Advertisement

Introspective Techniques

  • Sandra Lee McKay

Abstract

  1. 1.

    What do you think the term ‘introspective techniques’ refers to?

     
  2. 2.

    How could we find out what language learners are thinking as they do a language task like reading or writing?

     
  3. 3.

    Why would you use diaries in a qualitative research project? What data could you collect using them?

     
  4. 4.

    What are some ways you can encourage your research project respondents to tell you about their real opinions and attitudes rather than telling you what they think you, as the researcher or their teacher, want to hear?

     

Keywords

Language Learning Language Acquisition Verbal Report Diary Entry Reading Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, K. M. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. W. Selinger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 67–103). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, K. M. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 215–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, K. M. (1991). Diary studies of classroom language learning: The doubting game and the believing game. In E. Sadtono (Ed.), Language acquisition and the second/ foreign language classroom (pp. 60–102). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, K. M., & Ochsner, R. (1983). A methodological review of the diary studies: Windmill tilting or social science? In K. M. Bailey, M. H. Long, & S. Peck (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 188–198). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  5. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly 20(3), 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chamot, A. (1999). Teaching learning strategies to language students. ERIC DOC ED 433719. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, J. (2006). A narrative analysis of second language acquisition and identity formation. MA Thesis, Anaheim University Online.Google Scholar
  9. Gu, P., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. (2005). Investigating language learner strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Language and Education 19(4), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobs, G. M. (1997). Can learner strategy instruction succeed? The case of higher order questions and elaborated responses. System 25(4), 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kasper, G. (1998). Analysing verbal protocols. TESOL Quarterly 32(2), 358–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Minami, S. (2003). Sustained-content reading and its effect on reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript, San Francisco State University.Google Scholar
  13. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodgers, T. S. (2000). Assessing learner problem-solving strategies through introspection. Unpublished paper given at the Third International Conference on Language Teaching, Middle Eastern Technical University: Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt, R. W., & Froda, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  17. Skehan, P. (1997). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sandra Lee McKay 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Lee McKay
    • 1
  1. 1.San Francisco State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations