Minsky Moments, Russell Chickens and Grey Swans: The Methodological Puzzles of Financial Instability Analysis

  • Alessandro Vercelli
Chapter

Abstract

Although Minsky’s FIH has been discussed and extended by many scholars since its inception, it is not yet a full-fledged theory as a precise specification of the relationship between some of the crucial variables is still missing or remains largely implicit (a critical survey of much of the literature may be found in Tymoigne, 2006). For that reason Minsky has been often accused of ‘implicit theorising’ (see in particular Tobin, 1989). In this view the theoretical axioms are not clearly spelled out and their implications for explanation and prediction are insufficiently argued (Toporowski, 2005, 2008). For that reason most academic economists dismissed the FIH, although a few high-level practitioners continued to consider it quite relevant for their choices. In our opinion this is a non sequitur. We have to take seriously the criticism of implicit theorising but from it we should draw conclusions quite different from those of many Minsky’s critics. Implicit theorising is typical of new revolutionary theories (in the sense of Kuhn, 1970).

Keywords

Business Cycle Implicit Theorise Structural Instability Micro Model Economic Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arestis, P. and M. Glickman (2002) ‘Financial crisis in Southeast Asia: dispelling illusion the Minskyan way’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 26.Google Scholar
  2. Bernanke, B.S. (2004) ‘The great moderation’, Remarks by Governor B.S. Bernanke at the Meeting of the Eastern Economic Association, 20th February, Federal Reserve, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  3. Clarida, R., J. Gali and M. Gertler (1999) ‘The science of monetary policy: a New Keynesian perspective’, Journal ofEconomic Literature, vol. 37: 4.Google Scholar
  4. Desai, M. (1973) ‘Growth cycles and inflation in a model of the class struggle’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 6.Google Scholar
  5. Dieci, R., S. Sordi and A. Vercelli (2006) ‘Financial fragility and global dynamics’, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 29: 3.Google Scholar
  6. Gandolfo, G. (1997) Economic Dynamics–Study Edition, 3rd edn ( Berlin: Springer Verlag).Google Scholar
  7. Goldsmith, R.W. (1982) ‘Comment’ in C.P. Kindleberger and J.P. Laffargue (eds)Financial Crises: Theory, History, Policy ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Goodwin, R. (1967) ‘A growth cycle’ in C.H. Feinstein (ed.) Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).Google Scholar
  9. Hawking, S.W. and R. Penrose (1970) ‘The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology’ in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 314.Google Scholar
  10. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn ( Chicago: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Kydland, F.E. and E.C. Prescott (1982) ‘Time to build and aggregate fluctuations’, Econometrica, vol. 50.Google Scholar
  12. Lucas, R.E. (1981) Studies in Business in Business Cycle Theory ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  13. Minsky, H.P. (1964) ‘Financial crisis, financial system and the performance of the economy’ in Commission on Money and Credit (Englewood Cliffs: Private Capital Markets, Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  14. Minsky, H.P. (1975) John Maynard Keynes ( New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Minsky, H.P. (1982) Can ‘It’ Happen Again? Essays on Instability and Finance ( New York: Sharp).Google Scholar
  16. Minsky, H.P. (1986) Stabilizing an Unstable Economy ( New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Oppenheimer J.R. and G.M. Volkoff (1939) ‘On massive neutron cores’, Physical Review, vol. 55.Google Scholar
  18. Russell, B. (1912) The Problems of Philosophy ( London: Williams and Norgate).Google Scholar
  19. Sordi, S. and A. Vercelli (2006) ‘Financial fragility and economic fluctuations’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, vol. 61: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schumpeter, J.A. (1954) A History of Economic Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press) reprinted by Allen and Unwin, London, 1982.Google Scholar
  21. Tobin, J. (1989) ‘Book review of “Stabilizing an Unstable Economy” by Hyman P. Minsky’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 27.Google Scholar
  22. Toporowski, J. (2005) Theories of Financial Disturbance ( Cheltenham: Elgar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Toporowski, J. (2008) ‘Minsky’s “induced investment and business cycles”’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 32.Google Scholar
  24. Tymoigne, E. (2006) ‘The Minskyan system’, Part 1, 2, and 3, Working papers Nº,452, 453, 455 The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.Google Scholar
  25. Veneziani, R. and Mohun, S. (2006) ‘Structural stability and Goodwin’s growth cycle’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 17: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vercelli, A. (1983) ‘Is instability enough to discredit a model?’ in Proceedings of the seminar on non-linear theory of fluctuating growth, Economic Notes, vol. 3.Google Scholar
  27. Vercelli, A. (1991) Methodological Foundations of Macroeconomics. Keynes and Lucas ( Cambridge: Cambridge University).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vercelli, A. (2000) ‘Financial fragility and cyclical fluctuations’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  29. Vercelli, A. (2001) ‘Minsky, Keynes and the structural instability of a sophisticated monetary economy’, in R. Bellofiore and P. Ferri (eds) Financial Fragility and Investment in the Capitalist Economy ( Cheltenham: Elgar ).Google Scholar
  30. Vercelli, A. (2005) ‘Rationality, learning and complexity’, in B. Agarwal and A. Vercelli (eds) Psychology, Rationality and Economic Behaviour: Challenging Standard Assumptions ( London: Palgrave Macmillan ).Google Scholar
  31. Vercelli, A. (2009) ‘A perspective on Minsky Moments: The core of the Financial Instability Hypothesis in light of the subprime crisis’, Levy Working Paper, n. 579, The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-On-Hudson, 2009, forthcoming in Review of Political Economy.Google Scholar
  32. Woodford, M. (2003) Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy ( Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Vercelli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations