholar

See Dag Hammarskjold, Summary Study of the Experience Derived From the Establishment and Operation of the Force: Report of the Secretary-General, in Official Records of the General Assembly, Thirteenth Session: Annexes. A/3943, 9 October 1958. New York: United Nations, July 1960, pp. 8–42.Google Scholar

Mike Pugh, ‘Peacekeeping and Critical Theory’, Conference Presentation at BISA, LSE, London, 16–18 December, 2002, p. 5.Google Scholar

See James A. Stegenga, The United Nations Force in Cyprus, Ohio: Ohio State University, 1968.Google Scholar

See Alan James, The Politics of Peacekeeping, London: Chatto & Windus for the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1969.Google Scholar

See Johan Galtung and Carl G. Jacobsen, Searching for Peace: The Road to TRANSCEND, London: Pluto Press, 2000.Google Scholar

See for example, John Burton, World Society, Cambridge: CUP, 1972.Google Scholar

E.A. Azar, ‘Protracted International Conflicts: Ten Propositions’, in J. Burton and E.A. Azar, op. cit., p. 29.Google Scholar

H. Miall (ed.), The Peacemakers, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992, pp. 234–237.Google Scholar

E.A. Azar, ‘Protracted International Conflicts: Ten Propositions’, in J. Burton and E.A. Azar, International Conflict Resolution, op. cit., p. 29.Google Scholar

Edward E. Azar, The Management ofProtracted Social Conflict, Hampshire, UK: Dartmouth Publishing, 1990, pp. 9–12 and p. 155.Google Scholar

John Burton, Conflict and Communication, London: Macmillan, 1969, p. 161.Google Scholar

See Hugh Miall, ‘What do peace studies contribute distinctively to the study of peace?’, Presentation at the 18th International Peace Research Association Conference, Tampere, Finland, August 2000.Google Scholar

John Burton, ‘The History of Conflict Resolution’, in John Burton and E.A. Azar, International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books, 1986, p. 45.Google Scholar

For more on this see Deinol Jones, Cosmopolitan Mediation? Conflict Resolution and the Oslo Accords, Manchester University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

For a good overview, see Dennis J.D. Sandole, ‘John Burton’s Contribution To Conflict Resolution Theory And Practice: A Personal View’, International Journal ofPeace Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2001.Google Scholar

Christopher Mitchell and Michael Banks, Handbook of Conflict Resolution, London: Pinter, 1996, p. x.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. x.Google Scholar

For more on this see, Oliver P. Richmond, ‘Rethinking Conflict Resolution: The Linkage Problematic between ’Track I’ and “Track II”, Journal of Conflict Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2001.Google Scholar

Elizabeth Cousens, ‘Introduction’ in Elizabeth Cousens and C. Kumar, Peacebuilding as Politics, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

R. Vayrynen, New Directions in Conflict Theory: Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation, London: Sage, 1991, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar

John Paul Lederach, Building Peace, Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace, 1997, p. 39. See also, J. Lederach, Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Boutros Boutros Ghali, An Agenda for Peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping, A/47/277—S/24111, 17 June 1992.Google Scholar

Kofi Annan, cited by Philip Wilkinson, ‘Shaperning the Weapons of Peace: Peace Support Operations and Complex Emergencies’, in Tom Woodhouse and Oliver Ramsbotham, Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution, London: Frank Cass, 2000, p. 63.Google Scholar

Michael S. Lund, ‘What Kind of Peace is Being Built: Taking Stock of Post-Conflict Peacebuilding and Charting Future Directions’, Paper presented on the 10th Anniversary of Agenda for Peace, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, January 2003, p. 18. Lund makes the interesting point that this resembles the US Peace Corp of the 1960s.Google Scholar

Michael S. Lund, Preventing Violent Conflicts, Washington: USIP, 1996, p. 87.Google Scholar

Jarat Chopra, ‘The Space of Peace Maintenance’, Political Geography, Vol. 15 No. 3/4, 1996, p. 338.Google Scholar

For more on this development, see Charles T. Call and Susan E. Cook, ‘On Democratisation and Peacebuilding’, Global Governance, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003, pp. 233–246.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 235.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 238.Google Scholar

K. Van der Pijl, Transnational Classes and International Relations, London: Routledge, 1998, p. 131.Google Scholar

R.W. Cox, ‘Critical Political Economy’, in B. Hettne (ed.), International Political Economy, London: Zed, 1995, p. 41.Google Scholar

For more on this see Chandra Sriram, ‘Revolutions in Accountability’ American University International Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2003: Charles O. Lerche, ‘Truth Commissions and National Reconciliation: Some Reflections on Theory and Practice.’ in Peace and Conflict Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2000.Google Scholar

UN Charter, Chapter VI, Article 36, para. 3.Google Scholar

See Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighbourhood, Oxford: OUP, 1995, p. 6.Google Scholar

Fernand de Varennes, ‘Peace Accords and Ethnic Conflict’, in John Darby and Roger MacGinty, op. cit., p. 152.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 153.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 156.Google Scholar

Ian Clark, The Post-Cold War Order: The Spoils of Peace, OUP, 2001, p. 175.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 175.Google Scholar

David Rieff, A Bed for the Night, London: Vintage, 2002, p. 10.Google Scholar

Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, Oxford: OUP, 1998 [1651], p. 186.Google Scholar

Robert Cox, ‘Postscript 1985’, in Robert Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics, Columbia UP, 1986, p. 242.Google Scholar

See Kenneth Boulding, Stable Peace, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1978; E. Luard, War in International Society, London: I.B. Tauris Ltd., 1986; K.J. Holsti, Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991; Hidemi Suganami, On the causes of war, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Michel Foucault, ‘Truth and Power’ in P. Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader, London: Penguin, 1989, p. 65.Google Scholar

Vivienne Jabri, Discourses on Violence, MUP, 1996, pp. 145–67.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 149.Google Scholar

Anthony Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity, Cambridge: Polity, 1991, p. 211.Google Scholar

See Johan Galtung, ‘A Structural Theory of Imperialism’ Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 8, 1971, pp. 81–117: David Barash (ed.), Approaches to Peace, Oxford: OUP, 2000.Google Scholar

Michael S. Lund, ‘What Kind of Peace is Being Built: Taking Stock of Post-Conflict Peacebuilding and Charting Future Directions’, op. cit., p. 20.Google Scholar

Ibid., p. 21.Google Scholar