A Note on Menger’s Problem Situation and Non-essentialist Approach to Economics

  • Karl Milford
Chapter

Abstract

Philosophical interpretations of Menger’s approach to economics can be divided into two groups: one considering his approach from a more ‘technical’ point of view; and one considering possible philosophical influences on his position. Authors belonging to the first group consider questions such as whether Menger regards inductivist or deductivist techniques as primarily appropriate for economics (Schmoller, 1883; Keynes, 1891; Kerschagl, 1925). Authors belonging to the second group try to establish the influence of specific philosophical theories upon Menger’s economic theories and methodological positions. They suggest that Menger’s economic theories and methodological positions reflect influences of the philosophy of Kant (Dobretsberger, 1949) or opine that they reflect principles of rationalism and intellectualism, such as represented by the philosophy of Wolf (Boos, 1986). But the most prominent group among those interpretations asserts that Menger defends an Aristotelian essentialist position. It also seems that this interpretation has become a kind of standard interpretation of his economic, philosophical and epistemological positions (Kauder, 1958, 1962; Hutchison, 1973; Alter, 1990; Smith, 1990; Campagnolo, 2008).

Keywords

Subjective Evaluation Physical Object Social Institution Problem Situation Price Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alter, M. (1990) Carl Menger and the Origins of Economics, San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boos, M. (1986) Die Wissenschaftstheorie Carl Mengers, Wien: Böhlaus Nachf.Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell, B. J. (ed.) (1990) Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics, Durham, N.C.: DukeUniversityPress.Google Scholar
  4. Campagnolo, G. (ed.) (2008) Carl Menger, Discussed on the Basis of New Findings, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  5. Dobretsberger, J. (1949) ‘Zur Methodenlehre C. Mengers und der österreichischen Schule’, in Neue Beiträge zur Wirtschaftstheorie. Festschrift anläßlich des 70. Geburtstages von H. Mayer,Wien.Google Scholar
  6. Hildebrand, B. (1848) Die Nationalökonomie der Gegenwart und Zukunft, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  7. Hufeland, G. (1807) Neue Grundlegung der Staatswirthschaftskunst, Gießen and Wetzlar: Tasche und Müller.Google Scholar
  8. Hutchison, T. (1973)’ some Themes from Investigations into Method, in J. R.Google Scholar
  9. Hicks and W. Weber (eds), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Iggers, G. (1997) Deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft, Vienna: Böhlau.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kauder, E. (1958) ‘Intellectual and Political Roots of the Older Austrian School, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 17(4): 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kauder, E. (1962) ‘Aus Mengers nachgelassenen Papieren, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 89(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. Kerschagl, R. (1925) Einführung in die Methodenlehre der Nationalökonomie, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
  14. Keynes, J. N. (1891) The Scope and Method of Political Economy, New York: A. M. Kelley, reprint 1955.Google Scholar
  15. Knies, K. (1853) Die Politische Ökonomie vom Standpunkt der geschichtlichen Methode, Braunschweig: Schwetschke.Google Scholar
  16. Menger, C. (1871) Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre, Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller.Google Scholar
  17. Menger, C. (1883) Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Ökonomie insbesondere, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  18. Menger, C. (1981) Principles of Economics, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Menger, C. (1985) Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Milford, K. (1989) Zu den Lösungsversuchen des Induktionsproblems und des Abgrenzungsproblems bei Carl Menger, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Veröffentlichungen der Kommission für Sozial-und Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Bd 27, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien.Google Scholar
  21. Milford, K. (1990) ‘Menger’s methodology’, in Caldwell (ed.) (1990).Google Scholar
  22. Milford, K. (1995) ‘Roscher s Epistemological and Methodological Position: Its Importance for the Methodenstreit’, Journal of Economic Studies, 22(3/4/5): 26–52.Google Scholar
  23. Popper, K. R. (1962) Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  24. Popper, K. R. (1966) The Open Society and its Enemies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Roscher, W. (1838) De historicae doctrinae apud Sophistas majores vestigiis, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  26. Roscher, W. (1842) Leben, Werk und Zeitalter des Thukydides, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  27. Roscher, W. (1886) Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie, Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  28. Schmoller, G. (1883) ‘Zur Methodologie der Staats-und Sozialwissenschaften’, Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft, 7: 975–94.Google Scholar
  29. Schmoller, G. (1900–1904) Grundriss der Allgemeinen Volkswirtschaftslehre,Vol. I 1900, Vol. II 1904, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, B. (1990) ‘Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics’, in Caldwell (ed.) (1990).Google Scholar
  31. Weber, M. [1903] (1975) Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problems of Historical Economics, London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Karl Milford 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Milford

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations