Mutualism and the Reinvention of Civil Society: A Conservative Agenda?

  • Charlie Ellis
Chapter

Abstract

I am glad that in the friendly society movement we know no politics. Politics have such powers of penetrating most things that I am thankful that this movement has never been captured by any of the political machines. (Stanley Baldwin, ‘Friendly Societies’, 1924)2

Though the ‘demutualisation’ of insurance and building societies has been rapid in recent years,3 the promotion of the third or mutual sector has, since the early 1990s, become a fashionable theme in British politics.4 In essence its proponents seek to devolve activities currently performed by state institutions to communally run and mutually owned providers. Mutualism has taken over from stakeholding, communitarianism, citizenship as a ‘buzzword’ in think-tank publications, opinion pieces and political speeches, which often contain wistful invocations of friendly societies and self-help. Mutualism forms a sub-theme of the wider debate surrounding the desire to reinvigorate or ‘reinvent’ civil society,5 and attempts to promote ‘localism’6 and has attracted interest from those holding differing ideological positions and party affiliations.

Keywords

Civil Society Welfare State Free Market British Society Voluntary Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Stanley Baldwin, On England, and Other Addresses (Freeport, New York: Books for Libraries Press, 1926), p. 263.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    M. Stephens, ‘Building Society Demutualisation in the UK’, Housing Studies 16. 3 (2001), pp. 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    C. Leadbeater and I. Christie, To Our Mutual Advantage (London: Demos, 1999).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    N. Deakin, In Search of Civil Society (Basingstoke: Palgrave, now Palgrave Macmillan, 2001);Google Scholar
  5. K. Kumar, ‘Civil Society: An Inquiry into the Usefulness of an Historical Term’, British Journal of Sociology 44.3 (1993), pp. 375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Jenkins, Big Bang Localism (London: Policy Exchange, 2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Greenleaf, The British Political Tradition — Vol. II: The Ideological Heritage (London: Methuen, 1983), p. 7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Whelan, ‘Foreword’, to F. Prochaska, Schools of Citizenship (London: Civitas, 2002), p. x.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Hirst, Associative Democracy (Cambridge: Polity, 1994), p. 13.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Sacks, The Politics of Hope (London: Vintage, 2000), pp. xiii–xiv.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Kellner, The New Mutualism (London: Co-operative Press, 1998), p. 7.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    D. Willetts, ‘Civic Conservatism Revisited’, in J. Tate (ed.), What’s Right Now (London: SMF, 2006).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    W. Grant, ‘The Erosion of Intermediary Institutions’, Political Quarterly 60.1 (1989), pp. 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 18.
    M. Phillips, ‘There’s a little catch for the Brown volunteers’, Sunday Times (14 January 2001).Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    O. Letwin, ‘Cameron Conservatism’, Speech to Policy Exchange (9 May 2007).Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Social Justice Policy Group, Breakthrough Britain — Vol. 6 — Third Sector (London: Centre for Social Justice, 2007), p. 13.Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    W. Beveridge, Voluntary Action (London: Allen and Unwin, 1948), p. 10.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    D. Marsland, ‘The Roots and Consequences of Paternalist Collectivism: Beveridge and His Influence’, Social Policy and Administration 26.2 (1992), pp. 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 25.
    O. Letwin, ‘For Labour There Is No Such Thing as Society, Only the State’, in G. Streeter (ed.), There Is Such a Thing as Society (London: Politicos, 2002).Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    E. Barker, Britain and the British People (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1942), pp. 26–8.Google Scholar
  21. 27.
    D. Willetts, ‘Civic Conservatism’, in J. Gray and D. Willetts, Is Conservatism Dead? (London: Profile, 1997).Google Scholar
  22. 28.
    R. J. McDonald, The Socialist Movement (London: Williams, 1912), p. xi.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    F. Mount, Clubbing Together: The Revival of the Voluntary Principle (London: WH Smith, 1993), p. 14.Google Scholar
  24. 32.
    F. Field, Neighbours from Hell (London: Politicos, 2003), p. 27.Google Scholar
  25. 33.
    C. Ward, ‘Roads to Freedom’, New Statesman and Society (28 July 1995), pp. 23–6.Google Scholar
  26. 34.
    G. Wheatcroft, ‘A hidden stream of freedom’, Times Literary Supplement (27 August 1999), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  27. 36.
    P. Barker, ‘Anarchy in the suburbs’, Prospect (July 1999).Google Scholar
  28. 37.
    F. Mount, ‘Floreat Surburbia’, Times Literary Supplement (25 December 1998), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
  29. 38.
    D. Green, The Welfare State: For Rich or for Poor? (London: IEA, 1982), p. 40.Google Scholar
  30. 39.
    C. Ward, ‘Fringe Benefits’, New Statesman and Society (21 April 1995).Google Scholar
  31. 40.
    C. Ward, Social Policy: An Anarchist Response (London: Freedom Press, 1996), p. 15.Google Scholar
  32. 41.
    C. Ward, ‘Fringe Benefits’, New Statesman and Society (17–31 December 1993).Google Scholar
  33. 44.
    S. Meredith and P. Catney, ‘New Labour and Associative Democracy: Old Debates in New Times?’ British Politics 2.3 (2007), pp. 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 45.
    P. Hirst, ‘From Statism to Pluralism’, in B. Pimlott, A. Wright and T. Flower (eds), The Alternative (London: W. H. Allen, 1990), p. 22, emphasis added.Google Scholar
  35. 50.
    R. Scruton, England: An Elergy (London: Pimlico, 2001), p. 17, emphasis added.Google Scholar
  36. 53.
    D. Green, ‘Privatisation of Morality’ (<http://www.kingston.ac.uk/cusp/Publications/CuspReview/Moral.htm>, accessed 12 August 2006).Google Scholar
  37. 54.
    R. Whelan, Involuntary Action (London: IEA, 1999), p. x.Google Scholar
  38. 56.
    See D. Green, ‘Arguments for Liberty: A Reply to Tony Benn’, Political Quarterly 53.4 (1982), pp. 418–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 58.
    D. Green, Reinventing Civil Society (London: IEA, 1993), p. 10.Google Scholar
  40. 59.
    M. Oakeshott, ‘The Political Economy of Freedom’, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1991), p. 399.Google Scholar
  41. 60.
    E. Shils, The Virtue of Civility (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1997), p. 333.Google Scholar
  42. 62.
    A. J. Davies, We, the Nation: The Conservative Party and the Pursuit of Power (London: Little Brown, 1995), p. 59.Google Scholar
  43. 63.
    P. Hirst, From Statism to Pluralism (London: UCL Press, 1997), p. 136.Google Scholar
  44. 66.
    N. Ashford, ‘Distilled Doctrine’, Salisbury Review (September 1987).Google Scholar
  45. 69.
    E. H. H. Green, Ideologies of Conservatism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 70.
    Green, quoted by J. Lloyd, ‘Now There Is Such a Thing as Society’, New Statesman (11 September 2000).Google Scholar
  47. 71.
    Danny Kruger, ‘Right Dialectic’, Prospect (September 2006).Google Scholar
  48. 72.
    D. Green, Reinventing Civil Society (London: IEA, 1993), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  49. 73.
    D. Green, Working-Class Patients and the Medical Establishment (Aldershot: Gower/Temple, 1985), p. 1.Google Scholar
  50. 74.
    D. Green, Community without Politics (London: IEA, 1996), p. 35.Google Scholar
  51. 79.
    D. Green, Civil Society (London: Civitas, 2000), p. 16.Google Scholar
  52. 82.
    Hirst, From Statism to Pluralism, pp. 13 7–40. See P. Gosden, Self-Help: Voluntary Associations in Nineteenth-century Britain (London: Batsford, 1973), Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  53. 84.
    N. Boles, ‘Tories Remade’, Prospect (April 2006).Google Scholar
  54. 85.
    D. Green, ‘David Cameron has fallen into Labour’s trap’, Sunday Telegraph (31 December 2006).Google Scholar
  55. 87.
    A. H. Halsey, Change in British Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 178.Google Scholar
  56. 88.
    A. H. Halsey, ‘Foreword’, in N. Dennis and G. Erdos, Families without Fatherhood (London: Civitas, 2000), p. xiii.Google Scholar
  57. 89.
    A. H. Halsey, No Discouragement (Basingstoke: Macmillan, now Palgrave Macmillan, 1996), p. 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 90.
    M. Phillips, ‘Welfare and the Common Good’, in F. Field, Stakeholder Welfare (London: IEA, 1996), p. 105.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Charlie Ellis 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlie Ellis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations