Advertisement

Interdisciplinary Field or Emerging Discipline?: Performance Studies at the University of Sydney

  • Gay McAuley
Part of the Performance Interventions book series (PIPI)

Abstract

At the final session of the PSi (Performance Studies international) conference in Singapore in 2004, conference co-organizer Ray Langenbach reported that preliminary analysis of the participants indicated that 20 percent were locals living in Singapore, 40 percent came from other Asian countries, 15 percent from Europe, and 25 percent from America. Someone called out from the floor, ‘Where did you put Australia?’ The laughter provoked was intensified when Ray admitted that he did not know the answer. This incident reveals in an almost emblematic way the ambivalent position of Australia in relation to dominant geopolitical and cultural forces at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Is Australia part of Europe (the majority of its citizens are of European descent and its institutions are overwhelmingly British in origin), or part of the geographical region (its closest neighbors are Papua New Guinea and Indonesia)? Or has it now become a virtual outpost of the United States, as former Prime Minister John Howard implied when, to the dismay of most Australians, he expressed himself willing to be seen as George Bush’s deputy sheriff in the region?1 It was, of course, an Australian who asked the question, for it is Australians who experience most directly the uncertainties as to where their country is located — and is seen to be located — within the global polity, and where they themselves would locate it.

Keywords

Performance Study Restorative Justice Theatre Study Performance Practice Theatre Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carlson, M. ‘Theatre and Performance at a Time of Shifting Disciplines,’ Theatre Research International, 26:2 (2001) 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Case, S.-E. ‘Feminism and Performance: A Postdisciplinary Couple,’ Theatre Research International, 26:2 (2001) 145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Marinis, M. Semiotica del Teatro: l’analisi testuale dello spettacolo (Bologna: Bompiani, 1982).Google Scholar
  4. De Marinis, M. L’esperienza dello spettatore: fondamenti per une semiotica delle ricezione teatrale (Urbino: Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e Linguistica, 1985).Google Scholar
  5. Drama Review, The. Table of Contents, The Drama Review (TDR), 50:1 (2006) 2–3.Google Scholar
  6. Fischer-Lichte, E. The Show and the Gaze of Theatre: A European Perspective, ed. and trans. Jo Riley (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  7. Fischer-Lichte, E. ‘From Text to Performance: The Rise of Theatre Studies as an Academic Discipline in Germany,’ Theatre Research International, 24:2 (1999) 168–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzpatrick, T. (ed.) Performance: From Product to Process (Sydney: Frederick May Foundation for Italian Studies, 1989).Google Scholar
  9. Geertz, C. The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973).Google Scholar
  10. Geertz, C. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, S. Professing Performance: Theatre in the Academy from Philology to Performativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson, S. ‘Caravans Continued: In Memory of Dwight Conquergood,’ The Drama Review (TDR), 50:1 (2006) 28–32.Google Scholar
  14. Jordan, R. ‘Universities,’ Companion to the Theatre in Australia, ed. P. Parsons (Sydney: Currency Press, 1995), pp. 619–21.Google Scholar
  15. Maxwell, I. ‘Parallel Evolution: Performance Studies at the University of Sydney,’ The Drama Review (TDR), 50:1 (2006) 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McAuley, G. ‘Towards an Ethnography of Rehearsal,’ New Theatre Quarterly, 14:1 (1998) 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McAuley, G. Space in Performance: Making Meaning in the Theatre (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  18. McAuley, G. ‘Performance Studies: Definitions, Methodologies, Future Directions,’ Australasian Drama Studies, 39, special issue on ‘Performance Studies in Australia’ (2001) 5–19.Google Scholar
  19. McAuley, G. (ed.) About Performance, 6, special issue on ‘Rehearsal and Performance Making Processes’ (2006).Google Scholar
  20. McAuley, G. ‘Not Magic but Work: Rehearsal and the Production of Meaning,’ Theatre Research International, 33: 3, special issue on ‘Genetics of Performance,’ guest ed.J. Féral (2008) 276–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKenzie, J. 2001. Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance (London and New York: Routledge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavis, P. Dictionnaire du Théâtre (Paris: Messidor/Editions Sociales, 1980).Google Scholar
  23. Pavis, P. ‘Theatre Studies and Interdisciplinarity,’ Theatre Research International, 26:2 (2001) 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schechner, R. Between Theatre and Anthropology (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  25. Schechner, R. ‘Performance Studies: The Broad Spectrum Approach,’ The Drama Review (TDR), 32:3 (1988) 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schechner, R. ‘Mainstream Theatre and Performance Studies,’ The Drama Review (TDR), 44:2 (2000) 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schechner, R. Performance Studies: An Introduction (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
  28. Shepherd, S. and M. Wallis. Drama/Theatre/Performance (London and New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
  29. Shevtsova, M. (ed.) Theatre Research International, 26:2, special issue on ‘Theatre and Interdisciplinarity’ (2001).Google Scholar
  30. Threadgold, T. ‘Postmodernism and the Politics of Culture: Chekhov’s Three Sisters in Rehearsal and Performance,’ Southern Review, 28:2 (1995) 172–82.Google Scholar
  31. Threadgold, T. Feminist Poetics: Poiesis, Performance, Histories (London and New York: Routledge, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turner, V. From Ritual to Theatre (New York: PAJ Publications, 1982).Google Scholar
  33. Turner, V. The Anthropology of Performance (New York: PAJ Publications, 1987).Google Scholar
  34. Ubersfeld, A. Lire le Théâtre (Paris: Editions Sociales, 1977).Google Scholar
  35. Ubersfeld, A. L’Ecole du Spectateur (Paris: Editions Sociales, 1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gay McAuley 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gay McAuley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations