Advertisement

The Rise of Civil Society and China in Global Governance

  • Guangqiu Xu

Abstract

The rise of civil society in the international arena and the role of civil society in global politics have received much scholarly attention in recent years. Civil society is playing a role in international development that has an impact on China in global governance. This chapter will discuss the rise of civil society in the world and its major contributions, positive and negative, to world politics and investigate the implications of the rise of civil society in China to global governance. This study will show that China, as a rising power, is engaged actively in international affairs and is promoting good global governance, and that China not only plays a constructive role in international organizations such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organization but also plays a part in dealing with some major international challenges. The study argues that the rise of civil society and the rise of China are two important movements in global governance and that these two trends not only serve to increase progressively the effectiveness of the global system, but also will play more important roles in global governance in the future.

Keywords

Civil Society World Trade Organization Global Governance World Politics African National Congress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Reading

  1. Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration. Aldershot: Elga.Google Scholar
  2. Baylis, J., and S. Smith (eds.) (1997). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to World Politics, 13–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bello, W. (2005). Dilemmas of Domination. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, P. (2003). Against Global Apartheid. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bond, P. (2005). Elite Transition. Pietermaritzburg: University of Kwa Zulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, P. (2005). Elite Transition. Pietermaritzburg: University of Kwa Zulu-Natal Press. Chan, Lai-Ha, Pak K. Lee, and Gerald Chan (2008). “Rethinking Global Governance: A China Model in the Making?” Contemporary Politics 14, no. 1: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chetley, A. (1986). The Politics of Baby Foods: Successful Challenges to an International Marketing Strategy. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. L., and A. Arato (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cutler, A. C. (ed.) (1999). Private Authority in International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deng, Lansong (2004). “Quyu zuzhihua yu zhongguo” (Organized regions and China), Shijie jinji yanjiu (The study of world economics) 9: 80–81.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, M., and D. Hulme (1996). Too Close for Comfort? Donors, NGOs and States. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1991). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, J. (2006). Global Shadows. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gu, Jing, and John Humphrey (2008). “Global Governance and Developing Countries: The Implications of the Rise of China,” World Development 36, no. 2: 274–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu, Jian (2006). “Quanqiu shehui yundong de xingqi ji qi dui quanqiu zhili de yingxiang” (The growth of the international social campaigns and its efforts on global governance), Guoji luntan (International forum) 1: 1–3.Google Scholar
  16. Ji, W., and L. Wang (2005). WTO Dispute Settlement Rules and China’s Practice. Beijing, Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, S., and B. Rogaly (1997). Microfinance and Poverty Reduction. Oxford: Oxfam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Korten, D. C. (1990). Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global Agenda. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.Google Scholar
  19. Mawle, A. (1997). “Women, Environment and the United Nations.” In The Way Forward: Beyond Agenda 21, ed. F. Dodds, 155. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  20. Mittelman, J. H., and R. Johnston (1999). “The Globalization of Organized Crime, the Courtesan State, and the Corruption of Civil Society,” Global Governance, 5: 103–26.Google Scholar
  21. Pan, Guang, and Dai Yichen (2006). “Ya’ou huiyi yu yatai diqu zuzhi de hudong guanxi” (The relationship between the Asian-Europe Meetings and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation), Guoji wenti yanjiu (The study of international issues) 5: 30–32.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenau, J. N., and E. O. Czempiel (eds.) (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Scholte, J. A. (1999a). “In the Foothills: Relations between the IMF and Civil Society.” In R. Higgott and A. Bieler (eds.), Non-State Actors and Authority in the Global System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Scholte, J. A. (1999b). “Global Civil Society: Changing the World?” CSGR Working Paper No. 31.Google Scholar
  25. Scholte, J. A., R. O’Brien, and M. Williams (1999). “The WTO and Civil Society,” Journal of World Trade, 33: 107–24.Google Scholar
  26. Simmons, P. J. (1998). “Learning to Live with NGOs,” Foreign Policy, 111.Google Scholar
  27. Smillie, I. (1999). “At Sea in a Sieve? Trends and Issues in the Relationship between Northern NGOs and Northern Governments,” in Smillie and Helmich, 17–18.Google Scholar
  28. Smillie, I., and H. Helmich (eds.) (1999). Stakeholders: Government-NGO Partnerships for International Development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Spiro, P. (1994). “New Global Communities: Nongovernmental Organizations in International Decision-Making Institutions,” Washington Quarterly, 18: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tanaka, Hitoshi (2008). “The Crisis of Global Governance and the Rise of East Asia,” East Asia Insights 3, no. 4: 1–8.Google Scholar
  31. Turner, B. S., and P. Hamilton (eds.) (1994). Citizenship: Critical Concepts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Union of International Associations (1998). Yearbook of International Organizations 1998/99, Vol. I, 1764.Google Scholar
  33. Van Rooy, A. (1998). Civil Society and the Aid Industry. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  34. Wang, Hongying, and James Rosenau (2009). “China and Global Governance,” Asian Perspective 33, no. 3: 5–39.Google Scholar
  35. Wang, Tiejun, and Zhang Jingna (2003). “Quanqiu zhili, WTO yu kuaguo gongmin shehui,” (Global governance, WTO and transnational civil society), Shangdong daxue xuebao (Academic journal of Shangdong University) 6: 156–60.Google Scholar
  36. Weiss, L. (1998). The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, P. (1994). ‘Transnational Criminal Organizations and International Security,” Survival, 36: 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson, Z. (2006). The UN and Democracy in Africa: Labyrinths of Legitimacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Windsperger, G. (1997). “NGOs and the IMF: Shared Goals—Different Approaches,” IMF Staff News (March): 7.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, E. M. (1990). “The Uses and Abuses of “Civil Society.”’ In Socialist Register 1990, ed. R. Miliband, 61–62. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
  41. Zhou, Jun (2008). “Quanqiu gongmin shehui zai zhili jiegou zhong de zuoyong ji qi xiandu (International civil society’s role in global governance and its restriction), Makesizhuyi yu xianshi (Marxism and actuality), No. 1: 94–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deng Zhenglai and Sujian Guo 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guangqiu Xu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations