Advertisement

Phraseology and Epistemology in Academic Book Reviews: A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Two Humanities Disciplines

  • Nicholas Groom

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to identify relationships between phraseology and epistemology in the discourses of two humanities disciplines, history and literary criticism. The empirical focus of the chapter will be on two large computerized corpora of book review texts compiled from academic journals in these two disciplines. Using the tools and methods of corpus-driven linguistics (Tognini-Bonelli, 2001; Hunston, 2002; Sinclair, 2003, 2004), I will show how one of the core epistemological values of history and literary criticism as humanities disciplines is reflected in a range of notable phraseological features in the peer review genres represented by these two corpora.

Keywords

Knowledge Domain Noun Phrase Book Review Literary Criticism Humanity Discipline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazerman, C. (1981) ‘What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic discourse’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, XI, 3, 361–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becher, T. (1987) ‘Disciplinary Discourse’, Studies in Higher Education, XII, 3, 261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becher, T. (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines (Milton Keynes: SHRE/Open University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Becher, T. (1994) ‘The Significance of Disciplinary Differences’, Studies in Higher Education, XIX, 2, 151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture ofDisciplines, 2nd edn (Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. (2004) ‘“If You Look at...” Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks’, Applied Linguistics, XXV, 3, 371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Francis, G., Manning, E. and Hunston, S. (1996) Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs (London: HarperCollins).Google Scholar
  8. Gledhill, C. (2000) Collocations in Science Writing (Tübingen: Gunter Narr.).Google Scholar
  9. Groom, N. (2005) ‘Pattern and Meaning across Genres and Disciplines: An Exploratory Study’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, IV, 3, 257–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groom, N. (2007) Phraseology and Epistemology in Humanities Writing: A Corpus-Driven Study (Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK).Google Scholar
  11. Groom, N. (forthcoming) ‘Closed-Class Keywords and Corpus-Driven Discourse Analysis’ in M. Scott and M. Bondi (eds) Keyness in Text (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, J. and Nesi, H. (forthcoming) ‘Verbal and Mental Processes in Academic Disciplines’ in M. Charles, S. Hunston and D. Pecorari (eds) Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
  13. Hunston, S. (2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunston, S. (2008) ‘Starting with the Small Words: Patterns, Lexis and Semantic Sequences’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, XIII, 3, 271–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (London: Longman).Google Scholar
  16. Hyland, K. (2007) ‘Different Strokes for Different Folks: Disciplinary Variation in Academic Writing’ in K. Flottum (ed.) Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), 89–108.Google Scholar
  17. Hyland, K. (2008) ‘“As Can Be Seen”: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation’, English for Specific Purposes, XXVII, 1, 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moreno, A. I. and Suárez, L. (2008) ‘A Study of Critical Attitude across English and Spanish Academic Book Reviews’, Journal ofEnglish for Academic Purposes, VII, 1, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Motta-Roth, D. (1998) ‘Discourse Analysis and Academic Book Reviews: A Study of Text and Disciplinary Cultures’ in I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J. C. Palmer and J. F. Coll (eds) Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes (Castello de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I), 29–58.Google Scholar
  20. North, S. (2005) ‘Disciplinary Variation in the Use of Theme in Undergraduate Essays, Applied Linguistics, XXVI, 3, 431–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oakey, D. J. (2009) ‘Fixed Collocational Patterns in Isolexical and Isotextual Versions of a Corpus’ in P. Baker (ed.) Approaches to Corpus Linguistics (London: Continuum), 142–60.Google Scholar
  22. Parry, S. (1998) ‘Disciplinary Discourse in Doctoral Theses’, Higher Education, XXXVI, 3, 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scott, M. and Tribble, C. (2006) Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sinclair, J. McH. (2003) Reading Concordances (Harlow: Pearson Education).Google Scholar
  25. Sinclair, J. McH. (2004) Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  26. Stubbs, M. (1986) ‘A Matter of Prolonged Field Work: Notes toward a Modal Grammar of English’, Applied Linguistics, VII, 1, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, G. (2000) ‘The Generic and the Disciplined: Can Universal and Particular Be Reconciled?’ in G. Crosling, T. Moore and S. Vance (eds) The Learning Dimension: Proceedings of the Third National Language and Academic Skills Conference (Melbourne: Monash University), 156–62.Google Scholar
  29. Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001) Corpus Linguistics at Work (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nicholas Groom 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Groom

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations