Will a “Deliberative Mechanism” Increase and Consolidate the Legitimacy of Local Governance in China?
In the history of Western political thought, political legitimacy has acquired methodological and empirical specifications based on two approaches. The first is concerned with “what should be” the value of the problem. In other words, this political power values virtues, justice, and good moral standards or political principles, even if it does not receive public recognition and support. The second approach is worried about “what actually is,” an issue of fact. To put it simply, as long as the masses are in favor of the political power, the regime has legitimacy.
KeywordsChinese Communist Party Deliberative Democracy Local Governance Political Legitimacy Public Budget
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Easton, David (1979). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Giddens, Anthony (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, Jürgen (1979). Communication and The Evolution of Society (Chinese version). Chongqing: Chongqing Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, Jürgen (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- He, Zengke (2007). “Political Legitimacy and Innovation of Chinese Local Government: An Experiential Research,” Kunming: Journal of Yunnan School of Administration (2): 8–13.Google Scholar
- Lin, Shangli (2007). “The Popular Consultation and the Development of Grassroots Democracy in China,” Shanghai: Academic Monthly (9): 13–20.Google Scholar
- Roskin, Michael G., Robert L. Cord, James A. Medeiros, and Walter S. Jones (2007). Political Science: An Introduction (10th Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Tan, Huosheng (2007). Democratic Deliberation and Political Legitimacy. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar