Regional Integration Support by the EU in Asia: Aims and Prospects

  • Anja Jetschke


This chapter examines the aims and scope of the EU’s regional integration support (RIS) and the achievements it has had in Southeast Asia. ASEAN invited the EU to support its aim to achieve ASEAN economic integration in September 2003. In parallel to this programme, ASEAN has undergone considerable transformation. It has revamped its institutional structure and transformed in ways that invite comparisons to the EU. Naturally, the fact that the EU has a policy of RIS, and that ASEAN member states express their commitment to create an economic community along the lines of the European Economic Community (EEC) raises the question as to whether the EU acts as a ‘driver’ of regional integration in Southeast Asia. This chapter argues that not the EU rather than economic competition from China is the real driver behind changes along the lines of the EU.


Regional Integration Economic Integration European Economic Community Policy Dialogue ASEAN Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acharya, A. (2001) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, Routledge, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. — (2004) ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, International Organization, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alter, K. J. (2012) ‘The Global Spread of European Style International Courts’, West European Politics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASEAN (2008) ASEAN Charter, ASEAN Secretariat.Google Scholar
  5. ASEAN pursues EU-style regional integration (2007) International Harold Tribune,12 January.Google Scholar
  6. ASEAN Secretariat (2001) The ASEAN Way and the Rule of Law, Address by Rodolfo C. Severino, Secretary-General of ASEAN, at the International Law Conference on ASEAN Legal Systems and Regional Integration, Kuala Lumpur, 3 September 2001, viewed 6 July 2012.
  7. Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2005) Rules for the World: International Organization in Global Politics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
  8. Beeson, M. (2001) Reconfiguring East Asia: Regional Institutions and Organizations after the Crisis, Curzon, Richmond.Google Scholar
  9. Bilal, S. (2005) ‘Can the EU Be a Model of Regional Integration? Risks and Challenges for Developing Countries’, paper presented to International Conference on Globalisation: Overcoming exclusion, strengthening inclusion, Dakar, Senegal, FD6C95057DC125719D004B65F6/$FILE/Bilal — Can EU be a model of RI Draft for comments.pdf%3E.
  10. Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2009) Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism, KFG The Transformative Power of Europe, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. — (2012) ‘From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction’, West European Politics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camroux, D. and Lechervy, C. (1996) ‘“Close Encounter of a Third Kind?” The Inaugural Asia-Europe Meeting of March 1996’, The Pacific Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chin, K.W. (2010) Personal Interview by Anja Jetschke with Dr Chin Kin Wah, Deputy Director of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), 8 September.Google Scholar
  14. Commission, E. (2003) Communication from the Commission: A New Partnership with South East Asia. COM (2003) 399/4, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. Commission of the European Communities (1995a) European Community Support for Regional Economic Integration Efforts among Developing Countries: Communicatin from the Commission. COM(95) 219 final, European Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
  16. — (1995b) Free Trade Areas: An Appraisal. Communication from the Commission. Sec(95) 322 final, European Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
  17. — (2002) Trade and Development: Assisting Developing Countries to Benefit from Trade. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM (2002) 513 final, European Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
  18. DMI Associates (2012) ASEAN-EU Programme for Regional Integration Support (APRIS) — TECHNICAL Training Programme,
  19. Doidge, M. (2011) The European Union and Interregionalism: Patterns of Engagement, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, Surrey.Google Scholar
  20. EU Commission (1994) Towards a New Asia Strategy: Communication from the Commission to the Council. COM (94) 314 final, 13 July 1994 — Archive of European Integration, EU Commission, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  21. — (2009) Evaluation of EC Co-Operation with ASEAN: Final Report, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  22. EuropeAid (2012) Supporting Regional Integration, viewed 26 May 2012.
  23. European Parliament, European Council & European Commission (2006) ‘Joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the member states meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union development policy: “The European Consensus”. 2006/C 46/01’, Official Journal of the European Union, vol. C 46, no. 1, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  24. Europäischer Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschuss (2011) ‘Stellungnahme des Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses zum Thema “Die Beziehungen EU/ASEAN” (2011/C 21/04). Berichterstatter: Claudio CAPPELLINI’, Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union, vol. C, no. 21, pp. 21–25.Google Scholar
  25. Fawcett, L. L. E. and Hurrell, A. (1995) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Goh De No (2012) ‘Yudhoyono: Asean Should Take Cue from EU on Integration The Brunei Times’, viewed 29 June 2012,
  27. Hurrell, A. (1995) ‘Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics’, Review of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Interview 05–2010 (2010) Personal Interview by Anja Jetschke with former ASEAN Secretary General, 10 September.Google Scholar
  29. Interview 18–2010 (2010) Personal Interview by Anja Jetschke with high-ranking ASEAN official, 30 September.Google Scholar
  30. Jetschke, A. (2009) ‘Institutionalizing ASEAN: Celebrating Europe through Network Governance’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. — (2010) Do Regional Organizations Travel? European Integration, Diffusion and Regional Organization in Asia, KFG Working Paper Series, KFG, Berlin.Google Scholar
  32. Jetschke, A. and Murray, P. (2012) ‘Diffusing Regional Integration: The EU and Southeast Asia’, West European Politics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katsumata, H. (2010) ‘Mimetic Adoption and Norm Diffusion: “Western” Security Cooperation in Southeast Asia?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 557–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khong, Y. F. and Nesadurai, H. (2007) ‘Hanging Together, Institutional Design and Cooperation in Southeast Asia: AFTA and the ARF’, in A. Acharya and A. I. Johnston (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 32–82.Google Scholar
  35. Koremenos, B., Lipson, C. and Snidal, D. (2001) ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’, International Organization, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lim, H.-C. and Hwang, S.-M. (2011) ‘The Rise of Asia in a Global Context: Implications for Regional Community Building’, paper presented to 2011 International Conference Global Challenges in Asia: New Development Model and Regional Community Building, 20–21 October 2011, Seoul, South Korea,
  37. Lombaerde, P. and Puri, L. (2009) Aid for Trade: Global and Regional perspectives: 2007 World Report on Regional Integration, Springer,
  38. Lombaerde, P. and Schulz, M. (2009) ‘Introduction’, in P. Lombaerde and M. Schulz (eds.), The EU and World Regionalism: The Makability of Regions in the 21st Century, Ashgate Publishers, Aldershot, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  39. — (2012) ‘Introduction’, in P. Lombaerde and M. Schulz (eds.), The EU and World Regionalism: The Makability of Regions in the 21st Century, Ashgate Publishers, Aldershot, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  40. Martin, L. L. (1993) ‘Credibility, Costs, and Institutions’, World Politics, vol.45, no. 3, pp. 406–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mercereau, B. (2005) ‘FDI Flows to Asia: Did the Dragon Crowd Out the Tigers?’, IMF Working Paper Series, no. 05/189,…/wp051891.pdf%3E.
  42. Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, pp. 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pietrangeli, G. (2012) ‘Supporting Regional Integration and Cooperation Worldwide: An Overview of the European Union approach’, in P. S. De Lombaerde (ed.), The EU and World Regionalism: The Makability of Regions in the 21st Century, Ashgate Publishers, Aldershot, pp. 9–44.Google Scholar
  44. Robina, Z. E. (2011) ‘Neues Selbstbewusstsein der ASEAN-Staaten’, viewed 10 February 2012,,,6613149,00.html%3E.
  45. Rogers, E. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edn, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Rüland, J. (2000) ‘ASEAN and the Asian Crisis: Theoretical Implications and Practical Consequences for Southeast Asian Regionalism’, The Pacific Review, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwarz, A. and Villinger, R. (2004) ‘Integrating Southeast Asian Economies’, The McKinsey Quarterly, no. 1, pp. 37–47,
  48. Simmons, B. and Elkins, Z. (2004) ‘The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy’, International Organization, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 171–189.Google Scholar
  49. Söderbaum, F. and Van Langenhove, L. (2005) ‘Introduction: The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism’, Journal of European Integration, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strang, D. and Meyer, J. D. (1993) ‘Institutional Conditions for Diffusion’, Theory and Society, vol. 22, pp. 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tay, S. S., Estanislao, J. P. and Soesastro, H. (eds.) (2001) Reinventing ASEAN, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.Google Scholar
  52. Termsak, C. (2009) ‘Institutional Reform: One Charter, Three Communities, Many Challenges’, in D. Emmerson (ed.), Hard Choices: Security, Democracy, and Regionalism in Southeast Asia, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp. 91–131.Google Scholar
  53. Tong, S. Y., Chong, C. and Keng, S. (2010) ‘China-ASEAN Free Trade Area in 2010: A Regional Perspective’, EAI Background Brief No. 519,
  54. Wong, R. (forthcoming) ‘Model Power or Reference Point?: The EU and the ASEAN Charter’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  55. Yeo, L. H. (2008) ‘EU-ASEAN Relations and Policy-Learning’, in R. Balme and B. Bridges (eds.), Europe-Asia Relations, Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anja Jetschke 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja Jetschke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations