Between Concealment and Eloquence
Abstract
Beautiful—that’s the excuse
Honorable—for this is what the social conventions demand
Virgin—to make the achievement even more brilliant1
Georges Duby gives a clear picture of a desirable mistress in medieval Provence: she must be so beautiful that a man cannot help falling in love with her at once and, therefore, be the victim; she has to be honorable so that loving her is a sign of an appreciation for good manners and a respect for what counts in noble society; and, last but not least, she must be a virgin and whomever she finally loves will be the one and only man in her life. Medieval Provençal didactic literature, especially the so-called ensenhamen, provides other, contemporary, more gratifying descriptions of what a woman must be and do to please a man in twelfth- and thirteenth- century Provence; however, and the rules they set down for women’s behavior will be the subject of this chapter.
Keywords
Thirteenth Century Courtly Community Female Role Model Ideal Woman Courtly LovePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 6.Albert Stimming, “Provenzalische Litteratur,” in Grundriss der romanischen Philologie, ed. Gustav Gröber, 2 vols, in 3 parts (Strasbourg: K. J. Trübner, 1888–1902), 2.2:51; Bohs, 206.Google Scholar
- 7.Katharina Städtler has written an interesting chapter about the domna in her Altprovenzalische Frauendichtung (1150–1250): Historisch-soziologische Untersuchungen und Interpretationen (Heidelberg: Winter, 1990), 147–149.Google Scholar
- 10.Ed. Karl Bartsch, in idem, Provenzalisches Lesebuch, mit einer literarischen Einleitung und einem Wörterbuche (Elberfeld: R. L. Friderichs, 1855; reprint Geneva: Slatkine, 1974), 140–148.Google Scholar
- 27.Sordello, “The Instruction in Honor/Ensenhamen d’Onor,” in The Poetry of’sordello, ed. and trans. James J. Wilhelm (New York: Garland, 1987), 1. 1173–1192, p. 206–207.Google Scholar
- 28.René Nelli, Le Roman de Flamenca, un art d’aimer occitanien du XIIIe siècle (Toulouse: Institut d’études occitanes, 1966; rpt. Toulouse: Institut d’études occitanes, 1989), 114.Google Scholar