Edmund Spenser pp 160-187 | Cite as

Mutability and the Literary Life

  • Gary Waller
Part of the Macmillan Literary Lives book series (LL)

Abstract

The Faerie Queene — along with the mysterious Cantos of Mutability, which were published twelve years after Spenser’s death — is often seen as the most significant poetic document of its age. This assessment has been based on the poem’s celebration of the apparent glories of the ‘golden’ Elizabethan age. But as we have surveyed Spenser’s career, it can be seen that The Faerie Queene’s significance may lie rather in its depiction of the crumbling of an archaic world and the opening up of what, for want of a better word, we can term the modern. It is especially crucial to our understanding of the transition in English cultural life, and not only in poetry, between the death of Sidney in 1586 and the outbreak of the Civil War over fifty years later. In part deliberately (and as it grew, increasingly) nostalgic, retrogressive, and disillusioned, The Faerie Queene opens for our view the emerging forces which were eventually to shatter the world it celebrates and from which it traced its origins and inspiration. Spenser criticism has rarely confronted this contradiction, preferring to explain away the frustrations, dislocations, and disruptions by searching — probably as desperately as Spenser himself might have — for principles of unity, harmony, and authority that somehow lie ‘behind’ the shifting intentions and unpredictabilities of the poem and behind the changing shape of his own life.

Keywords

Christian Theology English Court Gender Assignment Literary Life Love Poetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jonathan Crewe, Hidden Designs: the Critical Profession and Renaissance Literature (New York, 1986), p. 55; Rambuss, p. 84.Google Scholar
  2. 10.
    Arthur F. Marotti, ‘“Love is not Love”: Elizabethan Sonnet Sequences and the Social Order’, ELH, 49 (1982), 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 11.
    Reed Way Dasenbrook, Imitating the Italians: Wyatt, Spenser, Synge, Pound, Joyce (Baltimore, 1991), p. 83.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    Stoller, Observing the Erotic Imagination (New Haven, 1985), pp. 31–2.Google Scholar
  5. 15.
    See e.g., Leonard Forster, The Icy Fire (Cambridge, 1968), Appendix 1; Theweleit, Male Fantasies, I, p. 284.Google Scholar
  6. 16.
    Raquel Zak de Goldstein, ‘The Dark Continent and its Enigmas,’ International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 65 (1984), 187.Google Scholar
  7. 17.
    Freud, ‘Three Essays’, Standard Edition VII, p. 156; Paglia, p. 242; Stoller, Observing the Erotic Imagination (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), pp. 31–2. See alsoGoogle Scholar
  8. Charles W. Socarides, ‘The Demonified Mother: A Study of Voyeurism and Sexual Sadism’, International Review of Psycho-Analysis I (1974), 192–3 andGoogle Scholar
  9. David W. Allen, The Fear of Looking or Scopophilic-Exhibitionist Conflicts (Bristol, 1974), esp. pp. 40–1.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    Rosalind Coward, ‘Sexual Violence and Sexuality’, Feminist Review XI (June, 1982), 17f.; Kaplan, p. 125.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Sir Isaac Newton, Mathematical Principles trans. Florian Cajori (Berkeley, 1934), p. 6;Google Scholar
  12. Hans Meyerhoff, Time in Literature (Berkeley, 1955), pp. 1–2;Google Scholar
  13. Mircea Eliade, Cosmos and History trans. Willard R. Trask (New York, 1959), pp. 74–5; the whole chapter, pp. 51–92, is relevant here; see alsoGoogle Scholar
  14. S. G. F. Brandon, Time and Mankind (1951), p. 23;Google Scholar
  15. Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology, I (1953), p. 215.Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    A. N. Whitehead, Process and Reality (Cambridge, 1929), p. 295.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    For detailed treatment of Bruno’s connections with Spenser, see G. F. Waller, The Strong Necessity of Time (The Hague, 1976), chapter 3.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Marion Campbell, ‘Spenser’s Mutabilitie Cantos and the End of The Faerie Queene’, Southern Review (Adelaide), 15 (1982), 53.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    Richard Neuse, SpN, 14 (1983), 49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gary Waller 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Waller
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HartfordUSA

Personalised recommendations