On Policies and Prospects for British Sign Language

  • Graham H. Turner
Chapter

Abstract

This study is not primarily driven by language data per se, but rather draws upon more impressionistic participation and observation within the minority language community in question. The author is a user of British Sign Language (BSL), engaged socially and professionally on a daily basis with the relevant language community. The issue under investigation relates to the interpenetration of language and social systems, and a close awareness of social and public policy forces and their consequences are applied. The work presented here is aligned with an emerging tradition of scholarship in sign linguistics and builds upon the author’s earlier work (Turner 1995, 1996, 1999), drawing on the sociology of language and on anthropological linguistics for analyses of language and identity and on some recent developments in socio-political theory.

Keywords

Policy Climate Language Policy Sign Language Cochlear Implant Minority Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, R., 1997, ‘Response to Foundation Paper 3 — A Disability Rights Perspective’, Deaf Worlds, 13(2): 16–21.Google Scholar
  2. Brennan, M., 1992, ‘The Visual World of BSL: An Introduction’, in Dictionary of British Sign Language/English, ed. D. Brien. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, M. and Brown, R. K., 1997, Equality before the law? Deaf people’s access to justice. Durham: University of Durham.Google Scholar
  4. Brien, D., Brown, R. and Collins, J., 2002, The Organisation and Provision of BSL/English Interpreters in England, Scotland and Wales. Dept of Work and Pensions: In-house report 102. http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/IH102.pdfGoogle Scholar
  5. Corker, M., 1998, Deaf and Disabled, or Deafness Disabled? Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coupland, N., Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. N. (eds), 2001, Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, L. J., 1995, Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, deafness and the body. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Faulks, K., 2000, Citizenship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Fishman, J., 1991, Reversing Language Shift. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  10. Harrington, F. J. and Turner, G. H., 2001, Interpreting Interpreting: Studies and Reflections on Sign Language Interpreting. Coleford, Gloucestershire: Douglas McLean.Google Scholar
  11. Heller, M., 1999, Linguistic Minorities and Modernity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  12. Kannapell, B., 1993, Language Choice — Identity Choice. Burtonsville, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
  13. Krausneker, V., 2000, ‘Sign Languages and the Minority Language Policy of the European Union’, Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, 6: 142–58.Google Scholar
  14. Kyle, J. and Woll, B., 1985, Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and their Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kymlicka, W., 1995, Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lane, H., 1992, The Mask of Benevolence: Disabling the Deaf Community. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  17. Le Page, R. and Tabouret-Keller, A., 1985, Acts of Identity; Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lucas, C. and Valli, C., 1992, Language contact in the American Deaf community. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mather, S., 1996, Seeing Language in Sign: The Work of William C. Stokoe. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Padden, C. A., 1996, ‘From the Cultural to the Bicultural: The Modern Deaf Community’, in Cultural and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience, ed. I. Parasnis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Padden, C. A. and Humphries, T., 1988, Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Padden, C. A. and Rayman, J., 2002, ‘The Future of ASL’, in The Study of Signed Languages: Essays in Honour of William Stokoe (eds) D. Armstrong, M. Karchmer, J. Vickrey Van Cleve. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet University Press, 303–27.Google Scholar
  23. Schermer, T., 1992, In Search of a Language. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  24. Sutton-Spence, R. and Woll, B., 1999, The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner, G. H., 1994, ‘How is Deaf culture?’ Sign Language Studies, 83: 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Turner, G. H., 1995, ‘Contact Signing and Language Shift’, in Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research in Munich (eds) H. Bos and T. Schermer. Hamburg: Signum Press, 211–29.Google Scholar
  27. Turner, G. H., 1996, ‘Language Change at the British Sign Language/English interface’, in Change and Language (eds) H. Coleman and L. Cameron. Clevedon, Avon: British Association for Applied Linguistics/Multilingual Matters, 64–72.Google Scholar
  28. Turner, G. H., 1999, ‘“Ungraceful, repulsive, difficult to comprehend”: Sociolinguistic consideration of shifts in signed languages’, Issues in Applied Linguistics, 10: 131–52.Google Scholar
  29. Young, I., 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham H. Turner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations