From the Active to the Enabling State pp 63-80 | Cite as
From Incremental to Copernican Reform?: Changes to the Position and Role of Senior Civil Servants in the Belgian Federal Administration
Abstract
In contrast with their colleagues in several other countries, senior civil servants in Belgium have never really fitted into the picture of a socially and politically distinctive elite (Brans and Hondeghem 1999). Even more striking, however, is the observation that the position and policy role of the senior civil service in the 1990s appears to have changed little in three decades. Moreover the diagnosis of the problems of Belgian administration and the remedies put forward in the 1960s seem to have persisted into the 1990s. So has there been no change at all? From the 1960s to the 1990s we have in fact witnessed some major changes in the broader social and political environment in which the public service operates, as well as modernisation efforts within the public service. It took until the beginning of the 21st century, however, for a major reform programme to materialise. What was labelled a ‘Copernican reform’ would indeed radically impact upon the status and role of senior officials. This chapter first compares the role of senior civil servants over a period of three decades. It then points out pressures for change in the 1980s and 1990s, as well as the obstacles that seemed to have delayed reform, or encumbered attempts to alter the position of senior civil servants. The article ends with an overview and assessment of the recent Copernicus reform.
Keywords
Civil Servant Policy Advice Senior Official Ministerial Cabinet State ReformPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Aberbach, J.D., Putnam, R.D. and Rockman, B.A. (1981) Bureaucrats & Politicians in Western Democracies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Brans, M. and Hondeghem, A. (1999) ‘The senior civil service in Belgium’, in Page, E.C. and V. Wright (eds.), Bureaucratic Élites in Western European States, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 120–46.Google Scholar
- Brans, M., Hoet, D. and Pelgrims, C. (2002) ‘Abolishing ministerial cabinets for reinventing them. Comparative observations on political control and professional policy advice’, paper presented at the Van Ryper Symposium, American Society for Public Administration Conference, Marsh, Phoenix.Google Scholar
- Brans, M., Pelgrims, C. and Hoet, D. (2002) ‘Professional Policy-making and Politico-administrative relations in Belgium’, paper presented at the Nispacee Conference, April, Krakau.Google Scholar
- Clark, David (1998) ‘The modernization of the French civil service: crisis, change and continuity’, in Public Administration, 76(1), pp. 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crozier, M. (1963) Le phénomène bureaucratique, Paris, Ed. du Seuil.Google Scholar
- Depré, R. (1973) ‘De topambtenaren van de ministeries in België: een bestuurssoci-ologisch explorerend onderzoek’, Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
- Derlien, H.-U. (1996) ‘The politicization of bureaucracies in historical and comparative perspective’, in Peters, B. Guy and Rockman, Bert A. (eds), Agenda for Excellence. Administering the State, Chatham House Publishers, Chatham, pp. 149–62.Google Scholar
- Derlien, H.-U. (2003) ‘Mandarins or managers?: the administrative elite in Bonn, 1970–1987 and beyond’, in Governance, (16) 3: 401–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dewachter, W. (1973) ‘La hiérarchie du pouvoir dans la politique belge’, in Res Publica, 2, pp. 279–90.Google Scholar
- Dewachter, W. and Das, E. (1991) Politiek in België: Geprofileerde machtsverhoudingen, Acco, Leuven.Google Scholar
- Dewinter, L. et al. (1996) ‘Comparing similar countries: Italy and Belgium’, Res Publica, (Special issue on Partitocracies between crises and reform: the cases of Italy and Belgium) (38), 215–33.Google Scholar
- Dierickx, G. and Majersdorf, P. (1993) De politieke cultuur van ambtenaren en politici in België, Vandenbroele, Brugge, 1993.Google Scholar
- Dierickx, G. (1996) Logica van de politiek, Leuven, Garant.Google Scholar
- Hondeghem, A. (1990) De loopbaan van de ambtenaar: Tussen droom en werkelijkheid, VCOB, Leuven.Google Scholar
- Hondeghem, A. (1998) ‘La politisation de l’administration en Belgique: vers une nouvelle culture?’, in: Revue Française d’Administration Publique, 86, April-June, pp. 255–66.Google Scholar
- Hondeghem, A. (2000) ‘The national Civil Service in Belgium’, in Bekke, H.J.G.M., Van der Meer, F. (eds), Civil Service Systems in Western Europe, Edward Elgar, pp. 120–8.Google Scholar
- Hondeghem, A. and Steen, T. (2000) ‘The Belgian public services: can regulations go along with flexible personnel arrangements?’, in Farnham, D., Horton, S. (eds), Human Resources Flexibilities in the public Services: International Perspectives, Macmillan Business, pp. 61–79.Google Scholar
- Hood, Ch. (1991) ‘A public management for all seasons?’, in Public Administration, 69, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hood, C.C. (2001) ‘Public service bargains and public service reform?’, in Peters, B.G. and J. Pierre (eds) Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London, Routledge, 13–23.Google Scholar
- Knack: 32(December 2002)50: 20–4.Google Scholar
- La Libre Belgique (1996) 26 December.Google Scholar
- Luyckx, T. and Platel, M. (1985) Politieke geschiedenis van België: Deel 1. Antwerpen, Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Maesschalck, J. (2002) ‘When do scandals have an impact on policy making?: a case study of the police reform following the Dutroux scandal in Belgium’, in International Public Management Journal, 2002 (5), 2: 169–93.Google Scholar
- Ministerie van Ambtenarenzaken (2001) Overzicht personeelssterkte in de overheidssector, Brussel.Google Scholar
- Pelgrims, C. (2001) Ministeriële kabinetsleden en hun loopbaan: Tussen mythe en realiteit, Brugge, Die Keure.Google Scholar
- Pelgrims, C. (2005) ‘Sisyfusarbeid bij de afschaffing van de kabinetten’, in Hondeghem, A. and R. Depré (eds), De Copernicushervorming in Perspectief: Veranderingsmanagement in de Federale Overheid. Brugge, Vandenbroele, 153–76.Google Scholar
- Pelgrims, C. and S. Dereu (2006) ‘Ministeriële Kabinetten in de Copernicushervorming. De terugkeer van iets dat nooit weg was’, Burger bestuur & beleid, (3)1 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Peters, G. (1987) ‘Politicians and bureaucrats in the Politics of policy-making’, in Lane, J.-E. (ed.), Bureaucracy and Public Choice. Bristol, Sage, 256–82.Google Scholar
- Staes, Patrick and Legrand, Jean-Jacques: (1998) Het handvest van de gebruiker van de openbare diensten, Federaal Ministerie van Ambtenarenzaken/Labor, Brussel.Google Scholar
- Suetens, M. and Walgrave, S. (2001) ‘Belgian politics without ministerial cabinets?: on the possibilities and limitations of a New Political Culture’, in Acta Politica, 2: 285–305.Google Scholar
- Toonen, T.A.J. (2001) ‘The comparative dimension of administrative reform: creating open villages and redesigning the politics of administration’, in Peters, G.B. and Pierre, J. (eds), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. New York, Routledge, 183–201.Google Scholar
- Vancoppenolle, D. & Legrain, A. (2003) ‘Lignes de rupture dans la Nouvelle Gestion Publique en Belgique?: Développements sub-nationaux: Divergences ou convergences?’, article in preparation.Google Scholar
- Van de Voorde, A. (1996) ‘De federale ambtenaar’, in Gisteren, Vandaag and morgen (eds), Documentatieblad Ministerie van Financiën, België, 56 (5), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
- Van Hassel, H. (1975) ‘Regering en ambtenarij ten aanzien van de beleidsbe-heersing in België’, in Acta Politica, July, 302–24.Google Scholar
- Wright, V. (1994) ‘Reshaping the State: the implications for public administration’, in West European politics, 17, pp. 102–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar