Abstract
Regions are mediated. Often entwined with film and media production, they are constructed across a conflicting range of ideological, economic and cultural forces. There have been many reports on the rise in regional film and media co-productions over the past decade or more. Much has also been made of the convergence of this rise with the ascendancy of a “new Asia” of intensified economic and cultural production. In this analysis, film and media co-production often becomes a sign of new possibilities for the region—the possibilities of new markets, new identities, new networks and even new technologies. Yet co-productions do not only signal desires for the production of this ever-emergent Asia. If regionalism, like globalization, is a “complex, conflicting and indeterminate process,” then the regional co-production is also a window into its conflicts, complexities, and negotiations.1
Keywords
Chinese History Film Industry Film Festival Hollywood Film China MarketPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
- Curtin, Michael (2003), “Media Capital: Towards the Study of Spatial Flows,” International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6: 2, 202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mackintosh, Jonathan D., Chris Berry, and Nicola Liscutin (2009) “Introduction,” Cultural Studies and Cultural Industries in Northeast Asia: What a Difference a Region Makes, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
- Ortner, Sherry B. (2009) “Studying Sideways: Ethnographic Access in Hollywood,” in Vicki Mayer, Miranda J. Banks, John T. Caldwell (eds), Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries, New York: Routledge, 175–89.Google Scholar