The State of Political Theory and the Problem of Ideology
Chapter
Abstract
The nature and relationship of philosophy, science and ideology as modes of political thought is the subject of a number of important debates in the latter half of the twentieth century. For most of the history of political thought little or no distinction is made between political philosophy and political science, and the term political ideology does not exist (although what is now termed ideology may have existed). For at least 2500 years, from the ancient Greeks to the great thinkers of the nineteenth century, such as Marx and Mill, there has been a recognisable and recognised tradition of political philosophy. Certainly the discipline has undergone great changes in this time, but there remains a tradition of normative political thought, concerned with the standards and goals of political life, and with the justification and criticism of political behaviour and institutions. In the second half of the twentieth century, however, political philosophy has experienced dramatic changes of fortune amid great debates on the nature and status of the discipline.
Keywords
Political Science Political Philosophy Political Theory Political Ideology Linguistic Analysis
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.P. Laslett (ed.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, First Series (Oxford, Blackwell, 1956), p. vii.Google Scholar
- 7.A.J. Ayer, Language, Truth and Logic, second edition (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1971), p. 41.Google Scholar
- 9.A.J. Ayer, ‘The Vienna Circle’, in A.J. Ayer et al., The Revolution in Philosophy (London, Macmillan, 1956), p. 79.Google Scholar
- 10.A. Quinton (ed.), Political Philosophy (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1967), p. 1.Google Scholar
- 13.T.D. Weldon, The Vocabulary of Politics (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1953), p. 192.Google Scholar
- 23.B. Magee (ed.), Men of Ideas (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1982), p. 107.Google Scholar
- 25.E. Gellner, Words and Things (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1968), p. 249.Google Scholar
- 26.E. Kirkpatrick, ‘From Past to Present’, in D. Freeman (ed.), Foundation of Political Science (New York, The Free Press, 1977), p. 24.Google Scholar
- 27.R. Dahl, ‘The Behavioural Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest’, American Political Science Review, 1961, vol. 55, no. 4.Google Scholar
- 28.D. Kavanagh, Political Science and Political Behaviour (London, George Allen and Unwin, 1983), pp. 2–5.Google Scholar
- 30.See D. Easton, ‘The Current Meaning of Behaviouralism’, in J.C. Charlesworth (ed.), Contemporary Political Analysis (New York, Free Press, 1967), pp. 16–17, and Kirkpatrick,‘ From Past to Present’, pp. 22–3, for alternative but similar characterisations.Google Scholar
- 33.For an account of what he terms the ‘belated impact of Marxism’ on the study of British politics, see R. Berki, ‘The Belated Impact of Marxism’, in J. Hayward and P. Norton (eds), The Political Science of British Politics (Brighton, Wheatsheaf, 1986).Google Scholar
- 34.E. Shils, ‘End of Ideology’, in C. Waxman (ed.), The End of Ideology Debate (New York, Simon and Schuster, 1968). Google Scholar
- 35.D. Bell, The End of Ideology, revised edition(New York, The Free Press, 1961);Google Scholar
- 35.S.M. Upset, Political Man (London, Heinemann, 1960). Google Scholar
- 47.B. Goodwin, Using Political Ideas, third edition (Chichester, John Wiley, 1992), p. 26.Google Scholar
- 51.A. Maclntyre, Against the Self-Images of the Age (London, Duckworth, 1971), p. 5.Google Scholar
- 55.F. Fukuyama, ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest, 1989, no. 16, p. 4. Fukuyama elaborates his thesis in The End of History and the Last Man(London, Hamish Hamilton, 1992).Google Scholar
- 60.P. Laslett and W.G. Runciman (eds), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Second Series (Oxford, Blackwell, 1962), Introduction. Google Scholar
- 61.P. Laslett and W.G. Runciman (eds), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series (Oxford, Blackwell, 1967), p. 3.Google Scholar
- 63.J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
- 64.J. Maritain, Man and the State (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1951).Google Scholar
- 64.L. Strauss, Natural Right and History (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1953).Google Scholar
- 64.E. Voegelin, Order and History (Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, from 1956).Google Scholar
- 64.B. Jouvenel, Sovereignty, trans. J. Huntingdon (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
- 64.H. Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1959).Google Scholar
- 64.F. Hayek, The Constitution. of Liberty (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960).Google Scholar
- 64.M. Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics (London, Methuen, 1962).Google Scholar
- 64.H. Marcuse, One Dimensional Man (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964).Google Scholar
- 64.C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
- 65.J. Rawls, ‘Justice as Fairness’, The Philosophical Review, 1958, vol. 57. Google Scholar
- 66.R. Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford, Blackwell, 1974).Google Scholar
- 66.R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (London, Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar
- 66.B. Ackerman, Social Justice in the Liberal State (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
- 66.and M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice (Oxford, Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar
- 67.A. Ryan, ‘The Ideologist of American Liberalism’, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 8 October 1982, p. 18. Google Scholar
- 68.B. Parekh, Contemporary Political Thinkers (Oxford, Martin Robinson, 1982), p. 174.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© David Morrice 1996