Advertisement

Polyarchy as an alternative

  • David Courpasson
  • Jean-Claude Thoenig

Abstract

Manager rebellion can be seen in another light by analyzing the company in terms of a political regime, in which power is held temporarily, is contingent on issues that are debated, decisions that are made and consequences of actions that have been taken, and which is a scarce resource distributed unequally between individuals, groups and units who compete with one another.1

Keywords

Senior Management Private Life Middle Manager Political Regime Joint Regulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    S. R. Clegg, D. Courpasson and N. Philips, Power and organization, London, Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. G. March, The business firm as a political coalition, Journal of politics, 24: 662–78, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.S. Tannenbaum, Control and effectiveness in a voluntary organization, American journal of sociology, (67) 1, July 1961.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. A. Dahl, A preface to democratic theory, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Mouffe, The democratic paradox, London, Verso, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Ciborra, The knowledge creating company, Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. G. March, Decisions and organizations, Oxford, Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. D. Reynaud, Les Règles du jeu: L’action collective et la régulation sociale, Paris, Armand Colin, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. De Terssac, L’autonomie au travail, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Semler, Maverick: The success story behind the world’s most unusual workplace, New York, Warner Books, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. C. Thoenig and C. Waldman, The marking enterprise: Business success and societal impact, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. E. Meyerson and M. A. Scully, Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change, Organization science, 6 (5): 585–600, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. K. Merton, Sociological ambivalence and other essays, New York, Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Courpasson & Jean-Claude Thoenig 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Courpasson
    • 1
  • Jean-Claude Thoenig
    • 2
  1. 1.EMLYON Business SchoolFrance
  2. 2.University Paris-Dauphine and CNRS, INSEADFrance

Personalised recommendations