Ruskin, the Theatre and Victorian Visual Culture pp 216-238 | Cite as
‘Auntie, can you do that?’ or ‘Ibsen in Brixton’: Representing the Victorian Stage through Cartoon and Caricature
Abstract
From the mid to late-eighteenth century English satirical prints and caricatures frequently represented not only the performers and spectators of theatrical events in their own right, but also depicted the world itself as theatre. With the development of the cartoon, in our modern sense of the word, and of book illustration in the nineteenth century, together with the widening circulation of illustrated journals and newspapers, new outlets emerged for the dissemination of comical and satirical representations of theatrical subjects. Although this essay will focus on the Victorian period, the traditions of representation developed by Hogarth, Gillray and Rowlandson and the transitional significance of George Cruikshank inevitably lurk in the background. Recently monographs on George IV and on London have been published, based entirely on satirical representations.1 It would be equally possible to publish an illustrated history of English theatre from the mid-eighteenth to the mid-twentieth century relying only on cartoons and caricatures, but such a history would be no less skewed than one based purely on photography or commissioned paintings. However accentuated or exaggerated, caricatures and cartoons provide a unique insight into the social and cultural significance of theatre, offering critique rather than descriptive representation. Yet all too often they are subsequently reproduced as illustrations rather than interrogated as contextual documents or examined for their iconographic and iconological significance in our understanding of English theatre during the Victorian era.
Keywords
Late Eighteenth Century Book Illustration Illustrated Sport Comic Journal Theatrical SubjectPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.See Mark Bills, The Art of Satire: London in Caricature (London: Philip Wilson Publishers, 2006)Google Scholar
- 1.Kenneth Baker, George IV A Life in Caricature (London: Thames and Hudson, 2005).Google Scholar
- 2.‘Painting, Politics and Stage in the Age of Caricature’, in Robyn Asleson, ed., Notorious Muse: The Actress in British Art and Culture 1776–1812 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003), p. 172.Google Scholar
- 3.‘Ally Sloper’s Half Holiday: Comic Art in the 1880s’, in Peter Bailey, Popular Culture and Performance in the Victorian City (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 50.Google Scholar
- 4.Louis James, ‘Cruikshank and Early Victorian Caricature’, History Workshop Journal, 6:1 (1978), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Quoted in John Buchanan-Brown, The Illustrations of William Makepeace Thackeray (Newton Abbot: David and Charles, 1979), p. 24.Google Scholar
- 6.Ernst Kris, Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art (Madison, Connecticut: International Universities Press, 2000), p. 194.Google Scholar
- 7.William Vaughan, British Painting: The Golden Age. From Hogarth to Turner (London: Thames and Hudson, 1999), p. 149.Google Scholar
- 8.Ronald Paulson, ‘The Tradition of Comic Illustration from Hogarth to Cruikshank’, in Robert L. Patten, ed., George Cruikshank A Revaluation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992), p. 56.Google Scholar
- 9.Joseph Hillis Miller, Illustration (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), p. 125.Google Scholar
- 11.This is particularly apparent in an unreferenced picture reproduced in Victor Glasstone’s Victorian and Edwardian Theatres (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975), pp. 54–55.Google Scholar
- 14.Edward Gordon Craig, Henry Irving (London: J. M. Dentand Sons Ltd., 1930), p. 73.Google Scholar
- 17.See Jim Davis, ‘Imperial Transgressions: The Ideology of Drury Lane Pantomime in the Late Nineteenth Century’, New Theatre Quarterly XII:46 (May 1996), 151–154.Google Scholar