Forging a New India in a Telegraph World: Expansion and Consolidation within India

  • Deep Kanta Lahiri Choudhury
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series book series (PMSTH)

Abstract

Between 1860 and 1900, the Indian Empire emerged as a crucial strategic element in both the cable and overland telegraph networks of the British Empire. By 1875 India was the main overland link between the West, and the Far East and Australasia. However, less than 70 years later, by 1931, the Indo-European Telegraph Department was desperately trying to liquidate its holdings as it wound up operations. This book examines these 70 years in the context of the imperial telegraph system. By 1874, two main overland lines serviced the connection with India. The first was the Turkish route that went from Constantinople through Diarbekr and Baghdad to Fao. The second was the line run by the Siemens’ Indo-European Telegraph Company, from Berlin through Russian Odessa and north of the Black Sea to Tabriz and Tehran. Fao was connected by submarine cable to Bushehr where it met the overland line from Tehran via Isfahan and Shiraz: both these lines were under the management of the Indo-European Telegraph Department of the Government of India. From Bushehr, submarine cables passed via Henjam and Masandam, and Gwadar, further east on the Persian coast, to Karachi. The Eastern Company’s submarine cables dropped around the coast of Portugal to touch at Gibraltar, from where they passed via Malta and Alexandria and Cairo through the Suez to Aden, and from there to Bombay.

Keywords

British Government Colonial State Submarine Cable Channel Cable Eastern Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 19.
    Cf., for details about Scudamore and the nationalisation scheme, Alan Clinton, Post Office Workers: A Trade Union and Social History London: Allen and Unwin, 1984; C.R. Perry, The Victorian Post Office: The Growth of a Bureaucracy Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 42.
    N. Gerald Barrier, Banned: Controversial Literature and Political Control in British India, 1907–1947 Delhi: Manohar, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 44.
    R.T.F. Kirk, Paper Making in the Bombay Presidency: A Monograph Bombay: Official Publications, 1908Google Scholar
  4. D.N. Mookerjee, Paper and Papier-mache in Bengal: A Monograph Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Book Department, 1908. MSA. Perhaps, these reports reflected the anxiety of the Government to control the material means of circulation and printing during the panic of 1907–8.Google Scholar
  5. 46.
    George Pottinger, Mayo: Disraeli’s Viceroy Great Britain: Michael Russell, 1990, pp. 186–8; Owen Tudor Burne alleged that the convict had received letters from ‘the Patna malcontents, inciting him to commit the deed’, fn 10. O.T. Burne, Letters on the Indian Administration of the Earl of Mayo printed for ‘private research’ at the Private Secretary’s Office Press, Simla, 1877. Copy in OIOC, Mss EUR D951/17.Google Scholar
  6. 52.
    Antonin Artaud, The Theatre and its Double: Essays by Antonin Artaud Montreuil; London: Calder, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 53.
    Lady Betty Balfour (ed.), Personal and Literary Letters of Robert, First Earl of Lytton 2 vols, vol. II, London: Longman’s Green and Company, 1906, pp. 185–6; Lord Lytton to the Queen, Calcutta, 19 December 1879.Google Scholar
  8. 64.
    David Gilmour, Curzon London: Papermac, 1995, pp. 89, 167.Google Scholar
  9. 65.
    Denis Judd, Empire: The British Imperial Experience from 1765 to the Present London: Harper Collins, 1996, p. 325.Google Scholar
  10. 69.
    B.L. Putnam Weale, Indiscreet Letters from Peking London: Hurst and Blackett, 1906, pp. 203–4; cf. Bayly, ‘Informing Empire’.Google Scholar
  11. 70.
    K.C. Baglehole, A Century of Service: A Brief History of Cable and Wireless Ltd. 1868–1968 London: Cable and Wireless Ltd., 1970, p. 11.Google Scholar
  12. 75.
    R.J. Moore, ‘Curzon and Indian Reform’, Modern Asian Studies vol. 27 (4), October 1993, pp. 719–40; Edwin Montagu, 20 December 1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 82.
    Stephen P. Cohen, ‘Issue, Role, and Personality: The Kitchener-Curzon Dispute’, Comparative Studies in Society and History vol. 10 (3), April 1968, pp. 337–55; Gilmour, Curzon pp. 290–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 86.
    David Dilks, Curzon in India vol. I, London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1969, pp. 221, 224.Google Scholar
  15. 106.
    A.J. Field, The Magnetic Telegraph, Price and Quantity Data, and the New Management of Capital’, The Journal of Economic History vol. 52 (3) June 1992, pp. 401–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 108.
    For a discussion of the main perspectives on time see Alfred Gell, The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images Oxford: Berg, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 113.
    Cf. Leonard Waldo, The Distribution of Time’, Science vol. I (23) 4 December 1880, pp. 277–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 126.
    Minto Papers, letters and telegrams, vol. I, no.166, Minto to A.H.L. Fraser, 8 June 1907; M.N. Das, India under Morley and Minto London: G. Allen and Unwin, 1964, p. 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deep Kanta Lahiri Choudhury 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deep Kanta Lahiri Choudhury
    • 1
  1. 1.Visva Bharati UniversityShantiniketanIndia

Personalised recommendations