Advertisement

Worldwide Crime Wave

  • Paul Knepper

Abstract

When experts of the 1920s and 1930s talked about crime, they used the vocabulary of crime waves. A ‘crime wave’ could refer to a surge of criminality in general, to the appearance of a novel method of breaking the law, or to the rise of a new population of criminals in society. Sometimes, reference was made to a source of statistics, but more often than not, crime wave theory had to do with expectation rather than description. Wave theorists talked most about how a series of recent criminal events signalled a trend likely to continue into the future. A wave of crime could threaten a city, nation, or as a number of police, prison authorities, journalists and academics feared, the entire planet. ‘The crime wave now afflicting the whole world’ American writer Joseph Gollomb declared, following his tour of European capitals in 1921, ‘is a logical aftermath of the war. Economic distress—poverty, insufficient food, clothing and fuel—the loosening of men’s animal passions, coupled with the general disorganization of social structure, are producing their inevitable effect’.1

Keywords

Prison Population Crime Statistic International Crime National Socialist State Royal Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Joseph Gollomb, ‘Meeting the Crime Wave: A Comparison of Methods’ The Nation 112 (19 January 1921) p 80.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Clifford Rosenberg, Policing Paris: The Origins of Modern Immigration Control Between the Wars (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006);Google Scholar
  3. Mae M. Ngai, ‘The Strange Career of the Illegal Alien: Immigration Restriction and Deportation Policy in the United States’ Law and History Review 21 (2003) pp 69–107. Rosenberg sees immigration restriction practices of the 1920s as an immediate consequence of the Great War. Others have argued that immigration policies in the 1920s did not reflect the war but trends in place from the late nineteenth century.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. See Christiane Reinecke, ‘Governing Aliens in Times of Upheaval: Immigration Control and Modern State Practice in Early Twentieth-Century Britain, Compared with Prussia’ International Review of Social History 54 (2009) pp 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    Hew Strachan, The First World War (London: Simon and Schuster, 2003) pp 67–71.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Zara Steiner, The Lights That Failed: European International History, 1919–1933 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) pp 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cecil Chapman, ‘War and Criminality’ The Sociological Review 9 (1916–1917) p 80.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Margaret Wynn Nevinson, Life’s Fitful Fever: A Volume of Memories (London: A & C Black, 1926) pp 277–8. Elizabeth Nelson points to alcohol-related problems, in addition to psychological conditions, in explaining the motivation behind returning soldiers who engaged in violence against spouses. She cautions against making ‘automatic assumptions about the extent to which war service led men to act violently towards their wives after returning home’. Drawing on material concerning several cases, she demonstrates how war experience provided ‘new ways of explaining men’s violence against their wives’, enabling perpetrators to attract considerable public sympathy despite their brutality.Google Scholar
  9. Elizabeth Nelson, ‘Victims of War: The First World War, Returned Soldiers, and Understandings of Domestic Violence in Australia’ Journal of Women’s History 19 (2007) pp 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 12.
    Augustin Hamon, Lessons of the World-War (London: T. Fischer Unwin, 1918) pp 62, 355.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Edith Abbott, ‘Crime and the War’ Journal of the American Institute of Crime and Criminology 9 (1918) p 40.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Ellen C. Potter, ‘Spectacular Aspects of Crime in Relation to the Crime Wave’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 125 (1926) pp 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 15.
    Hugo Pam, ‘Annual Address of the President of the Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology’ Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 10 (1919) p 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    William L. Chenery, ‘Worldwide Crime Wave’ New York Times 10 October 1920, pp 2–3.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Richard Bessel, Germany After the First World War (Oxford: Clarendon, 1993) pp 243–5. Bessel concludes that available statistics ‘fail to provide unambiguous evidence of a massive wave of violent crime’ and that while statistics for theft do suggest an increase, this was likely caused not by the effects of war as inflation. The nature of the post-war crime wave shows how important the collapse of the currency was as a cause of the apparent decline in moral order.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Sace Elder, Murder Scenes: Normality, Deviance and Criminal Violence in Weimar Berlin (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2010) pp 22–3.Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    Ted Bogacz, ‘War Neurosis and Cultural Change in England, 1914–22: The Work of the War Office Committee of Enquiry into “Shell-Shock”’ Journal of Contemporary History 24 (1989) p 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. See also Eric Dean, ‘War and Psychiatry: Examining the Diffusion Theory in Light of the Insanity Defence in Post-War War I Britain’ History of Psychiatry 4 (1993) pp 61–82;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Susan Kingsley Kent, Making Peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Interwar Britain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993) pp 97–113.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Ernest Jones, ‘War Shock and Freud’s Theory of the Neuroses’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 11 (1918) pp 25, 27.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Philip Gibbs, Realities of War (London: William Heinemann, 1920) pp 432, 445, 450, 452; Hubert Norman, ‘War and Mental Disorders’ Quarterly Review 461 (1919) p 296.Google Scholar
  22. 35.
    John Torpey, ‘The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Passport System’ pp 56–70 in Jane Caplan and John Torpey, eds, Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  23. See also David Shearer, ‘Elements Near and Alien: Passportization, Policing and Identity in the Stalinist State 1932–1952’ Journal of Modern History 76 (2004) pp 835–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 36.
    Harold Scott, ‘The Control of Aliens’ The Police Journal 5 (1932) pp 27–9.Google Scholar
  25. 38.
    E.S. Roscoe, ‘Aliens in Great Britain’ Transactions of the Grotius Society 16 (1930) pp 65–72.Google Scholar
  26. 43.
    A.H. Lane, The Alien Menace 2nd Edition (London: St Stephens Publishing, 1929) pp 130–1.Google Scholar
  27. 44.
    Matthew Hendley, ‘Anti-Alienism and the Primrose League: The Externalization of the Postwar Crisis in Great Britain 1918–32’ Albion 33 (2001) pp 256–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 47.
    Eugen Weber, The Hollow Years: France in the 1930s (London: Sinclair-Stevenson, 1995) p 215.Google Scholar
  29. 48.
    Katherine Foshko, ‘The Paul Doumer Assassination and the Russian Diaspora in Interwar France’ French History 23 (2009) p 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 49.
    Paul Lawrence, ‘Adverse Perceptions of Immigrants in France Between the Wars’ French History 14 (2000) p 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 52.
    Harry J. Greenwall, The Underworld of Paris (London: Stanley Paul, 1921) pp 179–85.Google Scholar
  32. 54.
    Maria Tatar, Lustmord: Sexual Murder in Weimar Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995) p 59.Google Scholar
  33. 55.
    Henry Pratt Fairchild, ‘The Immigration Law of 1924’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 38 (1924) pp 657–62.Google Scholar
  34. 57.
    Edwin Grant, ‘Scum from the Melting Pot’ American Journal of Sociology 30 (1925) pp 641–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 58.
    Mark O. Prentiss, ‘War on the Growing Menace of Crime’ Current History Magazine 13 (1925) pp 6–7.Google Scholar
  36. 61.
    Walter G. Beach, Oriental Crime in California (London: Humphry Milford, 1932) pp 93–4.Google Scholar
  37. 62.
    J.B. Priestly, English Journey (London: William Heinemann, 1934) p 276.Google Scholar
  38. 63.
    John Stevenson and Chris Cook, Britain and the Depression: Society and Politics 1929–39 (London: Longman, 1994) pp 65–6.Google Scholar
  39. 64.
    Janet Clark, ‘Sincere and Reasonable Men? The Origins of the National Council for Civil Liberties’ Twentieth Century British History 20 (2009) p 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 67.
    S.K. Ruck, ‘The Increase of Crime in England’ Political Quarterly 3 (1932) pp 206–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 70.
    A.M. Carr-Saunders, ‘Crime and Unemployment’ Political Quarterly 5 (1934) pp 395–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 72.
    S.K. Ruck, ‘Crime’ in H. Llewellyn Smith, The New Survey of London Life and Labour, vol 9 (London: King and Son, 1935) pp 349–52, 363.Google Scholar
  43. 77.
    Clayton Ettinger, The Problem of Crime (New York: Ray Long, 1832) pp 156–7.Google Scholar
  44. 78.
    Vernon Jones, ‘Relation of Economic Depression to Delinquency, Crime and Drunkenness in Massachusetts’ Journal of Social Psychology 3 (1932) pp 259–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 79.
    George B. Vold, ‘The Amount and Nature of Crime’ American Journal of Sociology 40 (1935) pp 796–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 81.
    Thorsten Sellin, Research Memorandum on Crime in the Depression (New York: Social Science Research Council, 1937). John Pandiani argues that crime in the United States would have been higher had in not been for the Roosevelt administration’s investment in poverty-relief measures, specifically, the Civilian Conservation Corps.Google Scholar
  47. John A. Pandiani, ‘The Crime Control Corps: An Invisible New Deal Program’ British Journal of Sociology 33 (1982) pp 348–58. Statistical evidence from Mexico City suggests ‘a weak causal relationship between economic indicators and theft’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. See Pablo Piccato, City of Suspects: Crime in Mexico City, 1900–1931 (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001) pp 135–6. James P. Huzel presents statistical evidence for an increase in property crime in Vancouver between 1929 and 1931, and suggests that official figures for this likely underestimate the extent of such criminal activity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. James P. Huzel, ‘The Incidence of Crime in Vancouver During the Great Depression’ British Columbia Quarterly 69–70 (1986) pp 211–47.Google Scholar
  50. 82.
    Morris Ploscowe, ‘Some Factors in Criminality’ National Commission on Law Observance Enforcement: Report on the Causes of Crime (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1931) pp 111, 140.Google Scholar
  51. 83.
    See Wolfgang Ayass, ‘Vagrants and Beggars in Hitler’s Reich’ pp 210–37 in Richard J. Evans, ed, The German Underworld: Deviants and Outcasts in German History (London: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar
  52. 85.
    Victoria Stewart, ‘Violence and Representation in Elizabeth Bowen’s Interwar Short Stories’ English 38 (2009) pp 146–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul Knepper 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Knepper
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations