Protestant Dublin, 1660–1760 pp 129-165 | Cite as
Architectures of Authority in the Eighteenth Century
Abstract
In 1708, the Surveyor General of Ireland, Thomas Burgh, was granted a larger salary because of the ‘encrease of Publick Buildings in Our said kingdom’.1 As with the city’s statues, the principal difference between the institutional buildings of Restoration Dublin and those of the early 1700s was quantity. Burgh’s career certainly illustrates the dramatic increase in the capital’s stock of public architecture since the Glorious Revolution: before his death in 1730, he had designed a custom house, a barracks, a linen repository, and a fortress, and he had made alterations to the Castle. His non-state oeuvre includes churches (seen in Chapter 2), a hospital, and the library of Trinity College. Much to Burgh’s chagrin, the prize commission for the new Parliament House fell to the otherwise obscure interloper Edward Lovett Pearce.
Keywords
Eighteenth Century Privy Council Glorious Revolution Exhibition Room Public ArchitecturePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 3.Idem., ‘The viceregal court’, p. 262. See also D.W. Hayton, ‘The beginnings of the “undertaker” system’, in idem and T. Bartlett (eds.) Penal era and golden age: essays in Irish history, 1690–1800 (Belfast, 1979): 32–54.Google Scholar
- 4.A useful synopsis is P. McNally, ‘“The whole people of Ireland”: patriotism, national identity and nationalism in eighteenth-century Ireland’, in S. Brewster (ed.). Ireland in proximity: history, gender, space (London, 1999): 28–41.Google Scholar
- 6.J. Montague, ‘A shopping arcade in eighteenth-century Dublin: John Rocque and the Essex Street “Piazzas”’, IADS, x (2007): 224–5, pp. 234–5.Google Scholar
- 10.P. Walsh, The making of the Protestant ascendancy: the life of William Conolly, 1662–1729 (Woodbridge, 2010), p. 198.Google Scholar
- 16.F. O’Dwyer, ‘Building empires: architecture, politics and the Board of Works, 1760–1860’, IADS, 5 (2002): 109–75, p. 119.Google Scholar
- 17.M. Dunlevy, Dublin barracks (Dublin, 2002), p. 25.Google Scholar
- 19.T. Bartlett, ‘Army and society in eighteenth-century Ireland’, in W.A. Maguire (ed.), Kings in conflict (Belfast, 1990): 173–82, p. 177.Google Scholar
- 34.A.P.W. Malcomson, Nathaniel Clements: government and the governing elite in Ireland, 1725–75 (Dublin, 2005), pp. 202–3. Malcomson’s follow-up volume (Nathaniel Clements: Arbiter of Taste and Amateur of Architecture, Dublin, forthcoming) promises more about Clements’s building activities.Google Scholar
- 35.Falkiner, ‘Phoenix Park’, pp. 485–7; J. Kelly, Sir Edward Newenham, M.P., 1734–1814: defender of the Protestant constitution (Dublin, 2004), p. 116.Google Scholar
- 38.E. McParland, ‘The Old Four Courts at Christ Church’, in C. Costello (ed.), The Four Courts: 200 years (Dublin, 1996): 23–32.Google Scholar
- 39.A good overview is P. McCarthy, ‘A favourite study’: building the King’s Inns (Dublin, 2006), ch. 1.Google Scholar
- 42.J.T. Gilbert, An account of the parliament house (Dublin, 1896), p. 23.Google Scholar
- 45.D.W. Hayton (ed.), The Letters of Marmaduke Coghill, 1722–1738 (Dublin, 2005), pp. 53–4.Google Scholar
- 46.P. McNally, Parties, patriots and politics: parliamentary politics in early Hanoverian Ireland (Dublin, 1997), pp. 127–8;Google Scholar
- J. Kelly, ‘Harvests and hardship: famine and scarcity in Ireland in the late 1720s’, Studia Hibernica, 26 (1991–2): 65–106, pp. 79–81, 85, 87;Google Scholar
- E. Magennis, ‘Coal, corn and canals: the dispersal of public moneys’, in D.W. Hayton (ed.), The Irish Parliament in the eighteenth century (Edinburgh, 2001): 71–86, pp. 76–8.Google Scholar
- 47.See P. Walsh, Castletown (Dublin, 2007).Google Scholar
- 51.McParland, Public architecture, p. 187, 188–9; S. O’Reilly, ‘Poor Palladianism or not? Some alternative sources for the early Georgian villa in Ireland’, in D. Arnold (ed.), The Georgian Villa (Stroud, 1996): 48–60, pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
- 53.E. Mc. Parland, ‘Edward Lovett Pearce and the Parliament House in Dublin’, Burlington Magazine, 131/1031 (1989): 91–100, p. 100.Google Scholar
- 55.A.K. Longfield, ‘The history of tapestry-making in Ireland in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’, JRSAI, 68 (1938): 91–105, pp. 94–8.Google Scholar
- 56.F.G. James, ‘The active Irish peers in the early eighteenth century’, Journal of British Studies, 18/2 (1979): 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.D. Hayton, ‘Ireland and the English ministers, 1707–16’ (D.Phil. diss., Oxford, 1975), pp. 11, 99.Google Scholar
- 70.Evidence for which is compiled in K. Berland, ‘Chesterfield demands the muse: Dublin print culture, poetry and the “Irish” voice’, ECI, 17 (2002): 121–45.Google Scholar
- 71.The classic synopsis of the domestic scene is J. McDonnell, Irish eighteenth-century stuccowork and its European sources (Dublin, 1991).Google Scholar
- For the room, see E. McParland, review of T. Mowl and B. Earnshaw, An insular rococo: architecture, politics and society in Ireland and England, 1710–1770 (London, 1999), in Burlington Magazine, 142, 1167 (2000): 379–80, p. 380.Google Scholar
- 73.M. Fraser, ‘Public building and colonial policy in Dublin, 1760–1800’, Architectural History 28 (1985): 102–23, pp. 103–6. R. Thorpe, ‘Thomas Cooley and the Royal Exchange, Dublin’ (B.A. diss., Department of the History of Art, TCD, 2002), and ead., ‘Thomas Cooley before the Dublin Royal Exchange’, IADS, 8 (2005): 70–85, are thus far the ultimate studies of Cooley in Dublin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.P. Rogers (ed.), Jonathan Swift: the complete poems (Oxford, 1983), pp. 283.Google Scholar
- 81.R. Bucholz, The Augustan Court: Queen Anne and the decline of court Culture (Stanford, 1993);Google Scholar
- H. Smith, ‘The court in England, 1714–60: a declining political institution?’, History, 90 (2005): 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 83.Barnard, Making the grand figure, p. 9; M.J. Powell, The politics of consumption in eighteenth-century Ireland (Basingstoke, 2002), pp. 146–7.Google Scholar
- 94.P.B. Glynn, ‘The Dublin Spy’, DHR, 14/1 (1955): 20–5, p. 22.Google Scholar
- 95.S. Murphy, ‘The Dublin anti-union riot of 3 December 1759’, in G. O’Brien (ed.), Parliament, politics and people (Blackrock, 1989): 49–68.Google Scholar
- 98.S. Murphy, ‘Charles Lucas and the Dublin Election of 1748–1749’, Parliamentary History, 2 (1983): 93–112, p. 102; TCD, Ms. 2022, ff. 65–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 99.B. Fitzgerald (ed.), Correspondence of Emily, Duchess of Leinster (1731–1814) (3 vols., Dublin, 1949–57), i, 15–16.Google Scholar
- 104.On top of Hill, From Patriots to Unionists (as n.103), see J. Smyth, ‘Republicanism before the United Irishmen: the case of Dr Charles Lucas’, in R. Eccleshall and V. Geoghegan (eds.), Political discourse in seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Ireland (Basingstoke, 2001): 240–56.Google Scholar
- 112.Carpenter (ed.), Eighteenth-century verse, pp. 103–7; J.J. Webb, The guilds of Dublin (Dublin, 1929), pp. 256–60.Google Scholar
- 114.J. O’Keeffe, Recollections (2 vols., London, 1826), i, 39–43.Google Scholar
- 115.R. Darnton, The great cat massacre and other episodes in French cultural history (London, 1984), 105–40.Google Scholar
- 119.Pooley’s ubiquity is affirmed in J. Fenlon, “Old Pooley the Painter: the life and career of a seventeenth-century painter in Dublin’, IADS, 7 (2004): 13–27.Google Scholar
- 130.M.J. Powell, ‘Political toasting in eighteenth-century Ireland’, History, 91/304 (2006): 508–29, pp. 512, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 131.C.M. Geraghty, ‘The Tailors’ Hall and the Weavers’ Hall, Dublin’ (B.A. diss., Department of the History of Art, TCD, 1989), pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
- 132.F.E. Dixon, ‘The Dublin Tailors and their Hall’, DHR, 12/1 (1968): 147–59; DCLA, Gilbert Ms. 80, p. 79.Google Scholar
- 138.E. McParland, ‘James Gandon and the Royal Exchange competition’, JRSAI, 102 (1972): 50–70.Google Scholar
- 141.J. Gandon and T.J. Mulvany (eds.), The life of James Gandon, Esq. (Dublin, 1846), p. 45.Google Scholar
- 143.See P. Lenehan, ‘Edward Smyth’, IAR Yearbook, 3 (1989–90): 67–76, pp. 67–8.Google Scholar