‘The dark bottomless Abyss, that lies under our feet, had yawned open’: The Recision of the Male Melancholic Genius in Carlyle’s Sartor Resartus

  • Felix Sprang

Abstract

The widely accepted assumption that melancholy was an epidemic in early modern England has recently been challenged. As Agnus Gowland has shown, medical records from the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries do not support the notion that melancholy was an epidemic disease (77–80). In general, it is perhaps more appropriate to conceive of melancholy as a metaphorical concept lacking a corresponding physical condition (Bader 20–4). While blood, phlegm and yellow bile were actually known as real matter to Hippocrates, Theoprastus and Galen, no medical authority throughout antiquity and the Renaissance really claimed that he had actually seen black bile. It is perhaps largely owing to this mysterious somatic nature that there was a sustained interest in discussing the melancholic condition. Thus, as Gowland has argued, ‘[i]nstead of asking why people were afflicted with melancholy, we must ask why people described themselves or others as melancholic, and consider what they meant by this’ (83). In his assessment Gowland identifies two main causes for the heightened interest in melancholy during the seventeenth century: first, ‘the increased interest in the occult aspects of natural philosophy and medicine’ (83) and, second, a sustained fascination with ‘religious, moral-philosophical and political discourses on the passions of the soul’ (84).1 If we follow Gowland in his assessment of early modern discourses of melancholia (and I think that his assessment is convincing) and if we agree that melancholy as a discourse still existed in the nineteenth century, it is fruitless to focus on the ‘interest in occult aspects of natural philosophy and medicine’.

Keywords

French Revolution Romantic Period Metaphorical Concept Pure Consciousness Late Sixteenth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

Primary literature

  1. Burton, Robert. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Oxford: John Lichfield and James Short, 1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlyle, Thomas. The French Revolution: A History. Ed. K. J. Fielding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. —. On History. Rpt in Thomas Carlyle. Historical Essays. Ed. Chris R. Vanden Bossche. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. —. Sartor Resartus. Eds Kerry McSweeney and Peter Sabor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. Carus, Carl Gustav. Psyche. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Seele. Pforzheim: Flammer & Hoffmann, 1846.Google Scholar
  6. Sachs, Hans. Gesprech der Philosophia mit eynem melancolischen betrübten jüngling. Augsburg: Philipp Ulhart, 1547. Rpt in ‘Komm, heilige Melancholie’: eine Anthologie deutscher Melancholie-Gedichte; mit Ausblicken auf die europäische Melancholie-Tradition in Literatur- und Kunstgeschichte. Ed. Ludwig Völker. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1983. 286–93.Google Scholar
  7. Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von. ‘Über das Verhältnis der Naturphilosophie zur Philosophie überhaupt’. Schriften von 1801–1804. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1981. 422–40.Google Scholar
  8. Woltmann, Karl Ludwig von. Plan für historische Vorlesungen. Jena: Gabler, 1795.Google Scholar

Secondary literature

  1. Bader, Günter. Melancholie und Metapher: Eine Skizze. Tübingen: Mohr, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, William. Imagery and Ideology: Fiction and Painting in Nineteenth-Century France. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Bermingham, Ann. Landscape and Ideology: The English Rustic Tradition, 1740–1860. London: Thames and Hudson, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. Brook, Andrew. Kant and the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. Claeys, Gregory. The French Revolution Debate in Britain: The Origins of Modern Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, Edwin, and L. S. Jacyna. Nineteenth-Century Origins of Neuroscientific Concepts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. Crafton, Lisa Plummer, ed. The French Revolution Debate in English Literature and Culture. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Crossley, Ceri, and Ian Small, eds. The French Revolution and British Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Cumming, Mark. A Disimprisoned Epic: Form and Vision in Carlyle’s French Revolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. —. ‘History’. The Carlyle Encyclopedia. Ed. Mark Cumming. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2004. 177–81.Google Scholar
  11. Eng, David L. ‘Melancholia in the Late Twentieth Century’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 25.4 (2000): 1275–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Földényi, Läszlo F. ‘Heitere Anblicke, in Melancholie getaucht: Melancholie und Heiterkeit in der Romantik’. Melancholie und Heiterkeit. Ed. Dieter Borchmeyer. Heidelberg: Winter, 2007. 81–105.Google Scholar
  13. Foot, Philippa. ‘Locke, Hume, and Modern Moral Theory: A Legacy of Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Philosophies of Mind’. The Languages of Psyche: Mind and Body in Enlightenment Thought. Ed. George S. Rousseau. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. 81–104.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, Sigmund. ‘Mourning and Melancholia’. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Ed. James Strachey. Vol. 14. London: Hogarth Press, 1957 (1917). 243–58.Google Scholar
  15. Fritzsche, Peter. Stranded in the Present: Modern Time and the Melancholy of History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna. ‘Whose Enlightenment? Medicine, Witchcraft, Melancholia and Pathology’. Medicine in the Enlightenment. Ed. Roy Porter. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995. 113–27.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, William, and Robert G. Ingram, eds. Religious Identities in Britain, 1660–1832. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Gowland, Agnus. ‘The Problem of Early Modern Melancholy’. Past & Present 191 (2006): 77–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haney, Janice L. ‘“Shadow-Hunting”: Romantic Irony, Sartor Resartus, and Victorian Romanticism’. Studies in Romanticism 17.3 (1978): 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huppmann, Gernot. ‘Frühe medizinische Psychologie: Friedrich Gustav Bräunlich (1800–1875)’. Anwendungsfelder der medizinischen Psychologie. Ed. Friedrich Balck. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishizuka, Hiroko. ‘Carlyle’s Nervous Dyspepsia: Nervousness, Indigestion and the Experience of Modernity in Nineteenth-Century Britain’. Neurology and Modernity: A Cultural History of Nervous Systems, 1800–1950. Eds Laura Salisbury and Andrew Shail. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. 81–95.Google Scholar
  22. Jolley, Nicholas. ‘Bodies of Thought: Science, Religion, and the Soul in the Early Enlightenment’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17.4 (2009): 871–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klibansky, Raymond, Erwin Panofsky and Fritz Saxl. Saturn und Melancholie: Studien zur Geschichte der Naturphilosophie und Medizin, der Religion und der Kunst. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. Melman, Billie. The Culture of History: English Uses of the Past, 1800–1953. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  25. Reardon, Bernard M. G. Religion in the Age of Romanticism: Studies in Early Nineteenth Century Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roston, Murray. ‘The Contemplative Mode’. The Romantic Imagination: Literature and Art in England and Germany. Eds Douglas Kelly, Frederick Burwick and Jürgen Klein. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996. 377–97.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, John D. Carlyle and the Burden of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. —. Elegy for an Age: The Presence of the Past in Victorian England. London: Anthem Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  29. Ryan, Vanessa. ‘The Unreliable Editor: Carlyle’s Sartor Resartus and the Art of Biography’. Review of English Studies 54.215 (2003): 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt, Jeremy. Melancholy and the Care of the Soul: Religion, Moral Philosophy and Madness in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
  31. Sprang, Felix. ‘Carlyle and Warburg — the Dynamics of Culture as a “Process of Devastation and Waste”’. Encounter and Experience: Cultures in Process. Eds Ralf Schneider and Stephen Gramley. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag, 2009. 161–9.Google Scholar
  32. Vida, Elizabeth Maximiliana. Romantic Affinities: German Authors and Carlyle; a Study in the History of Ideas. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  33. Weintraub, Stanley. Whistler: A Biography. New York: Weybright and Talley, 1974.Google Scholar
  34. White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Felix Sprang 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Sprang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations