Advertisement

Civic Integration and Social Cohesion

  • David Lockwood

Abstract

This essay attempts to clarify what might be meant by the term’ social cohesion’ — and its putative decline — in the context of recent changes in capitalist production relations, and with special reference to the UK during the period 1979—95.

Keywords

Social Cohesion Money Laundering Labour Force Survey Black Economy State Pension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bosworth-Davies, R. and Saltmarsh, G. 1994. Money Laundering. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  2. della Porta, D. and Vannucci A. 1994. ‘Politics, the Mafia and the Market for Corrupt Exchange’ in Carol Mershan and Gianfranco Pasquino (eds) Italian Politics: Ending the First Republic. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Downes, D. 1997. ‘What the Next Government Should Do About Crime’, The Howard Journal, vol. 36, no. 1 (February).Google Scholar
  4. Durkheim, E. 1952. Suicide, ed. George Simpson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Ann Elliott, K. 1997. (ed.) Corruption and the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission 1996. Fight Against Fraud, 1995 Report. European Commission: Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  7. Field, S. and Southgale, P. 1982. Public Disorder. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. Finch, J. 1989. ‘Kinship and Friendship’ in Roger Jowell, Sharon Witherspoon and Lindsay Brook (eds) British Social Attitudes: Special International Report. Aldershot: Gower. 87–104.Google Scholar
  9. Gallie, D. 1994. ‘Are the Unemployed an Underclass?’, Sociology, vol. 28, no. 3.Google Scholar
  10. Geissler, R. 1996. Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlands. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbs, P.A. 1996. Rioting in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, P. 1997. ‘Social Capital: a Fragile Asset’ in Demos Collection, no. 12.Google Scholar
  13. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. 1996. Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Home Office, 1996. The 1996 British Crime Survey: England and Wales, London: Home Office Statistical Bulletin, Issue 19 /96. 24 September.Google Scholar
  15. James, O. 1995. Juvenile Violence in a Winner-Loser Culture: Socio-economic and Familial Origins of the Rise in Violence against the Person. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  16. Kaase, M. and Newton, K. 1995. Beliefs in Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kapstein, E.B. 1994. Governing the Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Citizens and the State, 1995. eds Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Krugman, P. 1995. The Age of Diminished Expectations: U.S. Economic Policy in the 1990s. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lane, J.-E., McKay, D. and Newton, K. 1997, Political Data Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lea, J. and Young, J. 1993. What Is to Be Done About Law and Order? London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lockwood, D. ‘Civic Integration and Class Formation’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 47, no. 3.Google Scholar
  23. Luttwak, E. 1996. ‘Central Bankism’, London Review of Books, vol. 18 (14 November).Google Scholar
  24. Marshall, G., Roberts, S. and Burgoyne, C. 1996. ‘Social Class and Underclass in Britain and the USA’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 47, no. 1.Google Scholar
  25. Mayhew, P. and White, P. 1997. The International Crime Victimisation Study, Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate. Research Findings No. 57. London.Google Scholar
  26. Mouzelis, N. 1991. Back to Sociological Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moyser, G. and Parry, G. 1997. ‘Voluntary Associations and Democratic Participation in Britain’ in Jan W. van Deth (ed.) Private Groups and Public Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Power, A. and Tunstall, R. 1997. Dangerous Disorder: Riots and Violent Disturbances in Thirteen Areas of Britain. York: York Publishing Services.Google Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. with Leonardi, R. and Manetti, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Reuvid, J. (ed.), 1995. The Regulation and Prevention of Economic Crime Internationally. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  31. Robinson, P. 1997. Labour Market Studies: United Kingdom. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  32. Rose-Ackerman, S. 1997. Development, World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Topf, R., Mohler, P. and Heath, A. 1989. ‘Pride in One’s Country’ in Roger Jowell, Sharon Witherspoon and Lindsay Brook (eds) British Social Attitudes: Special International Report. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  34. van Deth, J.W. 1997. (ed.), Private Groups and Public Life: Social Participation, Voluntary Associations and Political Involvement in Representative Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Verba, S., Lehman Scholzman, K. and Brady, H.E. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Waddington, D. 1992. Contemporary Issues in Public Disorder: a Comparative and Historical Approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weinberg, L. 1997. ‘Conclusion’ in Peter H. Merkl and Leonard Weinberg, The Revival of Right-Wing Extremism in the Nineties. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, R. 1960. American Society: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Lockwood 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Lockwood
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EssexUK

Personalised recommendations