The International Underworld

  • Paul Knepper

Abstract

When J.B. Priestly visited the Nottingham Goose Fair in 1931, he did not spot any geese. But, Priestly did notice Al Capone’s armoured car on display. For Priestly, theatre critic and author, reference to this notorious gangster confirmed one more way in which Britain was becoming more like America. During his tour of England that year, he found a medieval Britain of cathedrals and market towns, a Victorian Britain of railway termini, and a post-war Britain that had been born in America. ‘This is the England of arterial by-pass roads, of filling stations and factories that look like exhibition buildings, of giant cinemas and dance halls and cafés, bungalows with tiny garages, cocktail bars, Woolworths, motor-coaches, wireless, hiking, factory girls looking like actresses…’1

Keywords

International Crime Crime Commission Metropolitan Police Dance Hall Chief Constable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    J.B. Priestly, English Journey (London: William Heinemann, 1934), pp 22, 401.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Philip Jenkins and Gary W. Potter, ‘Before the Krays: Organized Crime in London, 1920–1960’ Criminal Justice History 9 (1988) pp 209–30. Reference to the ‘third-degree’ methods by police was, as John Carter Wood explains, part of the broader cultural influence of America on Britain.Google Scholar
  3. John Carter Wood, ‘“The Third Degree”: Press Reporting, Crime Fiction and Police Powers in 1920s Britain’ Twentieth Century British History 21 (2010) pp 464–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    Robert Waite, ‘Law Enforcement and Crime in America: The View from Germany, 1920–1940’ Criminal Justice History 13 (1992) pp 191–216;Google Scholar
  5. David H. Walker, ‘Cultivating the fait divers: DétectiveNottingham French Studies 31 (1992) pp 71–84;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Annette Finley-Croswhite and Gayle K. Brunelle, ‘“Murder in the Metro”: Masking and Unmasking Laetitia Toureaux in 1930s France’ French Cultural Studies 14 (2003) pp 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Peter Miles and Malcolm Smith, Cinema, Literature and Society: Elite and Mass Culture in Interwar Britain (London: Croom Helm, 1987) pp 163–79. That said, film-makers were a rather cosmopolitan lot. German émigrés brought about a German influence on American films; this was particularly evident in the ‘film noir’ genre.Google Scholar
  8. Richard W. McCormick, Gender and Sexuality in Weimar Modernity: Film, Literature and the ‘New Objectivity’ (New York: Palgrave, 2001), p 19.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    William J. Brittain, ‘The Beginnings of Television’ Quarterly Review 496 (1928) pp 276–82.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Stuart Legg and Robert Fairthorne, The Cinema and Television (London: Longmans, 1939) p 74.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Steven L. Goldman, ‘Images of Technology in Popular Films: Discussion and Filmography’ Science, Technology and Human Values 14 (1989) pp 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. See, further, Sari Kawana, ‘Mad Scientists and Their Prey: Bioethics, Murder and Fiction in Interwar Japan’ Journal of Japanese Studies 31 (2005) pp 89–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 10.
    Florentine Strzelczyk, ‘Motors and Machines, Robots and Rockets: Harry Piel and Sci-Fi Film in the Third Reich’ German Studies Review 24 (2004) p 549. Heather Wolffram suggests that experiments with ‘criminal telepathy’ (asking a clairvoyant for help in cracking unsolved cases) was consistent with, rather than contradictory of, efforts to professionalise through science. To some extent, it also signified a certain ambiguity or ambivalence about scientific knowledge.Google Scholar
  14. Heather Wolffram, ‘Crime, Claivoyance and the Weimar Police’ Journal of Contemporary History 44 (2009) pp 581–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    Frederic Boutet, International Criminals Past and Present (London: Hutchison, 1930) p 34.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    Sheldon Glueck, Continental Police Practice in the Formative Years (Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1974; originally, 1926). The story of technology and crime was bigger, claimed Richard Enright, formerly commissioner of police in New York City, than immigration and crime. Enright urged the public to forget the ‘fallacious theory that the majority of our crimes are perpetuated by the so-called foreign element’. Truth told, the foreign element kept within the law to about the same degree as citizens from families that had been in America for generations. ‘We need to modernize our whole view of the problem,’ he urged, for we are dealing with the most modern businessman… The criminal of today takes full advantage of every discovery and invention of his time no less than any other industrial operative in this fiercely competitive age’. See Richard E. Enright, ‘Our Biggest Business—Crime’ North American Review 228 (1929) p 388.Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    Denys P. Myers, ‘The Criminal in the Air’ Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 4 (1914) pp 815–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    A.H. Sirks, ‘The Police and Dangerous Drugs’ The Police Journal 3 (1930) pp 565–6.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    Henry T.F. Rhodes, The Criminals We Deserve (London: Methuen, 1937) p 159.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.H. Thornton, ‘Aviation and the Police’ The Police Journal 8 (1935) pp 319–24.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Ruth Hall, Marie Stopes: A Biography (London: Andre Deutsch, 1977) p 265.Google Scholar
  22. 27.
    Arch Mandel, ‘The Automobile and the Police’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 116 (1924) p 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 28.
    F. Sempkins, Poverty and Prostitution: Unemployment and Prostitution of Young Girls (London: British Social Hygiene Council, 1935) p 32.Google Scholar
  24. 31.
    P.W. Wilson, ‘Criminal Law Enforcement in America and Europe’ Current History 27 (1927) p 830.Google Scholar
  25. 32.
    F.R. Leavis and Denys Thompson, Culture and Environment (London: Chatto and Windus, 1934) pp 2, 108–9.Google Scholar
  26. 33.
    Clarence Darrow, Crime: Its Cause and Treatment (London: George Harrap, 1922) pp 207–10.Google Scholar
  27. See further Philip Jenkins, ‘The Radicals and the Rehabilitative Ideal, 1890–1930’ Criminology 20 (1982) pp 347–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 34.
    Max G. Schlapp and Edward H. Smith, The New Criminology: A Consideration of the Chemical Causation of Behaviours (New York: Boni and Overight, 1928) pp 129–30.Google Scholar
  29. 35.
    Alice Goldfarb Marquis, ‘Written on the Wind: The Impact of Radio during the 1930s’ Journal of Contemporary History 19 (1984) p 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 37.
    Elena Razlogova, ‘True Crime Radio and Listener Disenchantment with Network Broadcasting, 1935–1946’ American Quarterly, p 142.Google Scholar
  31. 40.
    George Orwell, ‘Decline of the English Murder’ in Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays (London: Secker and Warburg, 1950) pp 197–202.Google Scholar
  32. 41.
    Chris Waters, ‘Beyond “Americanization”: Rethinking Anglo-American Cultural Exchange Between the Wars’ Cultural and Social History 4 (2007) pp 451–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 43.
    Andrew Davies, ‘The Scottish Chicago? From “Hooligans” to “Gangsters” in Inter-War Glasgow’ Cultural and Social History 4 (2007) pp 511–27. British cities were not the only European cities said to have fallen prey to American criminality. During the 1930s, the incidence of burglaries, robberies, violence and illegality in Barcelona led to the nickname the ‘Catalan Chicago’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Christopher Ealham, ‘Anarchism and Illegality in Barcelona, 1931–7’ Contemporary European History 4 (1995) pp 133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 44.
    Alexander McArthur, No Mean City (London: Longmans, 1935) pp 138, 323.Google Scholar
  36. 45.
    Percy Sillitoe, Cloak without Dagger (London: Quality Book Club, 1955), p 65. Other authorities adopted Sillitoe’s tactic. Judge Macardie, who levied sentences against several gang members for a razor attack on police, invited a police constable to comment on the gang violence. The constable testified that during the past two years there had been no fewer than ten ‘gang attacks’ on police and private citizens. This sort of violence seemed to be prevalent in the rising generation, particularly those between 17 and 30 years of age. ‘A Menace’ Yorkshire Telegraph and Star 10 December 1926, p 1.Google Scholar
  37. 47.
    Quoted in J.P. Bean, The Sheffield Gang Wars (Sheffield: D and D Publications, 2009) p 125.Google Scholar
  38. 50.
    Henry T.F. Rhodes, The Criminals We Deserve (London: Methuen, 1937) pp 183–4, 234.Google Scholar
  39. 51.
    Ruth Bowley, ‘Amusements and Entertainment’ in H. Llewellyn Smith, The New Survey of London Life and Labour, vol 9 (London: King and Son, 1935) pp 44–6.Google Scholar
  40. 52.
    David E. Ruth, Inventing the Public Enemy: The Gangster in American Culture, 1918–1934 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996);Google Scholar
  41. Christopher Shannon, ‘Public Enemies, Local Heroes: The Irish-American Gangster Film in Classic Hollywood Cinema’ New Hibernia Review 9 (2005) pp 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 53.
    Quoted in Siân Nicholas, ‘News, Current Affairs and the Limits of Anglo-American Exchange in Inter-War Britain’ Cultural and Social History 4 (2007) p 464.Google Scholar
  43. 55.
    Carleton Kemp Allen, ‘Movies and Morals’ Quarterly Review 486 (1925) pp 313–30.Google Scholar
  44. 56.
    P.W. Wilson, ‘The Crime Wave and the Movies’ Current Opinion 70 (1921) pp 320–4.Google Scholar
  45. 57.
    Jeffrey Richards, ‘The British Board of Film Censors and Control in the 1930s: Images of Britain’ Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 1 (1981) pp 105–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 61.
    Cyril Burt, The Young Delinquent (London: University of London Press, 1925) p 143.Google Scholar
  47. 62.
    J. Keller and Hanns Andersen (R. Belser, trns) The Jew as Criminal (Berlin: Nibelungen-Verlag, 1937) pp 93, 129.Google Scholar
  48. 63.
    Percy J. Smith, Con Man (London: Herbert Jenkins, 1938) p 264.Google Scholar
  49. 64.
    Rene Cassellari, Dramas of French Crime (London: Hutchinson, 1930) pp 161, 167.Google Scholar
  50. 65.
    Graham Greene, Brighton Rock (London: Heinemann, 1938) pp 84–8. In later editions, Colleoni becomes Italian. Curiously, there is a Guglielmo Ceccolini in one of Russell Pasha’s published reports. In 1931, Russell Pasha describes his breaking up of a smuggling ring involving Greek and Egyptian gangs led by Ceccolini, a steward aboard the Lloyd Trestino liner Victoria.Google Scholar
  51. Donald R. Thomas, Detective Fiction and the Rise of Forensic Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) p 262.Google Scholar
  52. 67.
    Martha F. Lee, ‘Nesta Webster: The Voice of Conspiracy’ Journal of Women’s History 17 (2005) p 92. During her study of a romance involving two French aristocrats, she became convinced she had personally experienced the French Revolution. She leaned toward the Buddhist view of reincarnation, and eventually came to believe she was the reincarnation of one of the subjects in her first ‘nonfiction’ book, the Comtesse de Sabran.Google Scholar
  53. 68.
    Nesta Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements (London: Boswell, 1936) pp 393, 397.Google Scholar
  54. 69.
    Markku Ruotsila, ‘Lord Sydenham of Combe’s World Jewish Conspiracy’ Patterns of Prejudice 34 (2000) pp 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 71.
    Basil Thomson, My Experiences at Scotland Yard (New York: Doubleday, 1923) pp 319–20.Google Scholar
  56. See Gisela Lebzelter, Political Anti-Semitism in England 1918–1939 (London: Macmillan, 1978) pp 13–28.Google Scholar
  57. 73.
    Charles Coughlin, Money: Questions and Answers (National Union for Social Justice, 1936) pp 76, 160, 170.Google Scholar
  58. 74.
    James Shenton, ‘The Coughlin Movement and the New Deal’ Political Science Quarterly 73 (1958) pp 352–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 75.
    Boris Brasol, ‘Foundations of Criminology’ Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 17 (1926) pp 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Boris Brasol, ‘Institute of Scientific Criminology’ American Journal of Police 1 (1930) pp 100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 76.
    Boris Brasol, Crime, Criminology and Criminological Institutes (Vizianagaram City, India: Andhra Research University, 1938) pp 8–9. Copy in the British Library, London.Google Scholar
  62. 77.
    Boris Brasol, Socialism and Civilization (New York: Charles Schribner’s, 1920) pp 114, 163, 189.Google Scholar
  63. 81.
    Timothy Ryback, Hitler’s Private Library: The Books that Shaped His Life (London: Bodley Head, 2009) pp 69–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul Knepper 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Knepper
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations