Reporting and Evaluation in English Book Review Articles: A Cross-Disciplinary Study

  • Giuliana Diani

Abstract

This chapter explores a review genre — the book review article — that is something of a hybrid. It often appears in the book review section of academic journals yet differs from both book reviews and review articles. Its primary function is to evaluate the knowledge claims of other researchers in the context of their publications. This is clearly different from a book review which functions to evaluate a range of features of books (Hyland, 2000).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar ofSpoken and Written English (London: Longman).Google Scholar
  2. Bondi, M. (1999) English across Genres: Language Variation in the Discourse of Economics (Modena: Il Fiorino).Google Scholar
  3. Bres, J. and Verine, B. (2002) ‘Le Bruissement des Voix dans le Discours: Dialogisme et Discours Rapporté’, Faits de Langue, XIX, 159–70.Google Scholar
  4. Flottum, K., Dahl, T. and Kinn, T. (2006) Academic Voices (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hunston, S. (2004) ‘“It Has Rightly Been Pointed Out...” Attribution, Consensus and Conflict in Academic Discourse’ in M. Bondi, L. Gavioli and M. Silver (eds) Academic Discourse, Genre and Small Corpora (Rome: Officina Edizioni), 15–33.Google Scholar
  6. Hyland, K. (1999) ‘Disciplinary Discourses: Writer Stance in Research Articles’ in C. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds) Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices (London: Longman), 99–121.Google Scholar
  7. Hyland, K. (2000) ‘Academic Attribution: Interaction through Citation’ in K. Hyland Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (London: Longman), 41–62.Google Scholar
  8. Hyland, K. (2001) ‘Humble Servants of the Discipline? Self-Mention in Research Articles’, English for Specific Purposes, XX, 3, 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyland, K. (2002a) ‘Authority and Visibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing’, Journal of Pragmatics, XXXIV, 8, 1091–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyland, K. (2002b) ‘Activity and Evaluation: Reporting Practices in Academic Writing’ in J. Flowerdew (ed.) Academic Discourse (London: Longman), 115–30.Google Scholar
  11. Scott, M. (1998) WordSmith Tools (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Sinclair, J. McH. (1987) ‘Mirror for a Text’, Manuscript. (Published 1988 Journal of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad, India, 15–44).Google Scholar
  13. Stati, S. (1994) ‘Passive Moves in Argumentation’ in S. Cmejrková and F. Stícha (eds) The Syntax of Sentences and Text (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 259–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Tadros, A. (1993) ‘The Pragmatics of Text Averral and Attribution in Academic Texts’ in M. Hoey (ed.) Data, Description, Discourse (London: HarperCollins Publishers), 98–114.Google Scholar
  16. Thomas, S. and Hawes, T. P. (1994) ‘Reporting Verbs in Medical Journal Articles’, English for Specific Purposes, XIII, 2, 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thompson, P. (2005) ‘Aspects of Identification and Position in Intertextual Reference in PhD Theses’ in E. Tognini-Bonelli and G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds) Strategies in Academic Discourse (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Giuliana Diani 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuliana Diani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations