Advertisement

Innovation Strategies in Brazil, China and India: From Imitation to Deepening Technological Capability in the South

  • Carl Dahlman
Chapter

Abstract

There has been a strong interest on the link between invention, innovation and economic growth among both academics and policy-makers.’ Much of the earlier work focused on the link between R&D and economic growth. Over time, as there has been greater understanding of the complexity of the relationships, the focus has broadened to innovation and economic growth.2 However much of the analysis has focused on innovation as something that is new at the frontier of global technology. As a result, much of the effort has continued to be focused on the relationship between R&D, global innovation and economic growth.

Keywords

Gross Domestic Product World Trade Organization Purchase Power Parity Innovation Strategy Intellectual Property Right 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt (2006), ‘Appropriate growth policy: A unifying framework’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 (2/3), 269–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerswald, Philip and Lewis Branscomb (2008), ‘Research and innovation in a networked world’, Technology and Society, 30, 339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, Richard (2006), ‘Globalization: The great unbundling(s)’, paper contributed to event on Globalization Challenges to Europe and Finland organized by the Secretariat of the Economic Council, Prime Minister’s Office (June).Google Scholar
  4. Dahlman, Carl, Douglas Zhihua Zeng and Shuilin Wang (2007), Enhancing China’s Competitiveness through Life Long Learning. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dutz, Mark A. (ed.) (2007), Unleashing India’s Innovation: Towards Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (2008), European Innovation Scoreboard 2007 — Interactive benchmarking. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/ Google Scholar
  7. Fagerberg, J.D, D. Mowery and R. Nelson, eds (2006), Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gill, Indermit and Homi Kharas (2007), An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IMF (2009), ‘World Economic Outlook July Update’. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  10. Krueger, A.B and M. Lindale (2001), ‘Education and growth: Why and for whom?’ Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIX.Google Scholar
  11. Jaruzelski, B. and K. Dehoff (2008), ‘Beyond borders: The global innovation 1000’, in Booz Allen Hamilton, Strategy and Business (53).Google Scholar
  12. Lall, Sanjaya (2003), ‘Reinventing industrial strategy: The role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness’, Working Paper No. 111 (October). Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House.Google Scholar
  13. Lall, Sanjaya (2004), ‘Industrial success and failure in a globalizing world’, International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 3 (3), 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lall, Sanjaya and John Weiss (2005), ‘China’s competitive threat to Latin America: An analysis for 1990–2002’, Working Paper No. 120. Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House.Google Scholar
  15. Naughton, Barry (2007), The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005a), Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005b), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007), Science Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008), Science Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  20. Pavitt, Keith and William Walker (1976), ‘Government policy towards industrial innovation: A review’, Research Policy, 5, 11–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodriguez, Alberto, Carl J. Dahlman and Jamil Salmi (2008), Brazil: Knowledge and Innovation for Competitiveness. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soete, Luc (2008), ‘Science, technology and development. Emerging concepts and visions’, Maastrict University UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series, 2008–001.Google Scholar
  23. UNCTAD (2008), Handbook of Statistics. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  24. UNESCO (2009), Global Education Digest. Montreal: UNESCO Institute of Statistics.Google Scholar
  25. World Bank (2008a), ‘Knowledge assessment methodology 2008’, see www.worldbank.org/kam.Google Scholar
  26. World Bank (2008b), World Development Indicators 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. World Bank (2009), World Developmentlndicators 2009. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. World Economic Forum (WEF) (2009/10 and 2000), Global Competitiveness Report. Geneva: WEF.Google Scholar
  29. Xue, Lan (2007), ‘The changing roles of universities in China’s national innovation system’. PowerPoint presentation at World Bank Conference in Prague.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Carl Dahlman 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl Dahlman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations