Advertisement

Refugees or Migrants? The UNHCR’s Comprehensive Approach to Afghan Mobility into Iran and Pakistan

  • Giulia Scalettaris
Part of the Migration, Minorities and Citizenship book series (MMC)

Abstract

Labelling constitutes an inescapable part of public policy-making (Wood, 1985; Zetter, 1991, p. 44), which entails identifying standardized categories of people in order to define those who can reap the benefits of rights and entitlements. By defining groups of clients and spheres of competence, this operation of classification contributes to organizing public policy. The current international framework addressing international mobility is based on the distinction between ‘refugees’ and ‘migrants’. What theoretically distinguishes refugees from migrants is the cause of departure: forced in the case of refugees (such as persecution and conflict), voluntary in the case of migrants (such as economic reasons). International migration and asylum are currently considered as separate international policy areas. This is reflected in the institutional separation between those institutions responsible for refugees and those for migrants. While there is a consolidated international regime to protect refugees, based on the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugee (hereafter the 1951 Geneva Convention) and the existence of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), there is no such regime for other categories of migrants, nor is there international consensus about the responsibility of states for responding to migration.1

Keywords

Labour Migration Global Governance Evaluation Unit Geneva Convention Status Attribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Abbasi-Shavazi, M., Glazebrook, D., Jamshidiha, G., Mahmoudian, H., Sadeghi, R. (2005) Return to Afghanistan?: a study of Afghans living in Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul.Google Scholar
  2. Abbasi-Shavazi, M., Glazebrook, D. (2006) Continued Protection, Sustainable reintegration: Afghan refugees and Migrants in Iran. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul.Google Scholar
  3. Adelkhah, F., Olszewska, Z. (2007) ‘The Iranian Afghans’, Iranian Studies 40(2).Google Scholar
  4. Altai Consulting (2006) Integration of Returnees in the Afghan Labor Market. Kabul, October 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Bakewell, O. (2000) ‘Repatriation and Self-Settled Refugees in Zambia: Bringing Solutions to the Wrong Problems’, Journal of Refugee Studies 13(4): 356–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centlivres, P. (1988) ‘Les trois pôles de l’identité afghane au Pakistan’, L’Homme 28(4): 134–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collective for Social Science Research (2006) Afghans in Pakistan: Broadening the Focus. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, D. B. (1986) ‘Marginality and Migration: Cultural Dimensions of the Afghan Refugee Problem’, International Migration Review 20(2): 313–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fielden, M. B. (1998) ‘The Geopolitics of Aid: The Provision and Termination of Aid to Afghan Refugees in the North West Frontier Province, Pakistan’, Political Geography 17(4): 459–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghosh, B. (1995) ‘Movements of People: the Search for a New International Regime’, Issues in Global Governance. Papers written for the Commission on Global Governance, Kluwer Law International, pp. 405–24.Google Scholar
  11. Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2002) Closed Door Policy: Afghan Refugees in Pakistan and Iran. 14(2(G)), http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/pakistan/Google Scholar
  12. Karatani, R. (2005) ‘How History Separated Refugee and Migrant Regimes: In Search of Their Institutional Origins’, International Journal of Refugee Law 17(3).Google Scholar
  13. Macleod, E. (2008) ‘Afghan Refugees in Iran and Pakistan’, in Loesher, G., Milner, J., Newman, E., Troeller, G. (eds) Protracted Refugee Situations: Political, Human Rights and Security Implications. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Monsutti, A. (2005) War and Migration. Social Networks and Economic Strategies of the Hazaras of Afghanistan, Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  15. Monsutti, A. (2007) ‘Afghan Migratory Strategies and the Three Solutions to the Refugee Problem’, Refugee Survey Quarterly 27(1): 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monsutti, A. (2009) ‘Itinérances transnationales: un éclairage sur les réseaux migratoires afghans’, Critique Internationale 44.Google Scholar
  17. Rajee, B. (2000) ‘The Politics of Refugee Policy in Post-Revolutionary Iran’, Middle East Journal 54(1): 44–63.Google Scholar
  18. Richmond, A. (1988) ‘Sociological Theories of International Migration : The Case of Refugees’, Current Sociology 36(7).Google Scholar
  19. Ruiz, H. (2002) ‘Afghanistan: Conflict and Displacement 1978 to 2001’, Forced Migration Review 13.Google Scholar
  20. Saiko, M. (2007) Second-Generation Afghans in Neighbouring Countries. From mohajer to hamwatan: Afghans return home. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul.Google Scholar
  21. Schoech, R. (2008) Afghan refugees in Pakistan during the 1980s: Cold War politics and registration practice. New Issues in Refugee Research, 157, UNHCR, Geneva.Google Scholar
  22. Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) (2006) Report on Stakeholder Consultations on the Future of Afghan Refugees in Pakistan. Islamabad, September 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Stigter, E., Monsutti, A. (2005) Transnational Networks: Recognising a Regional Reality. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul.Google Scholar
  24. Turton, D. (2003) Refugees, forced resettlers and ‘other forced migrants’: towards a unitary study of forced migration. Working Paper 94, New Issues in Refugee Research, UNHCR, Geneva.Google Scholar
  25. Turton, D., Marsden, P. (2002) Taking Refugees for a Ride? The Politics of Refugees Return in Afghanistan. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul.Google Scholar
  26. UNHCR (2003) Towards A Comprehensive Solution for Displacement from Afghanistan. Discussion Paper. UNHCR, Geneva.Google Scholar
  27. UNHCR (2004) Afghanistan. Challenges to Return, UNHCR: Geneva.Google Scholar
  28. UNHCR (2007) Finding Durable Solutions for Refugees and Displacement. Paper for the Afghanistan Development Forum.Google Scholar
  29. United States Committee for Refugees (USCR) (2001) Afghan Refugees Shunned and Scorned, Washington, DC: USCR.Google Scholar
  30. Wickramasekara, P., et al. (2006) Afghan Households in Iran: Profile and Impact. ILO/UNHCR, Geneva, http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/migrant/download/iranjeport.pdfGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood, G. (ed.) (1985) ‘The Politics of Development Policy Labelling’. Wood Geof (ed.) Labelling in Development Policy, London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Zetter, R. (1991) ‘Labelling Refugees: Forming and Transforming a Bureaucratic Identity’, Journal of Refugee Studies 4(1).Google Scholar
  33. Zieck, M. (2008) ‘The Legal Status of Afghan Refugees in Pakistan, a Story of Eight Agreements and Two Suppressed Premises’, International Journal of Refugee Law 20(2): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Giulia Scalettaris 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Scalettaris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations