the politics of intellectual history in twentieth-century europe

  • Duncan Kelly
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Advances book series (PAD)

Abstract

Reviewing so much more than Professor Wegele’s Deutsche Historiographie in the first edition of the English Historical Review of 1886, in what has since become a justly famous essay, Lord Acton critically evaluated various German ‘schools’ of history in the nineteenth century. Of course, although Acton was the most cosmopolitan of scholars, the fact that the first edition of what would quickly become the premier English historical periodical should be so concerned with the state of German scholarship suggests something more than passing historiographical interest. For at root, Acton’s discussions of these schools of history were underpinned by an account of the political implications of different versions of historical enquiry. Indeed, he even suggested — in what had by 1886 already become a standard trope of political discourse — that although German ‘historical writing was old’, strictly ‘historical thinking was new in Germany when it sprang from the shock of the French Revolution’.1 In conclusion, as well as fulfilling his aim to outline the ways in which these schools ‘break new ground and add to the notion and the work of history’, the general tenor of the essay offered nothing less than a full-blown evocation of the historical spirit of the age:

The tendency of the nineteenth century German to subject all things to the government of intelligible law, and to prefer the simplicity of resistless cause to the confused conflict of free wills, the tendency which Savigny defined and the comparative linguists encouraged, was completed in his own way by Hegel.2

Keywords

Political Theory Social History French Revolution Political Thought Intellectual History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    J. E. E. D. Acton, ‘German Schools of History’, English Historical Review 1 (1886), 7–42 (8).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Harold Mah, Enlightenment Phantasies: cultural identity in France and Germany 1750–1914 (Ithaca, NY, 2003), pp. 178ff.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Ernst Troeltsch, Der Historismus und seine Probleme (Tübingen, 1922), Gesammelte Schriften Vol. III, p. 102.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    George G. Iggers, The German Conception of History: the national tradition of historical thought from Herder to the present, revised edn (Hanover, NE, 1988 [orig. 1968]).Google Scholar
  5. F. M. Barnard, Herder on Social and Political Culture (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 39–43.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cf. Friedrich Meinecke, Die Enstehung der Historismus (Werke, Vol. III) ed. C. Hinrichs (Munich, 1959), trans. J. E. Anderson (rev. H. D. Schmidt) as Historism: the rise of a new historical outlook (London, 1972).Google Scholar
  7. Erich Rothacker, ‘Das Wort Historismus’, Zeitschrift für deutsche Wortforschung 1 (N. F.) (1960), 3–6.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    John Clairborne Isbell, The Birth of European Romanticism: truth and propaganda in Staël’s ‘De l’Allemagne’, 1810–1813 (Cambridge, 1994), especially pp. 124ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. see John Edward Toew’s recent study, Becoming Historical: cultural reformation and public memory in early nineteenth-century Berlin (Cambridge, 2004).Google Scholar
  10. John Edward Toew’s recent study, Becoming Historical: cultural reformation and public memory in early nineteenth-century Berlin (Cambridge, 2004).Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    See Keith Tribe, Strategies of Economic Order (Cambridge, 1995), pp. 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    Jacob Soll, ‘Empirical History and the Transformation of Political Criticism in France from Bodin to Bayle’, Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2003), 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Anthony Grafton, The Footnote: A History (London, 2003), especially pp. 122–47.Google Scholar
  14. Donald R. Kelley, Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: language, law, and history in the French Renaissance (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
  15. 10.
    Leopold von Ranke, ‘Über die Verwandtschaft und den Unterschied der Historie und der Politik: Eine Rede zum Antritt der ordentlichen Professur an der Universität zu Berlin’ [1836] reprinted in Leopold von Ranke, Sämtliche Werke (Leipzig, 1867–90), Vol. iii, pp. 280–93.Google Scholar
  16. Gangolf Hübinger, ‘Historicism and the “Noble Science of Politics” in Nineteenth-Century Germany’, in B. Stuchtey and P. Wende, eds, British and German Historiography, 1750–1950: traditions, perceptions and transfers (Oxford, 2000), p. 192.Google Scholar
  17. Hans Maier, Die ältere deutsche Staats- und Verwaltungslehre (2nd edn, Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
  18. David F. Lindenfeld, The Practical Imagination. The German sciences of state in the nineteenth century (Chicago, Ill., 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 12.
    See Richard Ashcraft, ‘German Historicism and the History of Political Theory’, History of Political Thoughts (1987), 289–324.Google Scholar
  20. 13.
    Max Weber, ‘Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis’ (1904), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, ed., J. Winckelmann (4th edn, Tübingen, 1973), especially pp. 157, 154, 182–5.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    P. Lassman and I. Velody, eds, Max Weber’s Science as Vocation (London, 1987), pp. 9, 20, 23.Google Scholar
  22. Larry Scaff, Fleeing the Iron Cage (Berkeley, Calif., 1991).Google Scholar
  23. Wilhelm Hennis, Max Webers Wissenschaft vom Menschen (Tübingen, 1996).Google Scholar
  24. 15.
    Joseph Femia, Against the Masses (Oxford, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 16.
    Duncan Kelly, ‘From Moralism to Modernism: Robert Michels on the history, theory and sociology of patriotism’, History of European Ideas 29 (2003), 339–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 17.
    Quentin Skinner, ‘The Empirical and the Critical Theorists of Democracy: a plague on both their houses’, Political Theory 1 (1972), 287–306.Google Scholar
  27. 18.
    Peter Laslett, ‘Introduction’, Philosophy, Politics and Society, 1st series, ed. Peter Laslett (Oxford, 1956).Google Scholar
  28. Isaiah Berlin, ‘Does Political Theory Still Exist’, in P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman, eds, Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd series (Oxford, 1964 [orig. 1962]), pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  29. David Easton, ‘The Decline of Modern Political Theory’, Journal of Politics 13 (1951), 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Alasdair Macintyre, ‘Is a Science of Comparative Politics Possible?’ in A. Macintyre, Against the Self-Images of the Age (London, 1971), pp. 260–79.Google Scholar
  31. 19.
    Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: the ‘objectivity question’ in North American historical scholarship (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 597ff, 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 20.
    Richard Tuck, ‘History of Political Thought’, in P. Burke, ed., New Perspectives on Historical Writing (Oxford, 1995), pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
  33. John Rawls, ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’, reprinted in John Rawls: Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman (Cambridge, Mass., 1999), pp. 303–59.Google Scholar
  34. 21.
    R. G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (Oxford, 1956), pp. 215, 317.Google Scholar
  35. 22.
    Quentin Skinner, ‘The Principles and Practice of Opposition: the case of Bolingbroke versus Walpole’, in N. McKendrick, ed., Historical Perspectives (London, 1974), pp. 93–128.Google Scholar
  36. 23.
    Quentin Skinner, ed., The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
  37. 24.
    T. E. Willey, Back to Kant: the revival of Kantianism in German social and historical thought, 1860–1914 (Detroit, Mich., 1978).Google Scholar
  38. 25.
    Wilhelm Dilthey, ‘The Nature of Philosophy’ and ‘Construction of the Historical World’ in Dilthey: Selected Writings, ed., H. P. Rickman (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 127, 177–84.Google Scholar
  39. 26.
    See Klaus Reich, ‘Kant and Greek Ethics (I.)’, Mind 48 (1939), 338–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 27.
    Larry Frohman, ‘Neo-Stoicism and the Transition to Modernity in Wilhelm Dilthey’s Philosophy of History’, Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (1995), 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peter N. Miller, ‘Nazis and Neo-Stoics: Otto Brunner and Gerhard Oestreich before and after the Second World War’, Past and Present 176 (2002), 144–86, especially 182f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 28.
    Jonathan Israel, Radical Enlightenment: philosophy and the making of modernity 1650–1750 (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
  43. 29.
    Arnaldo Momigliano, ‘The First Political Commentary on Tacitus’, Journal of Roman Studies 37 (1947), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richard Tuck, Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651 (Cambridge, 1993), pp. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 30.
    Gerhard Oestreich, Neo-Stoicism and the Modern State, eds, B. Oestreich and H. G. Koenigsberger, trans. D. McLintock (Cambridge, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Carlo Ginzburg, ‘Germanic Mythology and Nazism: thoughts on an old book by Georges Dumézil’, Myths, Emblems, Clues, trans. Anne E. Tedeschi (London, 1990), pp. 126–45.Google Scholar
  47. Arnaldo Momigliano, ‘Georges Dumézil and the Trifunctional Approach to Roman Civilization’, History and Theory 22 (1984), 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peter Schöttler, ed., Geschichtsschreibung als Legitimationswissenschaft, 1918–1945 (Frankfurt, 1997).Google Scholar
  49. Ingo Haar, Historiker im Nationalsozialismus (Göttingen, 2000).Google Scholar
  50. 32.
    Marc Bloch, ‘Pour une histoire comparée des sociétés européenes’, Mélanges Historiques, 2 Vols (Paris, 1963), I, pp. 16–40.Google Scholar
  51. 33.
    Lucien Febvre, La terre et l’évolution humaine (Paris, 1922).Google Scholar
  52. Fernand Braudel, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II, trans. Siân Reynolds, 2 Vols (London, 1972).Google Scholar
  53. 34.
    Perry Anderson, ‘Fernand Braudel and National Identity’, A Zone of Engagement (London, 1992), p. 265.Google Scholar
  54. Julia Stapleton, Englishness and the Study of Politics: the social and political thought of Ernest Barker (Cambridge, 1994), especially pp. 120–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 35.
    Peter Burke, The French Historical Revolution: the Annales School, 1929–1989 (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
  56. 36.
    François Furet, Interpreting the French Revolution, trans. Elborg Foster (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
  57. Robert Darnton, The Business of Enlightenment (Cambridge, Mass., 1979).Google Scholar
  58. Roger Chartier, The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane (London, and Durham, NC, 1991).Google Scholar
  59. 37.
    Keith Baker, Inventing the French Revolution (Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 38.
    Keith Baker, ‘In Memoriam: François Furet’, Journal of Modern History 72 (2000), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Michael Scott Christofferson, ‘An Antitotalitarian History of the French Revolution: François Furet’s Penser la Revolution française in the intellectual politics of the late 1970s’, French Historical Studies 22 (1999), 557–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 39.
    François Furet, ‘Beyond the Annales’, Journal of Modern History 55 (1983), 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 40.
    François Furet, The Passing of an Illusion (Chicago, Ill., 1999).Google Scholar
  64. 41.
    Raphael Samuel, ‘British Marxist Historians Part I’, New Left Review 120 (1980), 21–96.Google Scholar
  65. Eric Hobsbawm, ‘The Historians’ Group of the Communist Party’, in M. Cornforth, ed., Rebels and Their Causes: essays in honour of A. L. Morton (London, 1978), pp. 21–47.Google Scholar
  66. Perry Anderson, Arguments Within English Marxism (London, 1980).Google Scholar
  67. 42.
    Neal Wood, ‘The Social History of Political Theory’, Political Theory 6 (1978), 345–67.Google Scholar
  68. Ellen Meiksins Wood and Neal Wood, Class Ideology and Ancient Political Theory: Socrates, Plato and Aristotle in social context (Oxford, 1978), pp. ix, 1, 12.Google Scholar
  69. 43.
    Robert Darnton, ‘In Search of the Enlightenment: recent attempts to create a social history of ideas’, Journal of Modem History 43 (1971), 113–32 (132).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 44.
    Duncan Kelly, ‘The Political Thought of Isaiah Berlin’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (2002), 25–48, especially 43ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 45.
    Robert Wokler, ‘The Professoriate of Political Thought in England since 1914: a tale of three chairs’, in D. Castiglione and I. Hampsher-Monk, eds, The History of Political Thought in National Contexts (Cambridge, 2001), pp. 134–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 46.
    John Plamenatz, Man and Society, 3 Vols (London, 1963).Google Scholar
  73. G. H. Sabine’s famous textbook, A History of Political Theory (3rd edn, London, 1963).Google Scholar
  74. 47.
    C. B. Macpherson, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Oxford, 1962).Google Scholar
  75. Jules Townshend, C. B. Macpherson and the Problem of Liberal Democracy (Edinburgh, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 48.
    Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edn, Chicago, Ill., 1970), especially pp. 166ff.Google Scholar
  77. 49.
    Franco Venturi, Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. J. G. A. Pocock, Barbarism and Religion (Cambridge, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 50.
    Carlo Ginzburg, ‘Microhistory: two or three things I know about it’, trans. John and Anne C. Tedeschi, Critical Inquiry 20 (1993), 10–35 (17, 20).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 51.
    Geoff Eley, ‘Labor History, Social History, Alltagsgeschichte: experience, culture, and the politics of the everyday — a new direction for German social history?’, Journal of Modern History 61 (1989), 297–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. cf. G. Iggers, ed., The Social History of Politics: critical perspectives in West German historical writing since 1945 (Leamington Spa, 1985), for earlier illustrations.Google Scholar
  82. 52.
    Annabel Brett, ‘What is Intellectual History Now?’ in D. Cannadine, ed., What is History Now? (Basingstoke, 2002), pp. 113–31 (p. 127).Google Scholar
  83. Roger Chartier, ‘Intellectual History or Sociocultural History?’ in Dominick LaCapra and Steven L. Kaplan, eds, Modern European Intellectual History: re-appraisals and new perspectives (Ithaca, NY, 1982), pp. 13–46.Google Scholar
  84. cf. Dominick LaCapra, History and Criticism (Ithaca, NY, 1985), especially pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
  85. 53.
    Carlo Ginzburg, ‘“Your Country Needs You”: A Case Study in Political Iconography’, History Workshop Journal 52 (2001), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Perry Anderson, ‘Nocturnal Enquiry: Carlo Ginzburg’ in A Zone of Engagement (London, 1992), pp. 207–29.Google Scholar
  87. 54.
    Duncan Kelly, ‘Rethinking Franz Neumann’s Route to Behemoth’, History of Political Thought 23 (2003), 458–96.Google Scholar
  88. 55.
    See Franz Neumann, The Rule of Law (Leamington Spa, 1986 [orig. 1936]).Google Scholar
  89. Peter Gay, My German Question (New Haven, Conn., 1998), pp. 2ff.Google Scholar
  90. 56.
    John Gunnell, Imagining the American Polity: political science and the discourse of democracy (Pennsylvania, 2005).Google Scholar
  91. Franz Neumann, The Democratic and Authoritarian State, ed., Herbert Marcuse (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
  92. 58.
    Jürgen Habermas, ‘Constitutional Democracy: a paradoxical union of contradictory principles’, Political Theory 29 (2001), 766–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. The Inclusion of the Other, eds C. Cronin and P. de Grieff (Oxford, 1998).Google Scholar
  94. cf. Patchen Markell, ‘Making Affect Safe for Democracy? On “constitutional patriotism”’, Political Theory 28 (2001), 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 59.
    Jürgen Habermas, ‘The Horrors of Autonomy: Carl Schmitt in English’, The New Conservatism: cultural criticism and the historians debate, ed. and trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen (Oxford, 1994), pp. 128–39.Google Scholar
  96. 60.
    Jan-Werner Müller, A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in post-war European thought (London, and New Haven, Conn., 2004).Google Scholar
  97. Donald R. Kelley, The Descent of Ideas (Aldershot, 2002), pp. 235ff.Google Scholar
  98. 61.
    Sunhil Khilnani, Arguing Revolution: the intellectual left in post-war France (New Haven, Conn., 1993).Google Scholar
  99. Tony Judt, Marxism and the French Left: essays on labour and politics in France, 1830–1981 (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar
  100. 62.
    Pasquale Pasquino, ‘Michel Foucault (1926–1984): the will to knowledge’, Economy and Society 15 (1986), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 63.
    Daniel Conway, ‘Pas de Deux: Habermas and Foucault in genealogical communication’, in S. Ashenden and D. Owen, eds, Foucault contra Habermas (London, 1999), pp. 60–89.Google Scholar
  102. Michel Foucault, ‘What is Enlightenment?’ Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed., Paul Rabinow, trans. Robert Hurley et al. (London, 1997), pp. 303–20.Google Scholar
  103. 64.
    Jurgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Frederick Lawrence (Oxford, 1995 [orig. 1985]), pp. 256ff, 264f.Google Scholar
  104. 65.
    Charles Maier, The Unmasterable Past (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
  105. Geoff Eley, ‘Nazism, Politics and the Image of the Past: thoughts on the West German Historikerstreit 1986–1987’, Past and Present 121 (1988), 171–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 66.
    Jurgen Habermas, ‘Eine Art Schadensabwicklung: Die apologetischen Tendenzen in der deutschen Zeitgeschichtsschreibung’, Die Zeit (11 July 1986).Google Scholar
  107. 67.
    Cf. Hayden White, Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe (Baltimore, Md, 1973).Google Scholar
  108. Lawrence Stone, ‘The Revival of Narrative’, Past and Present 85 (1979), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 69.
    Bernard Williams, Truth and Truthfulness (Princeton, NJ, 2003).Google Scholar
  110. Richard Rorty, ‘The Historiography of Philosophy: four genres’, in R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind and Q. Skinner, eds, Philosophy in History (Cambridge, 1993 [orig. 1984]), pp. 49–75.Google Scholar
  111. 70.
    Ernst Gombrich, Aby Warburg — an intellectual biography (London, 1970), pp. 287, 308, 327.Google Scholar
  112. E. H. Gombrich, ‘Aby Warburg: his aims and methods: an anniversary lecture’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 62 (1999), 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 72.
    Nicolai Rubinstein, ‘The Beginnings of Political Thought in Florence: a study in medieval historiography’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 5 (1942), 198–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Quentin Skinner, ‘Ambrogio Lorenzetti: the artist as political philosopher’, Proceedings of the British Academy 72 (1987), 1–56.Google Scholar
  115. 73.
    Ernst Kantorowicz, ‘The Este Portrait by Roger van der Weyden’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 3 (1940), 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Martin Ruehl, ‘“In this Time Without Emperors”: the politics of Ernst Kantorowicz’s Kaiser Friedrich der Zweite reconsidered’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 63 (2000), 187–242, especially 217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 74.
    Fritz Saxl and Erwin Panofsky, ‘Classical Mythology in Mediaeval Art’, Metropolitan Museum Studies 4 (1932/33), 228–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 75.
    Francis Haskell, History and its Images (London, and New Haven, Conn., 1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Duncan Kelly 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duncan Kelly

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations