Shrieking Sisters and Bawling Brothers: Sibling Rivalry in Sarah Grand and Mary Cholmondeley

  • Galia Ofek
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores conflicts between brothers and sisters in Sarah Grand’s The Beth Book (1897) and Mary Cholmondeley’s Red Pottage (1899), where domestic disputes over property and money focus the discussion of rivalry on material issues. Yet the balance of power between the siblings hangs on competing narratives and conflicting readings as much as it depends on quantifiable legal and pecuniary gains. Contrasting interpretations of the text that both brother and sister claim to share — the Bible — promote their competing claims to authorship and possession. Both novels locate the issue of unequal inheritance at the core of the power struggle between the sexes in general, and family discord in particular. Grand and Cholmondeley present primogeniture as a system that perpetuates women’s cultural, social and financial dispossession, and examine its effects against the backdrop of contemporary political debates about women’s rights to their own possessions and biblical tales of sibling rivalry.

Keywords

Sister Relationship Sibling Rivalry Woman Writer Domestic Dispute Biblical Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Quoted in Ann D. Braude, ‘Spirits Defend the Rights of Women: Spiritualism and Changing Sex Roles in Nineteenth-century America’, in Women, Religion and Social Change, eds. Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad and Ellison Banks Findly (New York: SUNY Press, 1985), p. 422.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edmund Maurice, ed., Life of Octavia Hill as Told in her Letters (London: Macmillan, 1913), p. 4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Margaret Homans, ‘Eliot, Wordsworth and the Scenes of the Sisters’ Instruction’, Writing and Sexual Difference, ed. Elizabeth Abel (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1982), p. 54.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valerie Sanders, The Brother-Sister Culture in Nineteenth-Century Literature from Austen to Woolf (Basingstoke: Palgrave — now Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 11Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul Milton, ‘Inheritance as the Key to all Mythologies: George Eliot and Legal Practice’, Mosaic 28.1 (1995), p. 49.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elizabeth Helsinger, Robin Lauterbach Sheets, William Veeder, The Woman Question: Social Issues 1837–1883, vol. 2 Society and Literature in Britain and America (New York: Garland, 1983), pp. 165–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    For a discussion on the cultural impact of the Higher criticism, see Bernard Reardon, Religious Thought in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966), pp. 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.
    Sarah Grand, ‘The Bawling Brotherhood’, Review of Reviews (1894) 9, p. 384.Google Scholar
  9. Ann Heilmann, Journalistic Writings and Contemporary Reception, in Sex, Social Purity and Sarah Grand vol. 1 (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 354.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grand, ‘The New Aspect of the Woman Question’, North American Review (1894) 158: 271–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarah Grand, The Beth Book (Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1994), p. 509.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ann Heilmann, New Woman Strategies: Sarah Grand, Olive Schreiner, Mona Caird (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), p. 18.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grand, ‘The Modem Girl’, North American Review (1894) 158: 706–14.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grand, ‘The New Woman and the Old’, Lady’s Realm (1898) 4: 466–70.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    Susan Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990), pp. 116–18.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    For a detailed discussion of spinsters’ preference for female legatees, see Penelope Lane’s ‘Women, Property and Inheritance: Wealth Creation and Income Generation in Small English Towns, 1750–1835’ (pp. 184–90) and Green’s ‘Independent Women, Wealth and Wills in Nineteenth-Century London’ (pp. 217–22), both in Stobart & Owens, Urban Fortunes: Property and Inheritance in the Town, 1799–1900 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    Mary Cholmondeley, Under One Roof (London: John Murray, 1918), p. 4.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 1, eds. Skinner, Campbell & Todd (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976), p. 384.Google Scholar
  19. 23.
    Steven Mintz, A Prison of Expectations: The Family in Victorian Culture (New York: New York University Press, 1985), pp. 149–50.Google Scholar
  20. 25.
    Lee Holcombe, Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women’s Property Law in Nineteenth-century England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983), p. 118.Google Scholar
  21. 26.
    Lee Holcombe, ‘Victorian Wives and Property Reform of the Married Women’s Property Law, 1857–1882’, in A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women, ed. Martha Vicinus (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977), p. 7.Google Scholar
  22. 28.
    Richardo J. Quinones, The Chains of Cain: Violence and the Lost Brother in Cain and Abel Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991), pp. 25–7.Google Scholar
  23. 31.
    Mrs Sarah Trimmer, Help to the Unlearned in the Study of the Holy Scriptures, quoted in Prickett & Jasper’s The Bible and Literature: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), p. 126.Google Scholar
  24. 36.
    Ann Heilmann, New Woman Fiction: Women Writing First-Wave Feminism (Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 2000), p. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 38.
    Elizabeth Cady Stanton, The Woman’s Bible (Salem: Ayer, 1988), pp. 14–20.Google Scholar
  26. 39.
    Charlotte Carmichael Stopes, ‘“Woman” in the Vision of Creation’, Shafts 1.4, 26 November 1892, p. 55.Google Scholar
  27. 40.
    Elizabeth Cady Stanton, ‘An Extract from The Woman’s Bible’, Shafts 5.5, May 1897, p. 141.Google Scholar
  28. 41.
    Teresa Mangum, Married, Middlebrow and Militant (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), pp. 99Google Scholar
  29. 42.
    Susan Kingsley Kent, Sex and Suffrage in Britain 1860–1914 (London: Routledge, 1990), p. 10.Google Scholar
  30. 43.
    Barbara Caine, Victorian Feminists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 163.Google Scholar
  31. 45.
    Rose Lovell-Smith, ‘Science and Religion in the Feminist Fin-de-Siècle and A New Reading of Olive Schreiner’s From Man to Man’, Victorian Literature and Culture, 29.2 (2001): p. 307.Google Scholar
  32. 50.
    Israel Zangwill, ‘The Month in England’, Cosmopolitan 24 (1898), p. 455.Google Scholar
  33. 51.
    Ilana Pardes, Countertraditions in the Bible: A Feminist Approach (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992), p. 99.Google Scholar
  34. 52.
    Kate Flint, The Woman Reader 1837–1914 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), p. 311.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Galia Ofek 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Galia Ofek

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations