The Challenges of Ethno-Nationalism pp 193-210 | Cite as
The Effectiveness of Federal Responses to Ethnic Conflict
Chapter
Abstract
There was a time when the ideal of the multinational state seemed to many to be a valuable end in itself. As Lord Acton put it in a celebrated essay, ‘the coexistence of several nations under the same state is… one of the chief instruments of civilisation’. It represented, he argued, ‘a state of greater advancement than the national unity which is the ideal of modern liberalism.’1
Keywords
Federal State Comparative International Development Unitary State Autonomous Community Federal System
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 2.John Coakley, ‘The Resolution of Ethnic Conflict: Towards a Typology’, International Political Science Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1992, pp. 341–56;Google Scholar
- John McGarry and Brendan O’Leary, ‘Introduction: The Macro-Political Regulation of Ethnic Conflict’, in John McGarry and Brendan O’Leary (eds), The Politics of Ethnic Conflict Regulation: Case Studies of Protracted Ethnic Conflicts, London: Routledge, 1993, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
- 3.This point is developed further in John Coakley, ‘Conclusion: Towards a Solution?’ in John Coakley (ed.), The Territorial Management of Ethnic Conflict ( 2nd edition ), London: Frank Cass, 2003, pp. 293–316.Google Scholar
- 4.For early general but still very useful descriptions of federalism and federation, see K. C. Wheare (1963) Federal Government (4th edition), London: Oxford University Press, 1963 [first published 1946 ];Google Scholar
- Carl J. Friedrich, Trends of Federalism in Theory and Practice, London: Pall Mall Press, 1968;Google Scholar
- Ivo D. Duchacek, Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics, New York, NY: Holt,Rinehart and Winston, 1970Google Scholar
- Murray Forsyth (ed.), Federalism and Nationalism, London: Leicester University Press, 1989;Google Scholar
- Michael Burgess and Alain-G. Gagnon (eds), Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993;Google Scholar
- Bertus de Villiers (ed.), Evaluating Federal Systems, Cape Town: Juta and Co.1994;Google Scholar
- Wilfried Swenden, Federalism and Regionalism in Western Europe: A Comparative and Thematic Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomas O. Hueglin and Alan Fenna, Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry, Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2006;Google Scholar
- Michael Burgess and John Pinder (eds), Multinational Federations, New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
- 5.see Dag Anckar, ‘Lilliput Federalism: Profiles and Varieties’, Regional and Federal Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2003, pp. 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A.-P. Frognier, ‘Federal and Partly Federal Systems, Institutions and Conflict Managements: Some Western European Examples’, in Desmond Rea (ed.), Political Co-operation in Divided Societies: A Series of Papers Relevant to the Conflict in Northern Ireland, Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1982, pp. 187–228;Google Scholar
- Ann L. Griffiths and Karl Nerenberg (eds), Handbook of Federal Countries, 2002, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002;Google Scholar
- 7.see Michael Burgess, ‘Federalism and Federation: A Reappraisal’ in Burgess and Gagnon, 1993, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
- 8.Ivo D. Duchacek, The Territorial Dimension of Politics Within, Among and Across Nations, Boulder, CO: Westview, 1986, pp. 112–18.Google Scholar
- 9.Jan-Erik Lane and Svante Ersson, Politics and Society in Western Europe ( 4th edition ), London: Sage, 1999, p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks and Arjan H. Schakel, ‘Operationalising Regional Authority: A Coding Scheme for 42 Countries, 1950–2006’, Regional and Federal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2–3, 2008, pp. 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Gary Marks, Liesbet Hooghe and Arjan H. Schakel, ‘Measuring Regional Authority’, Regional and Federal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2–3, 2008, pp. 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Arend Lijphart, Democracies: Patterns ofMajoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984, p. 178.Google Scholar
- 14.For an overview of such indices, see Arjan H. Schakel, ‘Validation of the Regional Authority Index’, Regional and Federal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2–3, 2008, pp. 143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Aaron Schneider, ‘Decentralisation: Conceptualisation and Measurement’, Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2003, pp. 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.See Louise Tillin, ‘United in Diversity? Asymmetry in Indian Federalism’, Publius: The Journal ofFederalism, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2007, pp. 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Yonatan Fesha and Coel Kirkby, ‘A Critical Survey of Subnational Autonomy in African States’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2008, pp. 248–71, at p. 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.See Brendan O’Leary, ‘Analysing Partition: Definition, Classification and Explanation’, Political Geography, Vol. 26, No. 8, 2007, pp. 886–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Dawn Brancati, ‘Decentralization: Fueling the Fire of Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?’ International Organization, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2006, pp. 651–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Nancy Bermeo, ‘A New Look at Federalism: The Import of Institutions’, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 96–110, at p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Henry E. Hale, ‘Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse’, International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2004, pp. 165–93.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© John Coakley 2010