beckett and performance

  • S. E. Gontarski
Part of the Palgrave Advances book series (PAD)

Abstract

The idea of performance preoccupied Samuel Beckett well before he began to explore its potential directly in the theater. Its roots are in the doubling of the self that is already implicit in the idea of representation and the quasi-Cartesian idea of the ‘pseudocouple’ that Beckett would hone into in his fiction and drama alike. A character named ‘Mr. Beckett,’ for instance, appears in Dream of Fair to Middling Women (written between 1931–2) as a belaurelled poet at the conclusion of the short chapter called ‘Und’: ‘Oh but the bay, Mr Beckett, didn’t you know, about your brow’ (141). (In 1931 laurels for the young author were, of course, very much a fiction.) At that point the author no longer stood entirely outside his work, but inside and outside simultaneously, a part of and apart from the narrative. Such fictionalizing of the self, narrated and narrator overlapping, followed hard upon Beckett’s one and only direct stage appearance; he was persuaded to appear as Don Diègue in three performances of Trinity College’s ‘Cornelian nightmare,’ Le Kid, at Dublin’s Peacock Theatre between 19–21 February 1931 (Knowlson 126). Later in the 1930s Beckett would write a 23-line poem in French, ‘Arènes de Lutèce,’ in which he explored more fully the fractured or doubled self, what Lawrence Harvey referred to as the experience of dédoublement (202–07).

Keywords

Trinity College Theater Artist Book Form Private Copy Philosophical Dialogue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

works cited

  1. Atik, Anne. How it Was: a Memoir of Samuel Beckett. London: Faber and Faber, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Beckett, Samuel. Endgame. New York: Grove Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, Samuel. Three Novels. New York: Grove Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, Samuel. Mercier and Camier. New York: Grove Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Beckett, Samuel. The Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett. New York: Grove Press, 1984; London: Faber and Faber, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Beckett, Samuel. The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber and Faber, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. Beckett, Samuel. Dream of Fair to Middling Women. Dublin: Black Cat Books, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. Cohn, Ruby. A Beckett Canon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Duckworth, Colin. ‘Beckett’s New Godot.’ Beckett’s Later Fiction and Drama, ed. James Acheson and Kateryna Arthur. London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1987, 175–92.Google Scholar
  10. Harmon, Maurice. No Author Better Served: the Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Alan Schneider. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, Lawrence. Samuel Beckett, Poet and Critic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Pilling, John (ed.). Beckett’s ‘Dream’ Notebook. Reading, England: Beckett International Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Reid, Alec. ‘Impact and Parable in Beckett: a First Encounter with Not I.’ Hermathena: a Trinity College Review, ed. Terence Brown and Nicholas Grene. CXLI (Winter 1986): 12–21.Google Scholar
  14. Worton, Michael. ‘Waiting for Godot and Endgame: Theater as Text.’ The Cambridge Companion to Beckett, ed. John Pilling. London: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Gontarski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations