Advertisement

Do We Need to Discuss Legitimacy at All Levels of Governance?

  • Peter Klen-Hong Yu
  • Miin Huui Lee

Abstract

In the last decade or two, the study of governance has increasingly come into vogue, especially with the rise of civil society at the domestic and international levels, although the concept is as old as human civilization.1 Some academics predict that the study of international governance may well supplant, if not replace, (neo-)Realism as the mainstream school of thought in less than 15 years. That may well be the case if we want to be closer to reality in our description, explanation, and inference or prediction of politics, economics, and societal affairs. This chapter attempts to find out whether or not legitimacy, an essentially contested term,2 must be discussed when we talk about governance at various selected levels.

Keywords

Corporate Governance World Trade Organization Good Governance International Governance International Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Callahan, William A., 2006. Cultural Governance and Resistance in Pacific Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, Jie, and Bruce J. Dickson, 2010. Allies of the State: China’s Private Entrepreneurs and Democratic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Estrom, Elinor, 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gries, Peter Hays, and Stanley Rosen, eds., 2010. Chinese Politics: State, Society, and the Market. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Guo, Baogang, and Dennis Hickey, eds., 2010. Toward Better Governance in China. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. IMF, 1997. Good Governance: The IMF’s Role. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  7. Inkster, Ian, ed., 2009. History of Technology. London: The Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. Institute of Directors, 2009. The Handbook of International Corporate Governance, 2nd ed. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  9. Kim, W Chan, and Renée Mauborgne, October 2004. “Blue Ocean Strategy.” Harvard Business Review, October, pp. 76–85.Google Scholar
  10. Kim, W Chan, and Renée Mauborgne, 2005. Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, W Chan, and Renée Mauborgne, September 2009. “How Strategy Shapes Structure,” Harvard Business Review, 73–80.Google Scholar
  12. Love, Maryann C., 2011. “God and Governance.” In Beyond Sovereignty: Issues for a Global Agenda, 4th ed. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.Google Scholar
  13. Luo, Yadong, 2007. Global Dimensions of Corporate Governance. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. McGregor, Richard, 2010. The Party: The Secret of World of Communist Rulers. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  15. Naisbitt, John, and Doris Naisbitt, 2010. China’s Megatrends: The 8 Pillars of New Society. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  16. Ougaard, Morten, and Anna Leander, eds., 2010. Business and Global Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Parenti, Michael, 2011. Democracy for the Few, 8th ed. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.Google Scholar
  18. Saich, Tony, 2000. “Globalization, Governance, and the Authoritarian State: China.” In Joseph S. Nye, Jr., and John D. Donahue, eds., Governance in a Globalizing World, pp. 208–28. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  19. Samson, Danny, and Richard L. Daft, 2009. Fundamentals of Management, 3rd Asia Pacific ed. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Cengage Learning Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Scholte, Jan A., February 2004. “Globalization and Governance: From Statism to Polycentrism.” Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Régionalisation Working Paper, No. 130/04.Google Scholar
  21. Spero, Joan E., and Jeffrey A. Hart, 2010. The Politics of International Economic Relations, 7th ed. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.Google Scholar
  22. Vogler, John, 1995. The Global Commons: A Regime Analysis. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Wang Mengkui, ed., 2009. Good Governance in ChinaA Way Towards Social Harmony: Case Studies by China’s Rising Leaders. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. White, Lynn T., 2005. “Introduction—Dimensions of Legitimacy.” In Lynn T. White, ed., Legitimacy: Ambiguities Of Political Success Or Failure In East And Southeast Asia, pp. 1–28. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Williamson, Oliver E., July 1988. “Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance 43, no. 3: 576–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, James Q., and John J. Dilulio, Jr., 2011. American Government: Institutions and Policies, 12th ed. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.Google Scholar
  27. World Bank, May 1992. Governance and Development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yu, Peter Kien-hong, 2010. God Is, by Inference, One-dot: Paradigm Shift. Boca Raton, Florida: Universal-Publishers, p. 165.Google Scholar
  29. Yu, Peter Kien-hong, 2012 (forthcoming). International Governance and Regime: A Chinese Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Yu, Peter Kien-hong, and W Emily Chow, 2009. “A Critique of the Chinese Translations for the Term, International Regimes.” Taiwanese Journal of WTO Studies Vol. XIII.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deng Zhenglai and Sujian Guo 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Klen-Hong Yu
  • Miin Huui Lee

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations