Nuclear Illusion, Nuclear Reality pp 78-141 | Cite as
Policy Execution 1958–61
Abstract
The British nuclear-weapons programme grew in maturity in the period between 1958 and 1961. At the end of 1958, there were probably only 58 deliverable first-generation Blue Danube bombs available to the RAF, and five of the interim megaton bomb Violet Club. Three years later, there were nearly 200 weapons of British manufacture in the stockpile, including much more operationally flexible designs: the light-weight kiloton weapon Red Beard and the megaton H-bomb Yellow Sun Mk.2. The acute constraints of fissile material shortage, engineering capacity and the testing moratorium were eased by the growing atomic relationship with the United States. Great strides appear to have been made at Aldermaston — not just in copying, or more strictly speaking anglicising, US nuclear warhead designs, but in original and joint US/UK work on new requirements. Collaboration with the US appears not to have led to a feeling of subordination, but to have increased confidence at Aldermaston. The RAF certainly also gained in confidence, exercising its growing number of V-bomber squadrons to forge a real nuclear bombing capability, with real targets in real war plans, and improving in particular its state of operational readiness. British nuclear weapons were deployed overseas, to equip RAF Canberras in Cyprus and naval strike aircraft worldwide.
Keywords
Nuclear Weapon Blue Water Enrich Uranium Ballistic Missile Photo CourtesyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 6.Simpson, The independent nuclear state, app. 4; David Albright, Frans Berkhout and William Walker, Plutonium and highly enriched uranium 1996: world inventories, capabilities and policies (OUP/SIPRI 1997), p. 63.Google Scholar
- 12.Don McIntyre, ‘Project Crystal: lithium-6 for H-bombs’, presentation to the British Rocketry Oral History Project conference at Charterhouse, April 2007; PRO, note of 14 Jun 1961 in AVIA 65/2332.Google Scholar
- 17.Arnold, Britain and the H-bomb, pp. 78–9; John Challens, ‘Sir William Richard Joseph Cook (1905–87)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography; William Penney and V H B Macklen, ‘William Richard Joseph Cook’, Biographical memoirs of fellows of the Royal Society 34 (1988), pp. 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Carey Sublette, Nuclear weapons frequently asked questions, §4.5: http://nuclear-weaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4-5.html (accessed Aug 2007); data from Dominic test series: http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Dominic. html (accessed Aug 1997).Google Scholar
- 21.The best accounts are in Robert S Norris, Andrew S Burrows and Richard W Fieldhouse, Nuclear weapons databook, Vol. 5: British, French and Chinese nuclear weapons (Oxford, NRDC/Westview 1994), pp. 46–9; Arnold, Britain and the H-bomb, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar
- 28.Richard Moore, ‘British nuclear warhead design 1958–66: how much American help?’, Defence Studies 4/2 (Summer 2004), pp. 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Frank Bongiorno, ‘The price of nostalgia: Menzies, the “Liberal” tradition and Australian foreign policy’, Australian Journal of Politics and History 51/3 (2005), pp. 400–17;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wayne Reynolds, Australia’s bid for the atomic bomb (Melbourne UP 2000).Google Scholar
- 40.Lorna Arnold and Mark Smith, Britain, Australia and the bomb: the nuclear tests and their aftermath (Palgrave 2006), p. 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Australian Government Publishing Service, Report of the Royal Commission into British nuclear tests in Australia, Vol. 2 (Canberra, AGPS 1985), pp. 505, 414.Google Scholar
- 45.Peter Morton, Fire across the desert: Woomera and the Anglo-Australian joint project 1946–80 (Canberra, AGPS 1989).Google Scholar
- 49.Jim Walsh, ‘Surprise down under: the secret history of Australia’s nuclear ambitions’, The Nonproliferation Review (Fall 1997), pp. 1–20; Reynolds, Australia’s bid for the atomic bomb.Google Scholar
- 68.Ken Delve, Peter Green and John Clemons, English Electric Canberra (Leicester, Midland Counties 1992), pp. 46–7, 59–64.Google Scholar
- 74.The technical and operational history of the Thor force is well described by John Boyes in ‘Project Emily: the Thor IRBM and the Royal Air Force 1959–63’, Prospero 4 (Spring 2007), pp. 7–39, and in his new book Project Emily: Thor IRBM and the RAF (Stroud, Tempus 2008); see also Wynn, RAF strategic nuclear deterrent forces, ch. 17, 21; Twigge and Scott, Planning Armageddon, pp. 109–19.Google Scholar
- 86.ibid., pp. 112, 206; Boyes, ‘Project Emily’, p. 22; Philip Nash, The other missiles of October: Eisenhower, Kennedy and the Jupiters 1957–63 (Chapel Hill NC, Univ of North Carolina Press 1997), p. 86.Google Scholar
- 92.George Hicks (ed. Roy Dommett), ‘History of RAE and nuclear weapons’, Prospero 2 (Spring 2005), p. 167.Google Scholar
- 103.For more technical details of the missile development, see R H Francis, ‘The development of Blue Steel’, Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society 68 (May 1964), pp. 303–22; John E Allen, ‘Blue Steel and developments’, History of the UK strategic deterrent: proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society symposium 17 March 1999, pp. 4.1–25; Hill, A vertical empire, ch. 4.Google Scholar
- 112.For accounts of the technical history of Blue Streak, see papers in History of the UK strategic deterrent: proceedings of the Royal Aeronautical Society symposium 17 March 1999; Roy Dommett, ‘The Blue Streak weapon’, Prospero 2 (Spring 2005), pp. 7–33; Hill, A vertical empire, ch. 5–6; Wynn, RAF strategic nuclear deterrent forces, ch. 23; Morton, Fire across the desert, ch. 22; Martin, De Havilland Blue Streak.Google Scholar
- 115.Wayne Cocroft and Roger Thomas, Cold War: building for nuclear confrontation 1946–89 (English Heritage 2003), pp. 46–7.Google Scholar
- 121.Roy Dommett, ‘Ballistic missile defence’, lecture to the guided flight group of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 28 Apr 1994.Google Scholar
- 169.Chuck Hansen, US nuclear weapons: the secret history (Arlington TX, Aerofax 1988), pp. 203–5; Spinardi, From Polaris to Trident, pp. 53–5; http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/intro/miniaturization.htm (accessed Aug 2007).Google Scholar
- 216.Richard Moore, ‘Surface-to-air guided weapons for UK air defence in the 1950s’, Prospero 2 (Spring 2005), pp. 193–212.Google Scholar
- 226.David Brown and George Moore, Rebuilding the Royal Navy: warship design since 1945 (Chatham 2003), pp. 37–8; PRO, Nash to 1SL, 1 Dec 1960 in ADM 1/27876.Google Scholar
- 228.Jeremy Stocker, Britain and ballistic missile defence 1942–2002 (Frank Cass 2004), pp. 71, 247–9.Google Scholar
- 253.Harvey Sapolsky, The Polaris system development: bureaucratic and programmatic success in government (Cambridge Mass, Harvard UP 1972), pp. 34–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 259.Adm William J Crowe USN, ‘The policy roots of the modern Royal Navy 1945–63’, unpublished PhD dissertation (Princeton 1965), p. 256.Google Scholar
- 264.PRO, Mountbatten to Burke, 8 May 1958 in ADM 205/179 and other papers here, in ADM 1/27375 and in Hartley Library, MB1/I447. Simeon’s account of his posting is in ‘Watching brief 1958–60’ in Capt John Moore RN, ed., The impact of Polaris: the origins of Britain’s seaborne nuclear deterrent (Huddersfield, Richard Netherwood 1999), pp. 34–7.Google Scholar
- 269.Neil McCart, HMS Victorious 1937–69 (Cheltenham, Fan 1998), pp. 118–19.Google Scholar