Combined and Complex Mode of Innovation in Regional Cluster Development: Analysis of the Light-Weight Material Cluster in Raufoss, Norway

  • Arne Isaksen
  • James Karlsen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of combined and complex innovation (CCI). The concept intends to describe complex innovation processes in regional clusters, where different kinds of knowledge are combined in innovation activities. The combination occurs inside firms and in collaboration between firms and knowledge organizations found in and beyond the regional cluster. The conceptualization of the CCI mode builds on main arguments in the regional innovation system (RIS) literature, which underline that complex innovation processes most often include collaboration among many different actors (such as different kinds of firm and research organization) in order to solve technological, organizational, and other challenges. Different kinds of knowledge are used and combined in innovation processes, and collaboration and knowledge flow are stimulated by geographical and other types of proximity (Boschma, 2005). The combination of the different types of knowledge is, thus, a complex process as it includes actors in different firms and organizations, who need to develop cognitive proximity.

Keywords

Innovation Process Innovation Activity External Knowledge Knowledge Flow Regional Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aftenposten (2009), Finner opp kruttet på nytt (Invent the powder once more). Newspaper article 4, March.Google Scholar
  2. Arbnor, I. and Bjerke, B. (1997), Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Asheim, B. (2007), ‘Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems’, Innovation, 20(3): 223–241.Google Scholar
  4. Asheim, B., Coenen, L. and Moodysson, J. (2007), ‘Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: implications for regional innovation policy’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7(2–5), 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asheim, B.T. and Gertler, M. (2005), ‘The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems’, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press Oxford, pp. 291–317.Google Scholar
  6. Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., Moodysson, J. and Sotarauta, M., (2011), ‘Knowledge bases, modes of innovation and regional innovation policy: a theoretical reexamination with illustrations from the Nordic countries’ in H. Bathelt, M.P. Feldman and D.F. Kogler (eds), Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Boschma, R.A. (2005), ‘Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment’, Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boschma, R. and Frenken, K. (2011), ‘Technological relatedness and regional branching’, in H. Bathelt, M.P. Feldman and D.F. Kogler (eds), Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Coenen, L. (2006), ‘Faraway, So Close’, The Changing Geographies of Regional Innovation. Meddelanden från Lunds Universitets Geografiska Institusjon. Lund, Lunds Universitet.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: ‘Origins of the concept’ in H. Braczyk, P. Cooke and M. Heidenreich (eds), Regional Innovation Systems, London, UCL Press, pp. 2–25.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. (1986), Mind. over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. (1992), Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York, St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  14. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. and Verburg, T. (2007), ‘Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth’, Regional Studies, 41(5): 685–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gertler, M.S. (2008), ‘Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context’, in A. Amin and J. Roberts (eds), Community, Economic Creativity and Organization, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge — the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London, Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Ibert, O. (2007), ‘Towards a geography of knowledge creation: the ambivalences between “knowledge as an object” and “knowing in practice”’, Regional Studies, 41(1): 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Isaksen, A. (2009), ‘The innovation dynamics of global competitive regional clusters: the case of the Norwegian centres of expertise’, Regional Studies, 43(9): 1155–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Isaksen, A. and Kalsaas, B.T. (2009), ‘Suppliers and strategies for upgrading in global production networks: the case of a supplier to the global automotive industry in a high-cost location’, European Planning Studies, 17(4): 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jensen, M.B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007), ‘Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation’, Research Policy, 36: 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnstad, T. (2004), ‘Klynge, nettverk og verdiskaping i innlandet’, NIBR-rapport, 2004:08, NIBR Oslo.Google Scholar
  22. Johnstad, T. (2007), ‘Raufoss: from a learning company to a learning region’ in B. Gustavsen, B. Nyhan and R. Ennals (eds), Learning Together for Local Innovation: Promoting Learning Regions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  23. Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds) (2006), How Europe’s Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007), ‘National innovation systems — analytical concept and development tool’, Industry & Innovation, 14(1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundvall, B.-Å. and Johnson, B. (1994), ‘The learning economy’, Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moodysson, J. (2007), ‘Sites and modes of knowledge creation. On the spatial organization of biotechnology innovation’, Meddelanden från Lunds Universitets Geografiska Institution. Avhandlingar CLXXIV. Lund, Lund University, 237 s.Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2007a), Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007, Paris, OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD (2007b), OECD Territorial Reviews Norway, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
  29. Onsager, K., Isaksen, A., Fraas, M. and Johnstad, T. (2007), ‘Technology cities in Norway: innovating in glocal networks’, European Planning Studies, 15: 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, New York, Doubleday.Google Scholar
  31. Sayer, A. (1992), Method in Social Science. A Realist Approach, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M. (2004), ‘Like phoenix from the ashes? The renewal of clusters in old industrial areas’, Urban Studies, 41(5/6): 1175–1195.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Arne Isaksen and James Karlsen 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Isaksen
  • James Karlsen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations