Notes Towards Prefigurative Epistemologies

  • Sara C. Motta
Part of the Rethinking International Development Series book series (RID)

Abstract

In a rundown community centre in La Independencia neighbourhood of La Vega shanty town, Caracas, in August 2006, members of Comités de Tierra Urbana (Urban Land Committees, CTUs) came together to develop an analysis of their experiences of participating in the CTU and the successes and barriers they had encountered in their strategy to ‘democratize the city’1. The meeting lasted for two consecutive weekends during which the 20 or so participants began by discussing their history of involvement in the CTUs. These histories were written up and displayed around the room. Facilitators then began discussions orientated towards identifying the major themes that united participants’ experiences in order to develop a strategic orientation and understanding of the CTU project in La Vega. This would also form the basis of a document to be taken by elected participants to a regional level meeting to be held a number of months afterward. The key themes that came out of that meeting were the relationship of the CTUs of La Vega with the Oficina Técnica Nacional para la Regularización de la Tenencia de Tierra Urbana (National Technical Office for the Legalization of Urban Land Ownership, OTN) – the state institution to which the CTUs are attached, especially around the question of the granting of funds to the Campamiento Pionero project of La Vega, the tensions that arise in light of the different demands and logics of CTU members working in the community and those working in the state, the problems in moving from the gaining of individual land title towards democratic control over land and services, and the problems of maintaining community participation in CTU projects

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amsler, S. (2009). “Ethnographies of Critique: Critical Judgement as Cultural Practice’, Paper presented at The Future(s) of Critical Theory Conference, Frankfurt Am Main, 19–21 March.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, D. (2009). The Political Economy of European Social Democracy: A Critical Realist Approach. Ontological Explorations Series (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  3. Barker, C. and Cox, L. (2002). “ “What Have the Romans Ever Done for Us?” Academic and Activist Forms of Movement Theorizing’, Alternative Futures and Popular Protests, 8th Annual Conference, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, April.Google Scholar
  4. Bevington, D. and Dixon, C. (2005). “Movement-Relevant Theory: Rethinking Social Movement Scholarship and Activism’, Social Movement Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhaskar, R. (1975 [1997]). A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd edn (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  6. Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism, 3rd edn (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  7. Bonefeld, W. (1992). “Social Constitution and the Form of the Capitalist State’, in W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn and K. Psychopedis (eds), Open Marxism, Vol.1: Dialectics and History (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar
  8. Bonefeld, W. (2003). ‘Human Practice and Perversion: Beyond Autonomy and Structures’, in W. Bonefeld (ed.), Revolutionary Writing: ‘Common Sense’ Essays in Post-Political Politics (New York: Autonomedia): 73–88.Google Scholar
  9. Charnock, G. (2008). ‘Challenging New State Spatialities: The Open Marxism of Henri Lefebvre’, Manchester Papers in Political Economy, No. 03/08, Centre for International Politics, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  10. CTU (2003). Democratization de la cuidad y transformation urbana (Caracas: Coo- peracion Solidaria Instituto Municipal de Pubicaciones), available at http://www.banap.gov.ve/ctu/ctu.pdf. accessed on 14 February 2010.
  11. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Dinerstein, A. (2003). ‘Que se Vayan Todos! Popular Insurrection and the Asambleas Barriales in Argentina’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Escobar, A. (1992). ‘Imagining a Post-Development Era? Critical Thought, Development and Social Movements’, Social Text, Vol. 31–32, 20–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fedirici, S. (2004). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation (Canada: Autonomia Press).Google Scholar
  15. Fernandes, S. (2008). ‘Barrio Women and Popular Politics in Chavez’s Venezuela’, Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 49, No. 3, 97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. and Deleuze, G. (1977). ‘Intellectuals and Power: A Conversation Between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze’, in D. F. Bouchard (ed.), Language, Counter Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Oxford: Basil Blackwell): 205–17.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, M. (2006). ‘Venezuela’s Urban Land Committees Hold First National Meeting of its Kind’, VenezuelaAnalysis.com, 6 November, http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/2051. accessed on 14 February 2010.
  18. Freire, P. (2000). The Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
  19. Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogia da Autonomia: Saberes necessarios a practica educativa (Sao Paulo: Paz e Terra).Google Scholar
  20. Gilbert, J. (2009). Catching the Knowledge Wave? The Knowledge Society and the Future of Education (New Zealand: NZXER Press).Google Scholar
  21. Holloway, J. (2002a). Change the World Without Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar
  22. Holloway, J. (2002b). ‘Zapatismo and the Social Sciences’, Capital and Class, Vol. 78, 153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacIntyre, A. (1994). The Macintyre. Reader, in Kelvin Knight (ed.) (Cambridge: Polity Press): 223–34.Google Scholar
  24. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminisms Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicising Solidarity (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Motta, S. (2009). ‘Old Tools and New Movements in Latin America: Political Science as Gatekeeper or Intellectual Illuminator’, Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 51, No.1, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruiz, F. (2007). Francisco Wuytack: La Revolution de la Conciencia (Caracas: Ministerio de la Cultura, Fundacion Editorial el Perro y la Rana).Google Scholar
  27. Santos, B. De Sousa (ed.) (2007). Another Knowledge is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  28. Santos, B. De Sousa (2008). ‘Depolarised Pluralities: A Left with a Future’, in P. Barrett, D. Chavez and C. Rodriguez-Garavito (eds), The New Latin American Left: Utopia Reborn (London: Pluto Press): 255–71.Google Scholar
  29. Sayer, A. (1992). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  30. Shukaitis, S. (2009). Imaginal Machines: Autonomy and Self-Organization in the Revolutions ofEveryday Life (London and New York: Minor Compositions, Autonomedia).Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, P. (1993). The Texts of Paulo Freire (Buckingham: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  32. Tischler, S. (2008). ‘The Crisis of the Classical Canon of the Class Form’, in W. Bonefeld (ed.), Subverting the Present: Imagining the Future (New York: Autonomedia): 161–78.Google Scholar
  33. Wacquant, J. D. and Bourdieu, P. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  34. Wainwright, H. (1994). ‘The Theory and Politics of Knowledge’, in H. Wainwright (ed.), Arguments for a New Left: Answering the Free Market Right (Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell): 90–112.Google Scholar
  35. Wainwright, H. (2003). ‘A “Mass of Sense”: Knowledge, Power and Democracy’, in H. Wainwright (ed.), Reclaim the State (London: Verso): 1–29.Google Scholar
  36. Wainwright, H. (2004). ‘New Politics: Principles, Practice and Challenges’, document available from the Transnational Institute, http://www.tni.org/es/archives/act/2367 accessed on 14 February 2010.
  37. Wainwright, H. (2005). ‘Why Participatory Democracy Matters - and Movements Matter to Participatory Democracy’, document available from the Transnational Institute, http://www.tni.org/archives/archives_wainwright_matter accessed on 14 February 2010.
  38. Wainwright, H. (2009). ‘Positively Public QED’, in H. Wainwright with M. Little (eds), Public Service Reform, But Not as We Know It! How Democracy Can Transform Public Services (Newcastle: Compass and UNISON): 167–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara C. Motta

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations