The Ideology of Peace: Peacebuilding and the War in Iraq

  • Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen
Part of the Palgrave Advances book series (PAD)

Abstract

There is a tendency to reduce peacebuilding, in theory as well as in practice, to a technocratic question. Academics and policymakers in Western capitals, as well as military officers and aid workers from Liberia to Afghanistan, ask themselves how to make a durable peace. The question of ‘how to make peace?’ is the subject of endless number of books and articles, as well as manuals and consultancy reports, that try to describe the best techniques for making peace. However, this focus on how to make peace might have turned our attention away from what kind of peace is actually being made. Perhaps, and this is more troubling, this inattention to the nature of the peace which one strives to achieve is the reason why peace all too often remains unattainable, as well as the reason why the price other people pay for the schemes of the academics, policymakers, officers and aid workers is at times so terribly high.

Keywords

Security Council Nobel Lecture Cluster Bomb Lasting Peace Iraqi Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    I. Kant, ‘To Perpetual Peace. A Philosophical Sketch’, in H. Reiss (ed.) Kant’s Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, p. 93. See also Kant’s ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose’, in Kant’s Political Writings, ed. by Hans Reiss and trans. by H.B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.V. Rasmussen, The West, Civil Society and the Construction of Peace, London: Palgrave, 2003, pp. 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays, New York: Basic Book, 1973, p. 218.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    M. Howard, The Invention of Peace, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    C. Coker, Humane Warfare, London: Routledge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 11.
    J. MacMillan, On Liberal Peace. Democracy, War and the International Order, London: Tauris Academic Studies, 1998, p. x.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    A. Swidler, ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 51, 1986, p. 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 15.
    E. Luttwak, On the Meaning of Victory, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986, p. 289.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    Quoted in J. Black, War in the New Century, London: Continuum, 2001, p. 2.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    H. Pinter, Art, Truth and Politics, Nobel Lecture, 7 December, Stockholm: The Nobel Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    T. Ali, ‘Re-Colonizing Iraq’, New Left Review, May–June 2003, p. 21.Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    After the invasion Susan Watkins kept the World War II metaphor going by referring to the Iraqi government installed by the US in 2004 as the ‘Vichy on the Tigris’. Watkins argued that anyone who opposes US hegemony should support the ‘the Iraqi maquis’. S. Watkins, ‘Vichy on the Tigris’, New Left Review, July–August 2004, p. 17.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    G.W.F. Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. by Allen W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, p. 361.Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    H. Kahn, W. Pfaff and E. Stillman, War Termination: Issues and Concepts, Croton-on-Harmon, NY: The Hudson Institute, 1968, p. 63.Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    M. Kaldor, ‘From Just War to Just Peace’, pp. 255–73, in C. Reed and D. Ryall (eds), The Price of Peace. Just War in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 269.Google Scholar
  16. 24.
    T. Blair, Victory for Democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan is Vital if Global Terrorism is to be Defeated, to The Foreign Policy Centre in association with Reuters, 21 March 2006, London: Office of the Prime Minister, §54.Google Scholar
  17. 25.
    A. Al-Zawairi, Letter to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, English translation 12 December 2005, posted at www.weeklystandard.com, accessed 12 April 2006, §10–25.Google Scholar
  18. 27.
    R.H. Solomon, ‘Foreword’, in J. Covey, M.J. Dziedzic and L.R. Hawley, The Quest for Viable Peace. International Intervention and Strategies for Conflict Transformation, Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, 2005, p. xi.Google Scholar
  19. 30.
    G.W. Bush, President Discusses Iraqi Elections, Victory in the War on Terror, 14 December 2005, The Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington, DC: The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, §45.Google Scholar
  20. 31.
    R.B. Killebew, ‘Winning Wars’, Army, 55, 2005, p. 27.Google Scholar
  21. 32.
    National Security Council, National Strategy for Victory in Iraq, November 2005, Washington, DC: The White House, p. 3.Google Scholar
  22. 34.
    J. Lieberman, ‘Our Troops Must Stay’, Wall Street Journal, 29 November 2005.Google Scholar
  23. 36.
    S. Hadley, Victory in Iraq, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, 20 December 2005, §33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations