Introduction – Towards a Post-Liberal Peace

Exploring Hybridity via Everyday Forms of Resistance, Agency and Autonomy
  • Oliver P. Richmond
  • Audra Mitchell
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)


Peace is not a universal concept that can be transposed identically between different contexts of conflict. Rather, unique forms of peace arise when the strategies, institutions and norms of international, largely liberal–democratic peacebuilding interventions collide with the everyday lives of local actors affected by conflict. At the site of each international peace intervention, an interface forms at which the everyday activities, needs, interests and experiences of local groups and the goals, norms and practices of international policy-makers/implementers overlap. Within this space, a unique range of practices, responses and agencies – including plural forms of acceptance and appropriation, resistance and the exertion of autonomy – emerges and ‘hybridizes’1 the ‘blueprints’2 for peace advanced by international actors. In the process of hybridization, actors (both locally and internationally based) reshape the norms, institutions and activities in question by means of everyday practices such as verbal interaction, organization and even overt conflict.


Civil Society Everyday Life Local Actor Social Movement International Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Roger Mac Ginty, ‘Indigenous Peace-Making versus the Liberal Peace’, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2008, pp. 139–163.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oliver P. Richmond and Jason Franks, Liberal Peace Transitions, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Audra Mitchell, Lost in Transformation: Violent Peace and Peaceful Conflict in Northern Ireland, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 8.
    Audra Mitchell, ‘Peace beyond Process?’, Millennium Journal of International Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2010, pp. 641–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 9.
    Audra Mitchell, Lost in Transformation: Peace and Radical Change in Northern Ireland, Belfast: Queen’s University of Belfast, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 24.
    Oliver P. Richmond, ‘Eirinism and a Post-Liberal Peace’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2009, pp. 557–580; Audra Mitchell, ‘Quality/Control: International Interventions and the “Everyday” ’, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  7. 27.
    ‘Leaning to learn’ is how Kapoor puts it. Ilan Kapoor, The Post-Colonial Politics of Development, London: Routledge, 2008, p. 56.Google Scholar
  8. 28.
    Amity Acharya, ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,’ International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2004, pp. 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 30.
    John Keane, Global Civil Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 32.
    Beatrice Pouligny, Peace Operations Seen From Below, London: Hurst, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. 34.
    Robin Luckham, ‘Introduction: Transforming Security and Development in an Unequal World’, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 2, March, 2009, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 35.
    Jonathan Spencer, Anthropology, Politics and the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 36.
    James C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Peasant Resistance, Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 37.
    Mark Mazower, Inside Hitler’s Greece, 1941–1945, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 38.
    Alberto Melucci, ‘Social Movements and the Democratisation of Everyday Life’, in John Keane (ed.), Civil Society and the State, London: Verso, pp. 245–260.Google Scholar
  16. 39.
    Arturo Escobar, Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 40.
    Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984, p. xi.Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    Michel Foucault. History of Sexuality, Vol. 3: The Care of the Self, New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. 42.
    See Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 43.
    Jurgen Habermas, ‘Questions and Counter Questions’, in R. J. Bernstein (ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985, pp. 196–197.Google Scholar
  21. 44.
    Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998, p. 31.Google Scholar
  22. 45.
    Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture, London: Routledge, 1994, p. 232.Google Scholar
  23. 46.
    Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988, pp. 271–313.Google Scholar
  24. 47.
    Roland Bleiker, Aesthetics and World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 64.
    Claudia Aradau and Jeff Huysmans, ‘Mobilisation and Global Democracy’, Millennium, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2009, pp. 583–604, at p. 587.Google Scholar
  26. 65.
    Cited in Saul Newman, ‘Connolly’s Democratic Pluralism and the Question of State Sovereignty’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 10, 2007, pp. 227–240.Google Scholar
  27. 68.
    David Ucko, ‘Militias, Tribes, and Insurgents: The Challenge of Political Reintergration in Iraq’, Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2008, pp. 341–373, at p. 365.Google Scholar
  28. 75.
    Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  29. 78.
    Raoul Vaneigem. Revolution of Everyday Life, London: Rebel Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  30. 80.
    Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus, London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
  31. 84.
    Charles Taylor. A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2007.Google Scholar
  32. 110.
    Rosemary E. Shinko, ‘Agonistic Peace: A Postmodern Reading’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2008, pp. 473–491.Google Scholar
  33. 113.
    Julian Eckl, ‘Responsible Scholarship after Leaving the Veranda’, International Political Sociology, Vol. 2, 2008, pp. 187–190.Google Scholar
  34. 114.
    Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977; Scott, Weapons of the Weak.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oliver P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver P. Richmond
  • Audra Mitchell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations