Contemporary Management of Innovation pp 147-166 | Cite as
Strategic Reflexivity as a Framework for Understanding Development in Modern Firms. How the Environment Drives Innovation
Abstract
In this chapter, we argue that ‘strategic reflexivity’ can be seen as one way to conceptualize the development of modern firms. Modern firms and other organizations are often under pressure to develop or innovate in order to survive, but they depend on future markets and environments of which they do not have objective knowledge. Therefore they have to make use of uncertain development strategies within a framework of what we here call ‘strategic reflexivity’. Strategic reflexivity is based on reflexive interpretations about developments in the environment (or the market) of the firm. For instance, what is normally conceived as market driven innovation (Nyström, 1990; Tidd, Bessant & Pavitt, 1997) must, within the framework of strategic reflexivity, be understood as a process in which the firm does not react directly on the basis of ‘objective’ market changes, but creates an interpretation of the future environment that guides their development process. This approach to strategy can also be found in Mintzberg (1998) as well as Daft and Weick’s (1984) view of the firm as an interpretation system; thus it is not new. What is new in this chapter is the combination of this approach with Weick’s (1995) sense-making approach and the resource-based view of the firm (e.g., Grant, 1991) in an attempt to explain innovation. This theoretical combination is particularly useful as it leads us to a broader interpretation of the concept of innovation and a new model of the innovative organization, which specifies the firm as a system of roles.
Keywords
External Condition Radical Development Middle Manager Objective Knowledge Social EntrepreneurPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
- Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society ( London: Sage).Google Scholar
- Boden, M. & Miles, I. (eds) (2000), Services and the Knowledge-based Economy ( London: Continuum ).Google Scholar
- Daft, R.L. & Weick, K.E. (1984), ‘Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpetration Systems’, Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), pp. 284–95.Google Scholar
- Drucker, P. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship ( New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
- Freeman, C. & Soete, L. (1997), The Economics of Industrial Innovation ( London: Pinter).Google Scholar
- Fuglsang, L. (2001), ‘Management Problems in Welfare Services: The Role of the ‘Social Entrepreneur’ in Home-help for the Elderly, the Valby Case’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17 (4), pp. 437–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gallouj, F. (2002), Innovation in the Service Economy ( Cheltenham: Elgar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society ( Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life ( New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
- Grant, R. (1991), ‘The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation’, California Management Review, spring, pp. 114–35.Google Scholar
- Grant, R. (2002), Contemporary Strategic Analyses ( Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
- Grönroos, C. (2000), Service Management and Marketing ( Chichester: Wiley).Google Scholar
- Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C.K. (1994), Competing for the Future ( Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
- Hauknes, J. (1998), Services in Innovation - Innovation in Services (SI4S final report, Oslo: STEP Group).Google Scholar
- Howells, J. (2004), ‘Innovation, Consumption and Services’, Service Industries Journal, 24 (1), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kanter, R.M. (1983), The Change Masters ( London: Unwin).Google Scholar
- Knorr-Celina, K., Aaron, V. & Cicourel, A. (eds) (1981), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-sociologies ( London: Routledge ).Google Scholar
- Lawrence, P.R. & Lorsch, J.W. (1967), Organization and Environment ( Boston: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
- Linton, R. (1936), The Study of Man ( New York: Appelton Century-Crofts).Google Scholar
- Mead, G.H. (1934), Mind, Self and Society ( Chicago: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
- Mintzberg, H. (1994), The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning ( New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
- Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1998), Strategy Safari ( New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
- Nyström, H. (1990), Technological and Market Innovation ( Chichester: Wiley).Google Scholar
- Owen, G. (1995), Game Theory ( San Diego: Academic Press).Google Scholar
- Penrose, E.T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm ( New York: Blackwell).Google Scholar
- Pine, B.J. & Gilmore, J.H. (1999), The Experience Economy ( Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
- Porter, M. (1985), Competitive Advantage ( New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
- Porter, M. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations ( New York: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schendel, D. & Channon, D. (eds) (1990), ‘Special Issue on Corporate Entrepreneurship’, Strategic Management Journal, 11, summer.Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. ( 1911 [1934]), The Theory of Economic Development ( Boston: Harvard University).Google Scholar
- Shavina, L. (ed.) (2003), The International Handbook on Innovation ( New York: Pergamon ).Google Scholar
- SIC (Service Development, Internationalization and Competence Development) (1999), Danish Service Firms’ Innovation Activities and use of ICT, Report no. 2 from the project.Google Scholar
- SIC (Service Development, Internationalisation & Competence Development), (Roskilde: Centre for Service Studies, Roskilde University) (http://www.ruc.dk/css/sic/published.html).
- Sundbo, J. (1998), The Organisation of Innovation in Services ( Copenhagen: Roskilde University Press).Google Scholar
- Sundbo, J. (2001), The Strategic Management of Innovation ( Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
- Sundbo, J. (2002), ‘Innovation as a strategic process’ (in Sundbo & Fuglsang).Google Scholar
- Sundbo, J. (2003), ‘Innovation and Strategic Reflexivity’ (in Shavina).Google Scholar
- Sundbo, J. & Fuglsang, L. (eds) (2002), Innovation as Strategic Reflexivity ( London: Routledge ).Google Scholar
- Sundbo, J. & Fuglsang, L. (2004), The Organizational Representation of Innovation: Three Modes (Roskilde, manuscript).Google Scholar
- Teece, D.J. & Pisano, G. (1994), ‘The Dynamic Capability of Firms: An Introduction’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (3), pp. 537–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tidd, J., Bessant, J. & Pavitt, K. (1997), Managing Innovation ( Chichester: Wiley).Google Scholar
- Weick, K. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
- Weick, K. (1998), ‘Introductory Essay — Improvization as Mindset for Organizational Analysis’, Organization Science, 9 (5), pp. 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar