Transport TENs

  • Debra Johnson
  • Colin Turner

Abstract

Transport represents the circulatory system of the economy and without it economic activity would atrophy. An efficient, effective transport infrastructure is therefore an essential factor in a nation’s competitiveness. Alongside these economic concerns, the development and configuration of transport infrastructure has vital social and political roles. Thus the configuration of transport networks (including road, rails, inland waterways and the location of ports and airports) helps shape economic activity and determines how and where we live and work. Given its strategic importance, the state has long maintained a major role in controlling, planning and financing transport networks.

Keywords

Transport Mode Transport Infrastructure Transport Policy Freight Transport Priority Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anguera, R. (2006) ‘The Channel Tunnel: an ex-post economic evaluation’, Transportation Research, Part A 40(2006), pp.291–315.Google Scholar
  2. Carbone, V. and Stone, M. (2005) ‘Growth and relational strategies used by the European logistics service providers: rationale and outcomes’, Transportation Research, Part E 41, pp.495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1960) Third General Report on the Activities of the Community.Google Scholar
  4. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1979) The role of the Community in the development of Transport Infrastructure, Bulletin Supplement 8/79.Google Scholar
  5. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1985) Completing the Internal Market, COM(85) 310.Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1992) Commission Communication and Proposal for a Council Decision on the Creation of a European Inland Waterway Network, COM(92) 231.Google Scholar
  7. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1994) Proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision on Community guidelines for the development of a trans-European transport network, COM(94) 106.Google Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1995) Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision on the Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, COM(95) 48.Google Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2001) White Paper — European transport policy for 2010: time to decide, COM(2001) 370.Google Scholar
  10. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004a) Commission Staff Working Paper: Trans-European Transport Network — Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions on the Implementation of the Guidelines for the Period 1998–2001, SEC(2004) 220 of 19 February 2004.Google Scholar
  11. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004b) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/440/EC on the development of the Community’s Railways, COM(2004) 139 final of 3 March 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004c) Further integration of the European rail system: third railway package, COM(2004) 140 final of 3 March 2004.Google Scholar
  13. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004d) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the certification of train crews operating locomotives and trains on the Community’s rail network, COM(2004) 142 final of 3 March 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004e) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on International Rail Passengers’ Rights and Obligations COM(2004) 143 final of 3 March 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004f) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual quality requirements for rail freight services, COM(2004) 144 final of 3 March 2004.Google Scholar
  16. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004g) Commission Staff Working Paper: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/440/EC on the development of the Community’s Railways to gradually open up the market for international passenger services by rail — Extended Impact Assessment, SEC(2004) 263 of 3 March 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004h) Energy and Transport in Figures — 2004, http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/energy_transport/figures/pocketbook/doc/2004/pb2004.pdf — accessed November 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2005a) Draft Commission Decision designating six European coordinators for certain trans-European transport network, July 2005, http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/agency/doc/2005_07_02_coordinator_en.pdf accessed October 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2005b) Trans-European Transport Network: TEN-T priority axes and projects2005, Brussels: DG Tren.Google Scholar
  20. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2005c) Energy and Transport in Figures — 2005, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/figures/pocketbook/doc/2005/etif_2005_transport_en.pdf — accessed May 2005.Google Scholar
  21. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2006a) Communication from the Commission on the Promotion of Inland Waterway Transport ‘NAIADES’ -An Integrated European Action Programme for Inland Waterway Transport, COM(2006) 6 final.Google Scholar
  22. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2006b) Logistics for Promoting Freight Intermodality, presentation by Ismo Koskinen at Consultation Workshop, Brussels, 25 April 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Community of European Railways (CER) (1989) Proposals for a European High-Speed Network, Brussels: CER.Google Scholar
  24. Eurostat (2004) European Business: Facts and Figures — 1998–2002.Google Scholar
  25. Exel, J. van, Reinsure, S., Gommers, M., Pearman, A. and Tsamboulas, D. (2002) ‘EU involvement in TEN development: network effects and value-added’, Transport Policy, 9(2002): 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. High Level Group (2003) Report on the Trans-European Transport Network (also known as the Van-Miert Report), http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/revision/hlg/2003_report_kvm_en.pdf.Google Scholar
  27. Official Journal (1978) Council Decision of 20 February 1978 instituting a consultation procedure and setting up a committee in the field of transport infrastructure, OJC 54 (78/174/EC).Google Scholar
  28. Official Journal (1991) Council Directive of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community’s Railways (91/440/EC), OJL 237 of 24 August 1991, pp.25–8.Google Scholar
  29. Official Journal (1996) Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system, OJL 235 of 17 September 1996, pp.6–24.Google Scholar
  30. Official Journal (2001a) Directive 2001/12 of the European Parliament of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/E on the development of the Community’s railways, OJL 75 of 15 March 2001, pp.1–25.Google Scholar
  31. Official Journal (2001b) Directive 2001/12 of the European Parliament of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings, OJL 75 of 15 March 2001, pp.26–8.Google Scholar
  32. Official Journal (2001c) Directive 2001/12 of the European Parliament of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and certification, OJL 75 of 15 March 2001, pp.29–46.Google Scholar
  33. Official Journal (2001d) Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system, OJL 110 of 20 April 2001, pp.1–27.Google Scholar
  34. Official Journal (2002) Commission Decisions 730–735 of 30 May 2002 — high speed TSIs, OJL 245 of 12 September 2002, pp.1–506.Google Scholar
  35. Official Journal (2004a) Corrigendum to Decision No 884/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Decision No 169/96/EC on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, OJL 201, pp.1–55.Google Scholar
  36. Official Journal (2004b) Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 29 April 2004 establishing a European Railway Agency, OJL 164 of 30 April 2004. A corrigendum has been published in OJL 220 of 21 June 2004, pp.3–15.Google Scholar
  37. Official Journal (2004c) Directive 2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 96/48/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the conventional rail system, OJL 164 of 30 April 2004. A corrigendum has been published in OJL 220 of 21 June 2004, pp.40–57.Google Scholar
  38. Official Journal (2004d) Directive 2004/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/440/EC on the development of the Community’s railways, OJL 164 of 30 April 2004. A corrigendum has been published in OJL 220 of 21 June 2004, pp.58–60.Google Scholar
  39. Official Journal (2004e) Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying f charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification, OJL 164 of 30 April 2004. A corrigendum has been published in OJL 220 of 21 June 2004, pp.16–39.Google Scholar
  40. Official Journal (2006a) Commission Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 of 23 December 2005 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the telematic applications for freight subsystems of the trans-European conventional rail system, OJL 13 of 18 January 2006, pp.1–72.Google Scholar
  41. Official Journal (2006b) Commission Regulation (EC) No 66/2006 of 23 December 2005 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem rolling stock — noise of the trans-European conventional rail system, OJL 37 of 8 February 2006, pp.1–49.Google Scholar
  42. Short, J. and Kopp. A. (2005) ‘Transport infrastructure: investment and planning — policy and research aspects’, Transport Policy, 12(2005): 360–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vinois, Jean-Arnold (2002) Creation of a European railway area against the background of the White Paper on European Transport Policy, http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/rail/overview/doc/ri-5jav-en.pdf — accessed December 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Johnson, C. Turner 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debra Johnson
    • 1
  • Colin Turner
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Marketing and Business StrategyHull UniversityUK
  2. 2.Hull UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations